Archiwum
Filozofii Prawa
i Filozofii Społecznej

Journal of the Polish Section of IVR (ISSN:2082-3304)

IVR
  • About us
  • Aim & scope
  • News
  • Issues
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
  • Editorial board
    • Board Members
    • Reviewers
  • For authors
  • Ethics
  • Contact
  • Polski

Monocentrism and Multicentrism as Legal Theories in the Global Era

Prof. dr hab. Tadeusz Buksiński

Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań

English abstract: The article describes two opposing theories of legislation and jurisprudence in the global age: multicentrism and monocentrism. The first one claims that a new legal system at the supra-state level is emerging, which must take into consideration varied legal traditions. The second one stresses that certain fundamental principles must be shared today by all people. It seems that the ultimate goal of jurisprudence is to create a system of laws that reconciles multitude and diversity with unity.

Keywords: multicentrism, monocentrism, theory of legislation

Language: English

Published: Number 1(10)/2015, pp. 5-13

DOI: https://doi.org/10.36280/AFPiFS.2015.1.5

Download: Download
Number of downloads:
414

Filed Under: Articles Tagged With: monocentrism, multicentrism, theory of legislation

Szukaj

Categories

  • Articles
  • Bez kategorii
  • Editorial
  • In Memoriam
  • News
  • Reports
  • Reviews and discussions

Keywords

Aristotle collective guilt personalistic dialogue norm Joanna Kuźmicka-Sulikowska spiritual crisis Critical Legal Studies constitutional reasoning is-statements Maciej Kłodawski critical legal positivism legal database Berlin Wall nomos of law distributive justice equal consideration principle situationist and normativist concepts virtue jurisprudence system of law intertemporal decision Maciej Koszowski Thomas Bayes transmission easement Jakub Łakomy multiculturalism of law declaration of will practical reasoning ethos Agamben jurisdictio and gubernaculum British Critical Legal Conference fundamental rights personalized medicine state of exception Hobbes social responsibility religious pluralism truth manner of taking into account the expiration of the limitation period structural coupling Scarpelli one right answer visuality public morality prosecutors Sylwia Wojtczak application of the law communicative rationality legitimacy profession of advocate

Copyright © 2025 Polska Sekcja Międzynarodowego Stowarzyszenia Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Społecznej IVR | Administrator strony: Karolina Gmerek

Ta strona używa plików cookies. Zakładamy, że wyrażają Państwo na to zgodę, ale mogą Państwo także wyłączyć pliki cookies w Ustawieniach. //
This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. (Zob. więcej // Read more) Ustawienia // SettingsZGODA // ACCEPT

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT