<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<front><journal-meta><journal-title-group><journal-title>Archiwum Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Spolecznej</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn>2082-3304</issn></journal-meta><article-meta><title-group><article-title>Pluralism and Religion Again: Reply to Henry Hardy</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Beata Polanowska-Sygulska</surname></name></contrib></contrib-group><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.36280/AFPiFS.2020.3.127</article-id><volume>24</volume><issue>3</issue><pub-date><year>2020</year></pub-date><fpage>127</fpage><lpage>129</lpage><abstract><p>The article constitutes a continuation of the discussion between Henry Hardy and myself, which was initiated in AFPiFS in 2019 as a result of my publishing a review of Hardy’s book: In Search of Isaiah Berlin: A Literary Adventure (2018). In the present commentary I address again the nub of our disagreement, that is the relationship between Berlin’s pluralism and universalist religions, like Christianity and Islam. According to Hardy pluralism undermines universalist religions. I distance myself from his standpoint and argue that it is possible to reconcile adherence to pluralist perspective in ethics with religious belief. Besides, I return to the objection raised in my review of Hardy’s book and take up the thread of conflicts within values. I sustain my charge that Hardy does not take seriously enough the implications of conflicts within single values.</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>value pluralism</kwd><kwd>universalist religions</kwd><kwd>religious pluralism</kwd><kwd>conflicts within values Language: English</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body /></article>