<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Archiwum Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Społecznej</title>
	<atom:link href="https://archiwum.ivr.org.pl/tag/libertarianism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://archiwum.ivr.org.pl</link>
	<description>Journal of the Polish Section of IVR (ISSN:2082-3304)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2023 20:08:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-GB</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Proceeds of Crime, Punishment, and Libertarianism</title>
		<link>https://archiwum.ivr.org.pl/6041/proceeds-of-crime-punishment-and-libertarianism/</link>
					<comments>https://archiwum.ivr.org.pl/6041/proceeds-of-crime-punishment-and-libertarianism/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Redakcja (Mateusz Pękala)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Aug 2023 14:57:58 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[libertarianism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proceeds of crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[punishment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[restitution]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://archiwum.ivr.org.pl/?p=6041</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Łukasz Dominiak Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Poland English abstract: In his recent publication, Walter Block claims that disgorgement of indirect proceeds of crime is incompatible with libertarianism. The present paper argues that Block’s claim is incorrect. In support of this position two general arguments are offered. The first one builds on the distinction between [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3><strong>Łukasz Dominiak</strong></h3>
<h4>Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Poland</h4>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>English abstract: </strong>In his recent publication, Walter Block claims that disgorgement of indirect proceeds of crime is incompatible with libertarianism. The present paper argues that Block’s claim is incorrect. In support of this position two general arguments are offered. The first one builds on the distinction between restitution and punishment, showing that forfeiture of assets derived indirectly from crime would not – contra Block – result in unequal punishment under retributive justice. The second one refers to libertarian principles of distributive justice and demonstrates that indirect proceeds of crime are owned by the aggrieved parties. Put together, these arguments conclusively show that the idea that indirect proceeds of crime should be forfeited is compatible with libertarianism.</p>
<p><strong>Keywords: </strong>proceeds of crime, libertarianism, restitution, punishment</p>
<p><strong>Language: </strong>English</p>
<p><strong>Published:</strong> Number 2(35)/2023, pp. 20-33.</p>
<p><strong>DOI: </strong>https://doi.org/10.36280//AFPiFS.2023.2.20</p>
<p><strong>Download:</strong> <a href="https://archiwum.ivr.org.pl/?ddownload=6123" title="Download" rel="nofollow" class="ddownload-link id-6123 ext-pdf">Download</a><br />
<strong>Number of downloads:</strong> 247</p>
<p align="JUSTIFY"><span lang="en-US">This text is licensed under a </span><a href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/"><span lang="en-US">Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial – No Derivative Works 4.0 International License</span></a><span lang="en-US">.</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://archiwum.ivr.org.pl/6041/proceeds-of-crime-punishment-and-libertarianism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Revolutionary Political Philosophy of Ayn Rand</title>
		<link>https://archiwum.ivr.org.pl/2445/the-revolutionary-political-philosophy-of-ayn-rand/</link>
					<comments>https://archiwum.ivr.org.pl/2445/the-revolutionary-political-philosophy-of-ayn-rand/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Redakcja]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2019 17:53:07 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[libertarianism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[objectivism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[philosophy of politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revolutionism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sławomir Drelich]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://archiwum.ivr.org.pl/?p=2445</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Dr Sławomir Drelich Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń Abstract: Ayn Rand is generally considered a libertarian, although she never claimed to belong to this movement. Undoubtedly, she was best known for promoting liberal and capitalist ideas. The author of this paper argues that Rand’s philosophical and political concepts can be described as revolutionary. The purpose [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3><strong>Dr Sławomir Drelich<br />
</strong></h3>
<h4><span style="color: #808080;">Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń</span></h4>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: #333333;"><strong>Abstract: </strong>Ayn Rand is generally considered a libertarian, although she never claimed to belong to this movement. Undoubtedly, she was best known for promoting liberal and capitalist ideas. The author of this paper argues that Rand’s philosophical and political concepts can be described as revolutionary. The purpose of this text is to prove it by pointing to the manifestations of revolutionism in Rand’s works, ideas and concepts. The author distinguishes five different aspects through which her revolutionism is expressed. These are: (1) the antimystical aspect; (2) the anthropological aspect; (3) the social aspect; (4) the political aspect, and (5) the economic aspect. Such wide-ranging revolutionism makes some researchers and commentators recognize Rand’s thought as a manifestation of utopian thinking. </span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: #333333;"><strong>Keywords:</strong> objectivism, libertarianism, philosophy of politics, liberalism, revolutionism<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #333333;"><strong>Language:</strong> English<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #333333;"><strong>Received:</strong> 31.10.2017<br />
<strong>Accepted:</strong> 27.03.2018</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #333333;"><strong>Published:</strong> Number 2(17)/2018, pp. 35-46.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #333333;"><strong>Download file:</strong> <a href="https://archiwum.ivr.org.pl/?ddownload=2438" title="Download" rel="nofollow" class="ddownload-link id-2438 ext-pdf">Download</a></span><br />
<span style="color: #333333;"><strong>Number of downloads: </strong>413</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://archiwum.ivr.org.pl/2445/the-revolutionary-political-philosophy-of-ayn-rand/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
