University of Wroclaw

English abstract: The aim of this article is to present the assumptions of the populist constitutionalism in view of the unwavering support for populist groups and the related beliefs, resulting in irreversible changes in the perception of democratic reality. The starting point is an attempt to grasp the essence of populism and describe its elementary features. Populism is often defined in opposition to liberal thought and is analysed on two plans – the ideological and pragmatic one. An analysis of both of these elements makes it possible to indicate the political concept of populist democracy, the implementation of which is the goal of populists who achieve power. The assumptions of populist democracy are based on the implementation of the unfettered and current will of the people; at the same time, this concept perceives reality in an agonistic way – it is aware of the political necessity of all elements of public space, which make up the arena for the constantly clashing opposing interests. The above theses create a perspective through which one should look at the phenomenon of populist constitutionalism. There is no doubt that its starting point will be putting into practice populist beliefs and assumptions of populist democracy. Populist constitutional discourse, striving to implement the will of the people, does not reject the liberal institutions that have been in force so far. On the contrary, this phenomenon takes advantage of the hitherto achievements of constitutionalism and strives to transform them in such a way that – at least in principle – the will of the people can be implemented in the most unrestricted way possible. The final part of the reflections concerns the approach of populism to the constituent power, i.e., the power that enables the adoption and amendment of the constitution. It might seem that ‘legalizing’ the constituent power (e.g., in the form of an imperative mandate or popular referenda) would lead to the expansion of the power of the people, but populists do not seem to share this position. They point out that establishing a procedure which allows for additional expression of the will by citizens actually constrains their movements. Formal restrictions (e.g., the minimum number of signatures required) can often thwart the popular initiative.

Keywords: populist constitutionalism, populism, law, illiberalism, constituent power

Language: Polish

Published: Number 4(37)/2023, pp. 40-53.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.36280/AFPiFS.2023.4.40

Download: Download
Number of downloads: 286

This text is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial – No Derivative Works 4.0 International License.

University of Wrocław

Abstract: The topic of the article is the current crisis of the idea of the apolitical nature of jurisprudence and the relationship between this crisis and the phenomenon of populism. In the first part of the study, the author puts forward a thesis on the post-theological and liberal character of the idea, reconstructing its genealogy. The next part discusses the impact of first-wave populism (1930s and 1940s) on the status of the title idea, focusing primarily on authoritarian – Nazi and Stalinist – populisms. In the next part, the author diagnoses the causes of the current crisis of the title idea after the period of its demo-liberal reappointment.

Keywords: apoliticality, jurisprudence, discourse, populism, crisis, post-theology, liberalism

Language: Polish

Received: 13.06.2018
Accepted: 17.08.2018

Published: Number 3(18)/2018, pp. 74-85.

Download file: Download
Number of downloads: 562