Research article
On the Analytical Importance of the National Interest in Theoretical Exploration of the European Integration Process
On the Analytical Importance of the National Interest in Theoretical Exploration of the European Integration Process
Archiwum Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Społecznej, nr 2(13)/2016, s. 59-75
polski
Abstrakt
This article seeks to elaborate the theoretical discourse on different, competing explanations of the European integration, invoking the notion of the national interest that plays an essential role in the process. Despite increasing integration, the European interest remains quite different from the sum of the national interests of all Member States, and different theories, by presenting explanations of the integration process, raise or diminish its importance. The major premise of the intergovernmental theory is that the integration progress can be analyzed as an intergovernmental regime designed to coordinate the economic and political interdependence negotiated through bargaining. This implies that Member States’ behavior reflects actions taken by their governments based on rational choice, limited only by the domestic social demands and external strategic international environment. According to intergovernmentalism this process, within which states’ preferences are shaped, is in fact the process of national interest formation. In contrast, a second school of thought on integration, affiliated with supranationalism, has a more normative ambition, providing not only a description of the role of the national interest, but also bringing the ideas of its limitation, proposing changes on the mode of European governance aimed at shaping Europe in a more republican manner. Despite the dominant position of the national agents at almost every level of the European governance, for the supranational approaches, due to the multi-level structure of the European Union, controversy between national interest and European common good is rarely invoked. The assumption that one theoretical understanding and the assessment of the level of influence of the national interest as applied to the European integration can have profound legal and political implications, leads us to the conclusion that depicting the five most prominent attempts at capturing it theoretically remains essential for further analysis of the European structure and European legal order. Paradoxically, an unstable economic situation and its overreaching and predominant negative influence on all the Member States, might catalyze a redefinition of Europe and reinvigorate the discourse on both European common good and national interests.
angielski
Abstract
This article seeks to elaborate the theoretical discourse on different, competing explanations of the European integration, invoking the notion of the national interest that plays an essential role in the process. Despite increasing integration, the European interest remains quite different from the sum of the national interests of all Member States, and different theories, by presenting explanations of the integration process, raise or diminish its importance. The major premise of the intergovernmental theory is that the integration progress can be analyzed as an intergovernmental regime designed to coordinate the economic and political interdependence negotiated through bargaining. This implies that Member States’ behavior reflects actions taken by their governments based on rational choice, limited only by the domestic social demands and external strategic international environment. According to intergovernmentalism this process, within which states’ preferences are shaped, is in fact the process of national interest formation. In contrast, a second school of thought on integration, affiliated with supranationalism, has a more normative ambition, providing not only a description of the role of the national interest, but also bringing the ideas of its limitation, proposing changes on the mode of European governance aimed at shaping Europe in a more republican manner. Despite the dominant position of the national agents at almost every level of the European governance, for the supranational approaches, due to the multi-level structure of the European Union, controversy between national interest and European common good is rarely invoked. The assumption that one theoretical understanding and the assessment of the level of influence of the national interest as applied to the European integration can have profound legal and political implications, leads us to the conclusion that depicting the five most prominent attempts at capturing it theoretically remains essential for further analysis of the European structure and European legal order. Paradoxically, an unstable economic situation and its overreaching and predominant negative influence on all the Member States, might catalyze a redefinition of Europe and reinvigorate the discourse on both European common good and national interests.
Keywords
- theory of European integration
- national interest
- European Union
Bibliografia
24 pozycji bibliograficznych
Literatura
-
Camilleri, J.A., Falk, J. (1992). The End Of Sovereignty? The Politics of a Shrinking and Fragmenting World. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.
-
Corbey, D. (1995). Dialectical Functionalism: Stagnation as a Booster of European Integration. International Organization 49(2), 253-284.
-
Friedman Goldstein, L. (2001). Constituting Federal Sovereignty: The European Union in Comparative Context. Baltimore–London: Johns Hopkins University Press.
-
Garrett, G., Tsebelis, G. (1996). An Institutional Critique of Intergovernmentalism. International Organization 50(2), 269–299.
-
Hix, S., Noury, A.G., Roland, G. (2007). Democratic Politics in the European Parliament. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
-
Hoffmann, S. (1964). The European Process at Atlantic Cross Purposes. Journal of Common Market Studies 3(2), 85–101.
-
Hoffmann, S. (1966). Obstinate or Obsolete? The Fate of the Nation-State and the Case of Western Europe. Daedalus 95(3), 862–915.
-
Jachtenfuchs, M. (2001). The Governance Approach To European Integration. Journal of Common Market Studies 39(2), 245–264.
-
Keohane, R.O., Nye, J.S. (2001). Power and Interdependence. New York-San Francisco: Longman.
-
Kohler-Koch, B., Rittberger, B. (2006). The ‘Governance’ Turn In EU Studies. Journal of Common Market Studies 44(s1), 27–49.
-
Lindseth, P.L. (2003). The Contradictions of Supranationalism: Administrative Governance and Constitutionalization in European Integration Since the 1950s. Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review 37(2), 363-406.
