Research article

Kant, Korsgaard and the Moral Status of Animals

Article authors
  1. Tomasz Pietrzykowski — corresponding author

Kant, Korsgaard i podmiotowość moralna zwierząt

Archiwum Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Społecznej, nr 2(11)/2015, s. 106–119

English

Abstract

The paper discusses the views of Christine Korsgaard – one of leading modern Kantian moral philosophers – on the proper status of sentient animals. Famously, Kantian moral theory is considered as much less favorable to the idea of animal rights than the competing utilitarian tradition. Ch. Korsgaard however reexamines the foundations of Kantian ethics and comes to the conclusion that their best reading implies (contrary to Kant’s own beliefs) that not only humans but also sentient animals deserve to be treated as ends in themselves. Her interpretation and development of Kantian ethics aims to reconcile it with modern philosophical naturalism and contemporary scientific knowledge on the nature of living creatures. Ch. Korsgaard proposes convincing comprehensive picture of naturalistic axiology and its ethical implications. Nonetheless, I raise two important objections that her views seem to give rise to – concerning the nature of human and non-human subjective selves as well as relation between moral and legal rights. The paper is based mainly on the opinions presented by Ch. Korsgaard during the 3-days seminar held in Oxford (2014) devoted to discussion of her views on the status and rights of animals from the perspective of Kantian ethics as well as on her numerous writings related to the subject.

Keywords

  • Christine Korsgaard
  • Immanual Kant
  • Kantianism
  • animal rights
Full text PDF How to cite

References

17 reference entries

References

  1. Elżanowski, A., Pietrzykowski, T. (2013). Zwierzęta jako nieosobowe podmioty prawa. Forum Prawnicze 1, 18-27.

  2. Frankfurt, H. (1997). Wolność woli i pojęcie osoby. In J. Hołówka (Ed.), Fragmenty filozofii analitycznej, t. 4: Filozofia moralności. Warszawa: Aletheia.

  3. Hume, D. (1963). Traktat o naturze ludzkiej, t. 1. Warszawa: PWN.

  4. Kant, I. (1900). Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten. Berlin.

  5. Kant, I. (1953). Uzasadnienie metafizyki moralności. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Marek Derewiecki.

  6. Kant, I. (1997). Lectures on Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  7. Korsgaard, Ch. (2004). Fellow Creatures: Kantian Ethics and Our Duties to Animals. Tanner Lectures on Human Values 24, 77-110.

  8. Korsgaard, Ch. (2008). Just Like All the Other Animals on the Earth. Harvard Divinity Bulletin 36(3).

  9. Korsgaard, Ch. (2009). Self-Constitution. Agency, Identity and Integrity. Oxford–New York: Oxford University Press.

  10. Korsgaard, Ch. (2011). Interacting with Animals: A Kantian Account. In L. Beuchamp, R.G. Frey (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Animal Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  11. Korsgaard, Ch. (2012). A Kantian Case for Animal Rights. In M. Michel, D. Kuhne, J. Hanni (Eds.), Animal Law – Tier im Recht. Developments and Perspectives in the 21st Century. Zurich–St. Gallen: Dike Publishers.

  12. Korsgaard, Ch. (2013). Kantian Ethics, Animals, and the Law. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 1, 1-20.

  13. Korsgaard, Ch. (2014). Fellow Creatures: The Moral and Legal Standing of Animals. 2014 Uehiro Lecture and Seminar, 1–4.12.2014 r.

  14. Łuków, P. (2004). Komentarz do tekstu A. Kaniowskiego pt. Filozofia praktyczna Immanuela Kanta – jej siła i słabości. Diametros 2, 137-147.

  15. Nozick, R. (1999). Anarchia, państwo, utopia. Warszawa: Aletheia.

  16. Pietrzykowski, T. (2001). Miękki pozytywizm i spór o regułę uznania. In J. Stelmach (Ed.), Studia z filozofii prawa, t. 1. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.

  17. Tobor, Z., Pietrzykowski, T. (2003). Roszczenie do bezstronności. In J. Stelmach (Ed.), Filozofia prawa wobec globalizmu. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.

Publication information

Author and affiliation

prof. dr hab.Tomasz Pietrzykowski

Uniwersytet Śląski w Katowicach

Issue data

Issue nr 2(11)/2015

Pages
106–119
Published
AccessOtwarty LicenceCC BY 4.0 ↗

How to cite

Bibliographic description and verified export formats.

Format AFPiFS

T. Pietrzykowski, Kant, Korsgaard and the Moral Status of Animals, „Archiwum Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Społecznej” nr 2(11)/2015, s. 106–119, DOI: 10.36280/afpifs.2015.2.106