Prof. UMK dr hab. Aleksandra Kustra-Rogatka
Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń
English abstract: The dynamic development of judicial review of the constitutionality of laws in the second half of the twentieth century is reflected in contemporary theories of judicial review. They go beyond the original axis of the dispute over the legitimacy of judicial review, which was shaped by the counter-majoritarian dilemma, and often become more nuanced. In addition to arguments related to the conceptions of institutional cooperation and accountability function of judicial review, rights-based theories of judicial review take on more and more importance.
The aim of this article is to outline a wide range of issues related to the protection of fundamental rights, which protection is considered as an argument in the dispute over the legitimacy of constitutional courts. The study presents selected issues that influence the current discourse on judicial review, which include: types of such judicial review; types of arguments used in the analysed discourse; the link between fundamental rights and various concepts of democracy; and judicial review of legislative decisions concerning positive rights guarantees.
Keywords: constitutional courts, fundamental rights, democracy, positive rights
Published: Number 1(30)/2022, pp. 33-43
Number of downloads: 119
This text is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial – No Derivative Works 4.0 International License.