<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Archiwum Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Społecznej</title>
	<atom:link href="https://archiwum.ivr.org.pl/tag/analogy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://archiwum.ivr.org.pl</link>
	<description>Journal of the Polish Section of IVR (ISSN:2082-3304)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 25 Aug 2019 22:02:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-GB</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Some remarks about the application of the cognitive linguistics’ tools for the differentiation between extensive interpretation and analogy</title>
		<link>https://archiwum.ivr.org.pl/835/some-remarks-about-the-application-of-the-cognitive-linguistics-tools-for-the-differentiation-between-extensive-interpretation-and-analogy/</link>
					<comments>https://archiwum.ivr.org.pl/835/some-remarks-about-the-application-of-the-cognitive-linguistics-tools-for-the-differentiation-between-extensive-interpretation-and-analogy/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Redakcja]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jul 2017 21:14:55 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[analogy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cognitive linguistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[extensive interpretation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interpretation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal reasoning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sylwia Wojtczak]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://archiwum.ivr.org.pl/?p=835</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Prof. UŁ dr hab. Sylwia Wojtczak University of Łódź English abstract: The paper is the proposal of the discussion upon the utility of the cognitive linguistics’ tools for legal application, especially within the field of legal interpretation and legal reasoning. Cognitive linguistics is the school of linguistics and cognitive science, developing from 1970s of the [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3><strong>Prof. UŁ dr hab. Sylwia Wojtczak</strong></h3>
<h4><span style="color: #808080;">University of Łódź</span></h4>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong><br />
<span style="color: #333333;">English abstract:</span></strong><span style="color: #333333;"> The paper is the  proposal of the discussion upon the utility of the cognitive linguistics’ tools for legal application, especially within the field of legal interpretation and legal reasoning. Cognitive linguistics is the school of linguistics and cognitive science, developing from 1970s of the XX century, researching on language and mind and their intersection. The analysis of the instances originating in the Polish law in force, made by the means of different concepts of cognitive linguistics (prototypes, radial categories, idealized cognitive models, conceptual metaphors) is here the basis to formulate some postulates concerning the way of understanding and differentiation between extensive interpretation and analogy. The instances and postulates simultaneously let one distinguish those linguistic changes, which inevitably occur in time, and which should be recognised as the domain of linguistic interpretation.<br />
</span><br />
<span style="color: #333333;"><strong>Keywords:</strong> cognitive linguistics, interpretation, extensive interpretation, legal reasoning, analogy </span></p>
<p><span style="color: #333333;"><strong>Language:</strong> Polish<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #333333;"><strong>Received:</strong>  29.09.2016<br />
<strong>Accepted:</strong> 31.10.2016<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #333333;"><strong>Published:</strong> Number 1(14)/2017, pp. 125-140.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #333333;"><strong>Download file:</strong> <a href="https://archiwum.ivr.org.pl/?ddownload=776" title="Download" rel="nofollow" class="ddownload-link id-776 ext-pdf">Download</a><br />
<strong><br />
Number of downloads: </strong>540</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://archiwum.ivr.org.pl/835/some-remarks-about-the-application-of-the-cognitive-linguistics-tools-for-the-differentiation-between-extensive-interpretation-and-analogy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chaïm Perelman and Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca’s Account of Analogy Applied to Law: the Proportional Model of Analogical Legal Reasoning</title>
		<link>https://archiwum.ivr.org.pl/705/chaim-perelman-and-lucie-olbrechts-tytecas-account-of-analogy-applied-to-law-the-proportional-model-of-analogical-legal-reasoning-2/</link>
					<comments>https://archiwum.ivr.org.pl/705/chaim-perelman-and-lucie-olbrechts-tytecas-account-of-analogy-applied-to-law-the-proportional-model-of-analogical-legal-reasoning-2/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Redakcja]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 May 2017 20:20:49 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[analogy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chaïm Perelman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal reasoning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maciej Koszowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proportionality]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://archiwum.ivr.org.pl/?p=705</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Dr Maciej Koszowski Jan Długosz University in Częstochowa English abstract: In this paper, the author has undertaken an attempt to adjust Chaïm Perelman and Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca’s conception of analogy to the province of law. He thus sketches out a pertinent scheme of legal analogy based upon the similarity of proportions and indulges in a consideration [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3><strong>Dr Maciej Koszowski<br />
</strong></h3>
<h4><span style="color: #808080;">Jan Długosz University in Częstochowa</span></h4>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong><br />
<span style="color: #333333;">English abstract:</span></strong><span style="color: #333333;"> In this paper, the author has undertaken an attempt to adjust Chaïm Perelman and Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca’s conception of analogy to the province of law. He thus sketches out a pertinent scheme of legal analogy based upon the similarity of proportions and indulges in a consideration of the merits and demerits of such a proposition. To this aim, as the proportions that are compared in such an account of analogy, the relations between the facts of the cases and their legal outcomes were chosen: one such outcome already known and one tentatively posited. Finally, however, the author’s analyses lead to the conclusion that despite its considerable theoretical attractiveness and some mystical charm, legal analogy consisting of the comparison of two proportions is either quite similar to orthodox approaches to analogical reasoning in law or too obscure for one to employ it credibly in the legal setting. In consequence, until its proponents have elucidated the workings of proportional analogy in more detail, the potential use of such a form of analogy in the province of law does not seem promising and cannot be recommended.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #333333;"><strong>Language:</strong> English</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #333333;"><strong>Keywords:</strong> proportion, proportional, proportionality, analogy, legal, Chaïm Perelman, Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca, account, law, reasoning, approach, logic, apply, analogically<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;"><strong>Published:</strong> Number 2(13)/2016, pp. 5-13.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;"><strong>DOI:</strong><span style="color: #ff0000;"><span style="color: #ff6600;"><a style="color: #ff6600;" href="https://doi.org/10.36280/AFPiFS.2016.2.5"> https://doi.org/10.36280/AFPiFS.2016.2.5</a></span></span></span></p>
<p><span style="color: #333333;"><strong>Download file:</strong> <a href="https://archiwum.ivr.org.pl/?ddownload=1482" title="Download" rel="nofollow" class="ddownload-link id-1482 ext-pdf">Download</a><br />
<strong><br />
Number of downloads: </strong>1,549</span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://archiwum.ivr.org.pl/705/chaim-perelman-and-lucie-olbrechts-tytecas-account-of-analogy-applied-to-law-the-proportional-model-of-analogical-legal-reasoning-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
