prof. UŁ dr hab. Jerzy Leszczyński

Lodz University

English abstract: The article contains a polemic with the thesis that populism and the unveiling of the hitherto hidden political nature of law have resulted in a crisis of legal discourses. In addition, it argues against recognizing democratic/liberal hegemony as the main cause of these phenomena. Criticism of democratic liberalism from a political point of view provides little basis for announcing that jurisprudence has lost its credibility and its reconstruction should mean the overt politicization of legal discourses. Such a position is not an element of Ch. Mouffe’s agonistic theory. On the contrary, the project of agonistic democracy assumes maintaining legal democratic institutions that require political neutrality. The rule of law and the law meeting the requirements of the normative idea of law should be considered as political demands. Only then can law as normativity be contrasted with the factuality of law as the sovereign’s decision. This duality is visible in the concept of the state of emergency (C. Schmitt). To a large extent, the article is a polemic with the works of A. Sulikowski.

Keywords: agonism, Mouffe, politicalness, law, rule of law, Sulikowski

Language: Polish

Published: nr 3(40)/2024, pp. 41-53.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.36280/AFPiFS.2024.3.41

Download: Download

Number of downloads: 64

This text is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.