Archiwum
Filozofii Prawa
i Filozofii Społecznej

Journal of the Polish Section of IVR (ISSN:2082-3304)

IVR

Criminalization of communist propaganda in the jurisprudence of the Supreme Court of the Second Republic of Poland

Mgr Kamil Słomiński

University of Warsaw

English abstract: Combating totalitarian propaganda is a topic that continues to challenge the law, including criminal law dogmatics. The criminalization of totalitarian propaganda plays a special role in countries which have been affected by these regimes. Polish law currently criminalizes the propagation of communist ideology. It is worth presenting how this concept was shaped against the historical background of the regulations in force in the Second Republic of Poland. The article addresses the issue of criminalization of communist propaganda in the Second Republic of Poland. It analyses the rulings of the Supreme Court and scholars’ views concerning this issue from the period 1918–1939.

Keywords: criminalization, communism, propaganda, jurisprudence, Supreme Court

Language: English

Published: Number 3(44)/2025, pp. 107-118.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.36280/AFPiFS.2025.3.107

Download: Download

Number of downloads: 56

This text is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

On the Origin of Legal Interests in a Liberal Criminal Law System. Preliminary Remarks

Dr Ewa GRZĘDA

Institute of Law, Economics and Administration of the University of the Commission of National Education in Kraków

Dr Maciej JUZASZEK

Center for Legal Education and Social Theory of the University of Wrocław

English abstract: The article tries to answer the legal-philosophical problem underlying the continental theories of criminalization, i.e., what the reasons are for the legislator establishing a specific catalogue of interests protected by law. To answer this question, the authors first outline what characterizes continental criminalization theories (as opposed to common law ones), and then present two basic types of theories justifying the legislator’s choice of legal interests: systemicinherent and system-transcendent theories. Within the systemic-transcendent type, the authors distinguish three potential theories: a systemic-transcendent social theory, a systemictranscendent moralistic theory, and a systemic-transcendent disintegrative theory. Against each of them, however, the authors find serious disqualifying arguments, which eventually makes them argue that the answers to the research question posed above should be sought among system-inherent theories.

Keywords: legal interests, criminalization, philosophy of criminal law

Language: Polish

Published: Number 4(37)/2023, pp. 27-39.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.36280/AFPiFS.2023.4.27

Download: Download Number of downloads: 173

This text is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial – No Derivative Works 4.0 International License.