<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Archiwum Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Społecznej</title>
	<atom:link href="https://archiwum.ivr.org.pl/tag/existentialism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://archiwum.ivr.org.pl</link>
	<description>Journal of the Polish Section of IVR (ISSN:2082-3304)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Dec 2021 16:51:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-GB</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>From Tischner&#8217;s Critique of the Understanding of Work in Marxism to the Apotheosis of Work as Dialogue</title>
		<link>https://archiwum.ivr.org.pl/5041/work-for-man-or-man-for-work-tischners-transition-from-the-critique-of-marxism-to-the-apotheosis-of-dialogue-and-an-attempt-at-a-contemporary-interpretation-of-the-problem/</link>
					<comments>https://archiwum.ivr.org.pl/5041/work-for-man-or-man-for-work-tischners-transition-from-the-critique-of-marxism-to-the-apotheosis-of-dialogue-and-an-attempt-at-a-contemporary-interpretation-of-the-problem/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Redakcja (Mateusz Mońka)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2021 19:24:36 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dialogue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[existentialism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tischner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[work]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://archiwum.ivr.org.pl/?p=5041</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Mgr Michał Stachurski University of Opole English abstract: Philosophy, being a field that looks for answers to various questions, does not overlook topics related to human work and technology. Usually, reflection is arranged along two axes: the economic and ethical one. These questions are a tool to attempt to define the value of human work [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3><strong>Mgr Michał Stachurski<br />
</strong></h3>
<h4><span style="color: #808080; font-size: 14pt;"> University of Opole<br />
</span></h4>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: #000000; font-size: 12pt;"><strong>English abstract: </strong></span><span style="color: #000000;">Philosophy, being a field that looks for answers to various questions, does not overlook topics related to human work and technology. Usually, reflection is arranged along two axes: the economic and ethical one. These questions are a tool to attempt to define the value of human work as precisely as possible, also within the framework of axiology. The topic of work and its importance in human life was also taken up by Józef Tischner. He is counted as a representative of such trends as the philosophy of meeting or personalism. The aim of this article is to show what work is in Józef Tischner’s thought, what its goals are, and how Józef Tischner characterized the ‘man of work’ within the philosophy of dialogue, as well as a certain interpretation of Tischner&#8217;s thought in the context of contemporary existential philosophy and social ethics.</span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: #000000;"><strong>Keywords: </strong> work, Tischner, dialogue, existentialism, social ethics </span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;"><strong>Language:</strong> Polish<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;"><strong>Published:</strong> Number 4(29)/2021, pp.71-81</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;"><strong>DOI: </strong><a style="color: #000000;" href="https://doi.org/10.36280/AFPiFS.2021.4.71">https://doi.org/10.36280/AFPiFS.2021.4.71</a></span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;"><strong>Download:</strong> <a href="https://archiwum.ivr.org.pl/?ddownload=5123" title="Download" rel="nofollow" class="ddownload-link id-5123 ext-pdf">Download</a></span><br />
<span style="color: #000000;"><strong>Number of downloads:</strong> 562</span></p>
<p align="JUSTIFY"><span style="color: #000000;"><span lang="en-US">This text is licensed under a </span><a style="color: #000000;" href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/"><span lang="en-US">Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial – No Derivative Works 4.0 International License</span></a><span lang="en-US">.</span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://archiwum.ivr.org.pl/5041/work-for-man-or-man-for-work-tischners-transition-from-the-critique-of-marxism-to-the-apotheosis-of-dialogue-and-an-attempt-at-a-contemporary-interpretation-of-the-problem/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Philosophical Roots of the Dialogical Concept of Law</title>
		<link>https://archiwum.ivr.org.pl/721/philosophical-roots-of-the-dialogical-concept-of-law/</link>
					<comments>https://archiwum.ivr.org.pl/721/philosophical-roots-of-the-dialogical-concept-of-law/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Redakcja]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 May 2017 20:56:21 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anna rossmanith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dialogue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[difference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[encounter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethical relationship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[existentialism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[logos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phenomenology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[philosophy of dialogue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[subject]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the Other]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://archiwum.ivr.org.pl/?p=721</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Dr Anna Rossmanith University of Warsaw Abstract: The main task which I pose for myself is to indicate the philosophical roots of the dialogical concept of law. First and foremost, I would like to present dialogue in the context of ancient Greek philosophy and in the context of the classicists of the philosophy of dialogue. [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3><strong>Dr Anna Rossmanith<br />
</strong></h3>
<h4><span style="color: #808080;">University of Warsaw</span></h4>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong><br />
<span style="color: #333333;">Abstract:</span></strong><span style="color: #333333;"> The main task which I pose for myself is to indicate the philosophical roots of the dialogical concept of law. First and foremost, I would like to present dialogue in the context of ancient Greek philosophy and in the context of the classicists of the philosophy of dialogue. Furthermore, I seek phenomenological bases for constructing the dialogical concept of law. The phenomenological method, starting with its classical Husserlian form, has undergone many changes. Thanks to the indication of new horizons of phenomenology by Emmanuel Levinas, discovering dialogical consciousness and the subject constituted in being with the Other are possible. The reference point of reflections on the concept of law is the relationship with the Other as an ethical relationship. Philosophy of dialogue is a certain possible prism of thinking about the social, public, and institutional space. It is thinking through the prism of dialogue (speaking), but also through the third who contributes discourse relevant to what is said. Law as the third, as the mediating element, is a co-constituting element of the entire legal world.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #333333;"><strong>Language:</strong> English</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #333333;"><strong>Keywords:</strong> dialogue, philosophy of dialogue, encounter, phenomenology, the Other, existentialism, subject, ethical relationship, difference, logos</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;"><strong>Published:</strong> Number 2(13)/2016, pp. 51-58.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;"><strong>DOI:</strong></span> <span style="color: #ff0000;"><a style="color: #ff0000;" href="https://doi.org/10.36280/AFPiFS.2016.2.51">https://doi.org/10.36280/AFPiFS.2016.2.51</a></span></p>
<p><span style="color: #333333;"><strong>Download file:</strong> <a href="https://archiwum.ivr.org.pl/?ddownload=1485" title="Download" rel="nofollow" class="ddownload-link id-1485 ext-pdf">Download</a><br />
<strong><br />
Number of downloads: </strong>148</span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://archiwum.ivr.org.pl/721/philosophical-roots-of-the-dialogical-concept-of-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
