Archiwum
Filozofii Prawa
i Filozofii Społecznej

Prof. dr Martin Krygier

UNSW Sydney

English abstract: Central among the many obscurities that attend the rule of law are those named in the title of the article. The first part contains some preliminary remarks and attempt to answer the first question. This attempt is based on distinguishing two ways of understanding what rule of law is. By the first way rule of law is a theological concept, i.e. to know what it is we have to know its aims and by the second, anatomical one, the most important thing to understand it are rules and institutions that are usually conceived as its part. The author holds a position that only the first way is appropriate and gives his own interpretation of aims of rule of law. This aim is legal reduction of the possibility of arbitrary exercise of power that is connected with four important reductions – of domination, of fear, of indignity, and of confusion.

Keywords: rule of law, arbitrariness, exercise of power, aims of rule of law

Language: Polish
Translated by: Katarzyna Mikołajczyk-Graj

Published: Number 2(3)/2011, pp. 5-19.

Download file: Download
Number of downloads: 442

References

1. Call Ch. (red.), Constructing Justice and Security after War, Washington 2007 
2. Fleming J. (red.), Getting to the Rule of Law, NO MOS 54, New York 2011/11 
3. Fuller L.L., The Morality of Law, New Haven 1969
4. Shklar J., Political Theory and the Rule of Law w: Hoffman S.(red.), Political Theory and Political Thinkers, Chicago 1998 
5. Golub S., A House Without Foundations w: Carothers T. (red.), Promoting the Rule of Law Abroad, Washington 2006 
6. Holmes S., Judicial Independence as Ambiguous Reality and Insidious Illusion w: Dworkin R. (red.), From Liberal Values to Democratic Transition. Essays in Honor of János Kis, Budapest 2004 
7. Jacoby W., Priest and Penitent: The European Union as a Force in the Domestic Politics of Eastern Europe, “East European Constitutional Review” 1999/8 
8. Jensen E., Heller T. C. (red.), Beyond Common Knowledge. Empirical Approaches to the Rule of Law, Stanford 2003 
9. Krygier M., Approaching the Rule of Law, w: Mason W. (red.), The Rule of Law in Afghanistan: Missing in Inaction, Cambridge 2010 
10. Krygier M., Ethical Postivism and the Liberalism of Fear, w: Campbell T., Goldsworthy J. (red.), Judicial Powers, Democracy and Legal Positivism, Aldershot 2000
11. Krygier M., The Grammar of Colonial Legality: Subjects, Objects, and the Australian Rule of Law, w: Brennan G., Castles F.G. (red.), Australia Reshaped: 200 Years of Institutional Transformation, Cambridge 2002 
12. Krygier M., The Rule of Law: An Abuser’s Guide, w: Sajó A. (red.), The Dark Side of Fundamental Rights, Utrecht 2006 
13. MacCormick N., Waldron J., Rhetoric and the Rule of Law, Oxford 2005 
14. Magalhães P., The Politics of Judicial Reform in Eastern Europe, “Comparative Politics” 1999/1 
15. Miller P.N. (red.), Political Writings, Cambridge 1993 
16. Oakeshott M., Political Education w: Rationalism in Politics and Other Essays, Indianapolis 1991 
17. Palombella G., Walker N. (red.), Relocating the Rule of Law, Oxford 2009 
18. Palombella G., The Rule of Law as an Institutional Ideal w: Palombella G., Morlino L. (red.), Rule of Law and Democracy: Internal and External Issues, Leiden 2010 
19. Peerenboom R., Human Rights and Rule of Law: What’s the Relationship?, “Georgetown Journal of International Law” 2005/36 
20. Pettit Ph., Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government, Oxford 1997 
21. Poggi G., Durkheim, Oxford 2000 
22. Reid J. Ph., Rule of Law, DeKalb 2004 
23. Sannerholm R., Rule of Law after War: Ideologies, Norms and Methods for Legal and Judicial Reform, “Örebro Studies in Law” 2009/1 
24. Selznick Ph., The Moral Commonwealth, Berkeley 1992 
25. Trubek D., Santos A. (red.), The New Law and Economic Development: A Critical Approach, New York 2006 
26. Upham F., The Illusory Promise of the Rule of Law, w: Sajó A. (red.), Human Rights with Modesty: The Problem of Universalism, Leiden-Boston 2004 
27. Waldron J., Is the Rule of Law an Essentially Contested Concept (in Florida?), “Law and Philosophy” 2002/21 
28. Waldron J., The Rule of Law and the Importance of Procedure w: Fleming J. (red.), Getting to the Rule of Law, NO MOS 54, New York 2011