<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Archiwum Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Społecznej</title>
	<atom:link href="https://archiwum.ivr.org.pl/tag/marta-dubowska-en/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://archiwum.ivr.org.pl</link>
	<description>Journal of the Polish Section of IVR (ISSN:2082-3304)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 May 2021 16:14:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-GB</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Jurisprudence Popularized: Between Law, Literature, and Film</title>
		<link>https://archiwum.ivr.org.pl/4269/jurisprudence-popularized-between-law-literature-and-film-2/</link>
					<comments>https://archiwum.ivr.org.pl/4269/jurisprudence-popularized-between-law-literature-and-film-2/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Karolina Gmerek]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2021 13:27:10 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jurisprudence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law and Film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law and literature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law and popular culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marta Dubowska]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[narrative]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://archiwum.ivr.org.pl/?p=4269</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Mgr Marta Dubowska Jagiellonian University in Kraków Abstract: In this paper I discuss the apparent similarities between the “literate approach” and the aspiring “visual media approach”. Then, I scrutinize arguments for utility of the second approach. It seems that even though both approaches are founded on similar humanistic considerations, they are nonetheless separate positions; thus the [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3><span style="color: #000000;"><strong>Mgr Marta Dubowska</strong></span></h3>
<h4><span style="color: #000000;">Jagiellonian University in Kraków</span></h4>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: #000000;"><strong>Abstract: </strong></span><span style="color: #000000;">In this paper I discuss the apparent similarities between the “literate approach” and the aspiring “visual media approach”. Then, I scrutinize arguments for utility of the second approach. It seems that even though both approaches are founded on similar humanistic considerations, they are nonetheless separate positions; thus the need to justify the application of the second approach independently of the first. As an important task in due course I consider debunking the arguments in support of accusations of the “law and film” movement of being a threat to law and its legitimacy (as related to the “law going pop” argument by Richard K. Sherwin).</span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: #000000;"><strong>Keywords: </strong>law and literature, law and film, law and popular culture, narrative, jurisprudence</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;"><strong>Language:</strong> English</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;"><strong>Published:</strong> Number 1(26)/2021, s. 21-32.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;"><strong>DOI: </strong><a style="color: #000000;" href="https://doi.org/10.36280/AFPiFS.2021.1.21" data-slimstat="5"><span style="color: #ff6600;">https://doi.org/10.36280/AFPiFS.2021.1.21</span></a></span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;"><strong>Download:</strong> <a href="https://archiwum.ivr.org.pl/?ddownload=4439" title="Download" rel="nofollow" class="ddownload-link id-4439 ext-pdf">Download</a></span><br />
<span style="color: #000000;"><strong>Number of downloads:</strong> 513</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://archiwum.ivr.org.pl/4269/jurisprudence-popularized-between-law-literature-and-film-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Legal Narrative and Legal Disagreement</title>
		<link>https://archiwum.ivr.org.pl/2464/legal-narrative-and-legal-disagreement/</link>
					<comments>https://archiwum.ivr.org.pl/2464/legal-narrative-and-legal-disagreement/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Redakcja]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2019 18:41:11 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adam Dyrda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[general legal theories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal disagreement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal narrative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal truisms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marta Dubowska]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[narrative disagreement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[theoretical disagreement]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://archiwum.ivr.org.pl/?p=2464</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Mgr Marta Dubowska, Dr hab. Adam Dyrda Jagiellonian University in Kraków Abstract: What is the relationship between general legal theories and legal narratives? In this paper we aim to problematise this relationship in the context of different legal disagreements. As we see it, the Dworkinean category of “theoretical disagreement”, which basically refers to the phenomenon [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3><strong>Mgr Marta Dubowska, Dr hab. Adam Dyrda</strong></h3>
<h4><span style="color: #808080;">Jagiellonian University in Kraków</span></h4>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: #333333;"><strong>Abstract: </strong>What is the relationship between general legal theories and legal narratives? In this paper we aim to problematise this relationship in the context of different legal disagreements. As we see it, the Dworkinean category of “theoretical disagreement”, which basically refers to the phenomenon of disagreement “about the grounds of law” (between different general legal theories) is not sufficient to cover all substantial disagreements that appear in legal practice. Thus, we propose a category of “narrative disagreement” which has a wider scope. Eventually, we discuss the thesis of a possible equality of legal theories, as well as legal narratives, which we understand as an inevitable consequence of the relationship between legal theories/narratives and a special type of evidence on which they both rely: truisms about the law that laymen and/or legal professionals generally share.<br />
</span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: #333333;"><strong>Keywords:</strong> general legal theories, legal disagreement, theoretical disagreement, narrative disagreement, legal narrative, legal truisms<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #333333;"><strong>Language:</strong> English<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #333333;"><strong>Received:</strong> 26.12.2017<br />
<strong>Accepted:</strong> 26.01.2018</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #333333;"><strong>Published:</strong> Number 2(17)/2018, pp. 47-59.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #333333;"><strong>Download file:</strong> <a href="https://archiwum.ivr.org.pl/?ddownload=2878" title="Download" rel="nofollow" class="ddownload-link id-2878 ext-pdf">Download</a></span><br />
<span style="color: #333333;"><strong>Number of downloads: </strong>412</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://archiwum.ivr.org.pl/2464/legal-narrative-and-legal-disagreement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
