Archiwum Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Społecznej https://archiwum.ivr.org.pl Journal of the Polish Section of IVR (ISSN:2082-3304) Sat, 08 Sep 2018 10:12:51 +0000 en-GB hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4 Fish – Dworkin debate as an example of dispute about practice of interpretation of law https://archiwum.ivr.org.pl/569/fish-dworkin-debate-as-an-example-of-dispute-about-practice-of-interpretation-of-law/ https://archiwum.ivr.org.pl/569/fish-dworkin-debate-as-an-example-of-dispute-about-practice-of-interpretation-of-law/#respond Tue, 27 Sep 2016 23:08:17 +0000 http://archiwum.ivr.org.pl/?p=569 Dr Michał Pełka

University of Warsaw


English abstract: The aim of the article is to critically asses the theories of interpretation developed by two prominent philosophers, namely Stanley Fish and Ronald Dworkin. After first describing and reconstructing their ideas the paper then identifies problems concerning the stance according to which everything in applying law depends on interpretation. The critic is based on the Ludwig’s Wittgenstein remark that there must be grasping the rule (or more broadly a meaning of any word) which is not interpretation, otherwise we end up in regressus ad infinitum fallacy. Paper’s main claim is that although the theory of R. Dworkin is not fully free from defects it has nevertheless more explanation power than the opponent’s propositions.

Keywords: legal interpretation, meaning, Stanley Fish, Ronald Dworkin, Ludwig Wittgenstein

Language: Polish

Published: Number 2(11)/2015, p. 86-105.

Download file: Download

Number of downloads: 599

]]> https://archiwum.ivr.org.pl/569/fish-dworkin-debate-as-an-example-of-dispute-about-practice-of-interpretation-of-law/feed/ 0