-
Maduro, M. (2003). The Double Constitutional Life of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. In: T. Hervey, J. Kenner ( Eds.), Economic and Social Rights under the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights. Oxford–Portland, OR: Hart Publishing.
-
Mann, C.J. (1972). The Function of Judicial Decision in European Economic Integration. The Hague: Springer.
-
Marks, G., Hooghe, L., Blank, K. (1996). European Integration from 1980s: State-Centric v. Multi-level Governance. Journal of Common Market Studies 34(3), 341-378.
-
Mattli, W. (1991). Explaining regional integration outcomes. Journal of European Public Policy 6(1), 1-27.
-
Milward, A. (1992). The European Rescue of the Nation State. London: Routledge.
-
Moravcsik, A. (1991). Negotiating the Single European Act: National Interests and Conventional Statecraft in the European Community. International Organization 45(1), 19–56.
-
Moravcsik, A. (1993). Preferences and Power in the European Community: A Liberal Intergovernmentalist Approach. Journal of Common Market Studies 31(4), 473–524.
-
Moravcsik, A. (1998). The Choice for Europe: Social Purpose and State Power from Messina to Maastricht. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
-
Pollack, M.A. (1997). Delegation, Agency, and Agenda Setting in the European Community. International Organization 51(1), 99–134.
-
Sandholtz, W. (1996). Memberships Matters: Limits of the Functional Approach to European Institutions. Journal of Common Market Studies 34(3), 403–429.
-
Schimmelfennig, F., Rittberger, B. (2001). Theories of European Integration. In: J. Richardson ( Ed.), European Union: Power and Policy-making. London: Psychology Press.
-
Stone Sweet, A. (2000). Governing with Judges: Constitutional Politics in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
-
Tallberg, J. (2008). Bargaining Power in t he European Council. Journal of Common Market Studies 46(3), 685–708.
Informacje o publikacji
Dane wydania
Numer nr 2(13)/2016
- Strony
- 59-75
- Opublikowano
Jak cytować
Opis bibliograficzny i zweryfikowane formaty eksportowe.
Format AFPiFS
F. Strzyczkowski, On the Analytical Importance of the National Interest in Theoretical Exploration of the European Integration Process, „Archiwum Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Społecznej” nr 2(13)/2016, s. 59–75, DOI: 10.36280/afpifs.2016.2.59
ACM
[1] Franciszek Strzyczkowski. 2016. On the Analytical Importance of the National Interest in Theoretical Exploration of the European Integration Process. AFPiFS 2(13) (2016), 59–75. https://doi.org/10.36280/afpifs.2016.2.59
ACS
(1) Strzyczkowski, F. On the Analytical Importance of the National Interest in Theoretical Exploration of the European Integration Process. AFPiFS 2016, No. 2(13), 59–75. https://doi.org/10.36280/afpifs.2016.2.59.
APA
Strzyczkowski, F. (2016). On the Analytical Importance of the National Interest in Theoretical Exploration of the European Integration Process. Archiwum Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Społecznej, 2(13), 59–75. https://doi.org/10.36280/afpifs.2016.2.59
ABNT
STRZYCZKOWSKI, Franciszek. On the Analytical Importance of the National Interest in Theoretical Exploration of the European Integration Process. Archiwum Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Społecznej, n. 2(13), p. 59–75, 2016.
Chicago
Strzyczkowski, Franciszek. “On the Analytical Importance of the National Interest in Theoretical Exploration of the European Integration Process.” Archiwum Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Społecznej, no. 2(13) (2016): 59–75. https://doi.org/10.36280/afpifs.2016.2.59.
Harvard
Strzyczkowski, F. (2016) “On the Analytical Importance of the National Interest in Theoretical Exploration of the European Integration Process,” Archiwum Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Społecznej, 2(13), pp. 59–75. Available at: https://doi.org/10.36280/afpifs.2016.2.59.
IEEE
[1] F. Strzyczkowski, “On the Analytical Importance of the National Interest in Theoretical Exploration of the European Integration Process,” AFPiFS, no. 2(13), pp. 59–75, 2016, doi: 10.36280/afpifs.2016.2.59.
MLA
Strzyczkowski, Franciszek. “On the Analytical Importance of the National Interest in Theoretical Exploration of the European Integration Process.” Archiwum Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Społecznej, no. 2(13), 2016, pp. 59–75, https://doi.org/10.36280/afpifs.2016.2.59.
Turabian
Strzyczkowski, Franciszek. “On the Analytical Importance of the National Interest in Theoretical Exploration of the European Integration Process.” Archiwum Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Społecznej, no. 2(13) (2016): 59–75. https://doi.org/10.36280/afpifs.2016.2.59.
Vancouver
1. Strzyczkowski F. On the Analytical Importance of the National Interest in Theoretical Exploration of the European Integration Process. AFPiFS. 2016;2(13):59–75. doi:10.36280/afpifs.2016.2.59
OSCOLA
Franciszek Strzyczkowski, ‘On the Analytical Importance of the National Interest in Theoretical Exploration of the European Integration Process’ (2016) 2(13) AFPiFS 59 <https://doi.org/10.36280/afpifs.2016.2.59>.