<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Archiwum Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Społecznej</title>
	<atom:link href="https://archiwum.ivr.org.pl/tag/ius-et-lex-en/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://archiwum.ivr.org.pl</link>
	<description>Journal of the Polish Section of IVR (ISSN:2082-3304)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2019 22:35:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-GB</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>The ius et lex distinction in the contemporary legal science</title>
		<link>https://archiwum.ivr.org.pl/947/the-ius-et-lex-distinction-in-the-contemporary-legal-science/</link>
					<comments>https://archiwum.ivr.org.pl/947/the-ius-et-lex-distinction-in-the-contemporary-legal-science/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Redakcja]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2018 23:50:15 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dualism of law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ius et lex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law beyond statutory law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maciej Pichlak]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://archiwum.ivr.org.pl/?p=947</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Dr Maciej Pichlak University of Wroclaw English abstract: The aim of the paper is to clarify the concepts of ius and lex, as well as to indicate main interpretations of these concepts in the contemporary jurisprudence. For the concepts of ius and lex are not only of historical significance (as used in the legal discourse [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3><strong>Dr Maciej Pichlak<br />
</strong></h3>
<h4><span style="color: #808080;">University of Wroclaw</span></h4>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: #333333;"><strong>English abstract: </strong>The aim of the paper is to clarify the concepts of ius and lex, as well as to indicate main interpretations of these concepts in the contemporary jurisprudence. For the concepts of ius and lex are not only of historical significance (as used in the legal discourse of the ancient Rome), but they are present in the entire history of the Western legal culture – since ancient times until today. Owing to this rich historical heritage, as well as to the very nature of the discussed concepts, it is impossible to offer classical definitions of ius and/or lex. Therefore, a proper analysis of their meaning will lead to determination of their ‘connotative field’: a map of associations and theories related to these concepts.<br />
</span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: #333333;">In order to realize this task, the paper offers three basic typologies that allow to order mutual relations between existing theoretical standpoints in this field. The first typology concerns a practical function of ius in the legal order. We can distinguish here theories which perceive such a function as mainly negative, positive, or mediating (optimalising). The second typology treats on the sources of binding force of ius. One can indicate positivistic, legalnaturalistic and hermeneutic intepretation of this problem. Finally, the third typology regards mutual relations between ius and lex, which may be described either as hierarchical, or as functionally differentiated. These considerations allow to conclude that the usefulness of such a dualistic way of thinking about the law is ever persisting. Within this perspective the legal order is conceived as containing statutory law (lex) as well as nonwritten binding standards, independent from law–making authorities (ius).<br />
</span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: #333333;"><strong>Keywrods:</strong> ius et lex, legal culture, law beyond statutory law, dualism of law<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #333333;"><strong>Language:</strong> Polish<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #333333;"><strong>Received:</strong> <span id=":bs" class="g3" title="9 marca 2017 14:19">09.03.2017</span><br />
<strong>Accepted:</strong> <img decoding="async" class="f gW" title="Standardy redakcyjne PL.doc" src="https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/images/cleardot.gif" alt="Załączniki" /><span id=":145" class="g3" title="3 maja 2017 15:26">03.05.2017</span><br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #333333;"><strong>Published:</strong> Number 2(15)/2017, pp. 49-59.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #333333;"><strong>Download file:</strong> <a href="https://archiwum.ivr.org.pl/?ddownload=2384" title="Download" rel="nofollow" class="ddownload-link id-2384 ext-pdf">Download</a></span><br />
<span style="color: #333333;"><strong>Number of downloads: </strong>943</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://archiwum.ivr.org.pl/947/the-ius-et-lex-distinction-in-the-contemporary-legal-science/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
