<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Archiwum Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Społecznej</title>
	<atom:link href="https://archiwum.ivr.org.pl/tag/pragmatism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://archiwum.ivr.org.pl</link>
	<description>Journal of the Polish Section of IVR (ISSN:2082-3304)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2021 15:04:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-GB</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Norms and Novelty: Reflections on Legal Knowledge, Norms and Evolutionary Systems</title>
		<link>https://archiwum.ivr.org.pl/4650/norms-and-novelty-reflections-on-legal-knowledge-norms-and-evolutionary-systems/</link>
					<comments>https://archiwum.ivr.org.pl/4650/norms-and-novelty-reflections-on-legal-knowledge-norms-and-evolutionary-systems/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Redakcja (Mateusz Mońka)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2021 18:02:57 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal knowledge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal norms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[novelty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pragmatism]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://archiwum.ivr.org.pl/?p=4650</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Prof. dr Giovanni Tuzet Bocconi University in Milan English abstract: The paper has three sub-topics: legal knowledge, legal norms, and evolutionary systems. The three are interconnected. A reflection on the nature of legal knowledge throws light on the nature of legal norms. Legal knowledge is largely a posteriori and it is so because norms are largely [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3><span style="color: #000000;"><strong><span style="color: #333333;">Prof. dr Giovanni Tuzet</span><br />
</strong></span></h3>
<h4><span style="color: #808080;">Bocconi University in Milan</span></h4>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: #000000;"><strong>English abstract: </strong>The paper has three sub-topics: legal knowledge, legal norms, and evolutionary </span><span style="color: #000000;">systems. The three are interconnected. A reflection on the nature of legal knowledge </span><span style="color: #000000;">throws light on the nature of legal norms. Legal knowledge is largely a posteriori and it is so </span><span style="color: #000000;">because norms are largely contingent. Being a realm of continual change, law has novelty as </span><span style="color: #000000;">a fundamental feature. The process of legal change is not driven by chance but by the attempt to face ever new problems and changing circumstances. This supports a view of legal systems </span><span style="color: #000000;">as adaptive and evolutionary, as classical pragmatism suggested. However, inference can give </span><span style="color: #000000;">some a priori legal knowledge.</span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: #000000;"><strong>Keywords: </strong> inference, legal knowledge, legal norms, novelty, pragmatism</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;"><strong>Language:</strong> English<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;"><strong>Published:</strong> Number 2(27)/2021, pp. 108-122.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;"><strong>DOI: </strong><span style="color: #ff6600;"><a style="color: #ff6600;" href="https://doi.org/10.36280/AFPiFS.2021.2.108">https://doi.org/10.36280/AFPiFS.2021.2.108</a></span></span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;"><strong>Download:</strong> <a href="https://archiwum.ivr.org.pl/?ddownload=4759" title="Download" rel="nofollow" class="ddownload-link id-4759 ext-pdf">Download</a></span><br />
<span style="color: #000000;"><strong>Number of downloads:</strong> 411</span></p>
<p align="JUSTIFY"><span style="color: #333333;"><span lang="en-US">This text is licensed under a </span></span><a href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/"><span style="color: #4582ec;"><span lang="en-US">Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial – No Derivative Works 4.0 International License</span></span></a><span style="color: #333333;"><span lang="en-US">.</span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://archiwum.ivr.org.pl/4650/norms-and-novelty-reflections-on-legal-knowledge-norms-and-evolutionary-systems/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Theory of law and the challenges of analytical pragmatism</title>
		<link>https://archiwum.ivr.org.pl/840/theory-of-law-and-the-challenges-of-analytical-pragmatism/</link>
					<comments>https://archiwum.ivr.org.pl/840/theory-of-law-and-the-challenges-of-analytical-pragmatism/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Redakcja]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jul 2017 21:22:36 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[analytical philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maciej Dybowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pragmatism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Brandom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zygmunt Ziembiński]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://archiwum.ivr.org.pl/?p=840</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Dr Maciej Dybowski Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań English abstract: The article is a metaphilosophical and metatheoretical discussion relating to the theory of law pursued in the mainstream of the classical project of analysis. The purpose of these remarks is to show the challenges which philosophical pragmatism, and especially analytical pragmatism, poses to classical analysis. [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3><strong>Dr Maciej Dybowski</strong></h3>
<h4><span style="color: #808080;">Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań</span></h4>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong><br />
<span style="color: #333333;">English abstract:</span></strong><span style="color: #333333;"> The article is a metaphilosophical and metatheoretical discussion relating to the theory of law pursued in the mainstream of the classical project of analysis. The purpose of these remarks is to show the challenges which philosophical pragmatism, and especially analytical pragmatism, poses to classical analysis. The first part of the text is devoted to the presentation of the mainstream of postwar Polish law theory as the implementation of the analysis program, with the conception of Z. Ziembinski serving as an example. The next part characterizes analytical pragmatism of R. Brandom and the challenges addressed to such research programs as classical analysis. The last part examines philosophical benefits that classical analysis could obtain by embracing the challenges of analytical pragmatism. These include the ability to overcome the cognitive dualism, better justification of rationality and extending the anthropological perspective.<br />
</span><br />
<span style="color: #333333;"><strong>Keywords:</strong> pragmatism, Robert Brandom, Zygmunt Ziembiński, analytical philosophy</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #333333;"><strong>Language:</strong> Polish<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #333333;"><strong>Received:</strong>  05.01.2017<br />
<strong>Accepted:</strong> 22.01.2017<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #333333;"><strong>Published:</strong> Number 1(14)/2017, pp. 17-33.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #333333;"><strong>Download file:</strong> <a href="https://archiwum.ivr.org.pl/?ddownload=778" title="Download" rel="nofollow" class="ddownload-link id-778 ext-pdf">Download</a><br />
<strong><br />
Number of downloads: </strong>731</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://archiwum.ivr.org.pl/840/theory-of-law-and-the-challenges-of-analytical-pragmatism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
