<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Archiwum Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Społecznej</title>
	<atom:link href="https://archiwum.ivr.org.pl/tag/izabela-skoczen-en/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://archiwum.ivr.org.pl</link>
	<description>Journal of the Polish Section of IVR (ISSN:2082-3304)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2018 14:19:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-GB</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>The strategic principle and the maxim of selectivity – a new insight on Gricean implicatures in the law</title>
		<link>https://archiwum.ivr.org.pl/818/the-strategic-principle-and-the-maxim-of-selectivity-a-new-insight-on-gricean-implicatures-in-the-law/</link>
					<comments>https://archiwum.ivr.org.pl/818/the-strategic-principle-and-the-maxim-of-selectivity-a-new-insight-on-gricean-implicatures-in-the-law/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Redakcja]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jul 2017 20:31:49 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conversational implicature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interpretation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Izabela Skoczeń]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Grice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pragmatics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[strategic speech]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://archiwum.ivr.org.pl/?p=818</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Mgr Izabela Skoczeń Jagiellonian University English abstract In the present paper, I attempt to answer three questions. First, whether the classical Gricean version of the implicature theory can be applied to describe legal discourse. Second, I provide an outline of one of the most popular theories of the pragmatics of legal language. Namely, Andrei Marmor’s [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3><strong>Mgr Izabela Skoczeń</strong></h3>
<h4><span style="color: #808080;">Jagiellonian University</span></h4>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong><br />
<span style="color: #333333;">English abstract</span></strong><span style="color: #333333;"> In the present paper, I attempt to answer three questions. First, whether the classical Gricean version of the implicature theory can be applied to describe legal discourse. Second, I provide an outline of one of the most popular theories of the pragmatics of legal language. Namely, Andrei Marmor’s theory of strategic speech. Strategic speech occurs mostly in indeterminate contexts, which contain elements that license even contradictory pragmatic inferences. Next, I attempt to flesh out the problematic points of this account. Third, I attempt to formulate a descriptive model of the strategic selectivity of pragmatic elements in the law, that could face the objections to Marmor’s ideas.<br />
</span><br />
<span style="color: #333333;"><strong>Keywords:</strong> conversational implicature, Paul Grice, pragmatics, interpretation, strategic speech</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #333333;"><strong>Language:</strong> Polish<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #333333;"><strong>Received:</strong>  06.10.2016<br />
<strong>Accepted:</strong> 10.12.2016<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #333333;"><strong>Published:</strong> Number 1(14)/2017, pp. 115-124.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #333333;"><strong>Download file:</strong> <a href="https://archiwum.ivr.org.pl/?ddownload=1458" title="Download" rel="nofollow" class="ddownload-link id-1458 ext-pdf">Download</a><br />
<strong><br />
Number of downloads: </strong>444</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://archiwum.ivr.org.pl/818/the-strategic-principle-and-the-maxim-of-selectivity-a-new-insight-on-gricean-implicatures-in-the-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>May fashionable and just have something in common? – or a few words about „thick terms”, „thick concepts” and „thick properties”</title>
		<link>https://archiwum.ivr.org.pl/623/may-fashionable-and-just-have-something-in-common-or-a-few-words-about-thick-terms-thick-concepts-and-thick-properties/</link>
					<comments>https://archiwum.ivr.org.pl/623/may-fashionable-and-just-have-something-in-common-or-a-few-words-about-thick-terms-thick-concepts-and-thick-properties/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Redakcja]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Oct 2016 22:50:56 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Izabela Skoczeń]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law and language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thick concepts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thick properties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thick terms]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://archiwum.ivr.org.pl/?p=623</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Mgr Izabela Skoczeń Jagiellonian University in Kraków Abstract: In the present article I explore two questions. First, what are the theoretical relations between thick terms, concepts and properties? I try to depict that the answer is dependent upon a choice of philosophical assumptions. Second, I explore what are the possible bonds between descriptive and evaluative [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3><strong>Mgr Izabela Skoczeń</strong></h3>
<h4><span style="color: #808080;">Jagiellonian University in Kraków</span></h4>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong><br />
<span style="color: #333333;">Abstract:</span></strong><span style="color: #333333;"> In the present article I explore two questions. First, what are the theoretical relations between thick terms, concepts and properties? I try to depict that the answer is dependent upon a choice of philosophical assumptions. Second, I explore what are the possible bonds between descriptive and evaluative components of thick expressions. I concentrate on the nature of the evaluative component and contrast the semantic and pragmatic approaches. Finally, I conclude that terms such as ‘legal’ are par excellence thick. Therefore, we should be aware of all the theoretical intricacies of the evaluative content when building a coherent theory of the legal realm.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #333333;"><strong>Keywords:</strong> thick terms, thick concepts, thick properties, legal philosophy, law and language </span></p>
<p><span style="color: #333333;"><strong>Language:</strong> Polish<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #333333;"><strong>Published:</strong> Number 1(12)/2016, p. 55-63.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #333333;"><strong>Download file:</strong> <a href="https://archiwum.ivr.org.pl/?ddownload=597" title="Download" rel="nofollow" class="ddownload-link id-597 ext-pdf">Download</a><br />
<strong><br />
Numer of downloads: </strong>436</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://archiwum.ivr.org.pl/623/may-fashionable-and-just-have-something-in-common-or-a-few-words-about-thick-terms-thick-concepts-and-thick-properties/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
