<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Archiwum Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Społecznej</title>
	<atom:link href="https://archiwum.ivr.org.pl/tag/trial/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://archiwum.ivr.org.pl</link>
	<description>Journal of the Polish Section of IVR (ISSN:2082-3304)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2021 08:59:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-GB</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Identification of Procedural Acts Performed at the Trial: Considerations in the Context of the Actual Utterances of Non-professional Participants of Court Proceedings</title>
		<link>https://archiwum.ivr.org.pl/3258/identification-of-procedural-acts-performed-at-the-trial/</link>
					<comments>https://archiwum.ivr.org.pl/3258/identification-of-procedural-acts-performed-at-the-trial/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Redakcja]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2020 21:08:45 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conventional acts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[identification of procedural acts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interpretation of procedural statements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[procedural acts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trial]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://archiwum.ivr.org.pl/?p=3258</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Dr Karolina Gmerek University of Szczecin English abstract: The empirical research of the communication process at the trials which were held in common courts indicated, in particular, that the utterances of trial participants, despite their varied verbal forms, were identified as procedural acts. In addition, these verbal forms were often significantly different from the explicit [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3><strong>Dr Karolina Gmerek</strong></h3>
<h4><span style="color: #808080;">University of Szczecin</span></h4>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: #000000;"><strong>English abstract:</strong> The empirical research of the communication process at the trials which were held in common courts indicated, in particular, that the utterances of trial participants, despite their varied verbal forms, were identified as procedural acts. In addition, these verbal forms were often significantly different from the explicit forms where proper legal terms were used. The aforementioned results of the analysis lead the author to pose the following question: what thought processes (mechanisms) allow for the identification of procedural acts based on the utterances which are not explicit for the performance of these acts. The aim of this paper is to describe these types of mechanisms. The utterances of participants of a trial illustrate the issues taken into consideration in this paper. </span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: #000000;"><strong>Keywords: </strong>conventional acts, procedural acts, identification of procedural acts, trial, interpretation of procedural statements</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #333333;"><strong>Language:</strong> Original printed in Polish, English translation available below<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #333333;"><strong>Published:</strong> Number 1(22)/2020, pp. 21-36.<br />
</span></p>
<p><strong>DOI: </strong><span style="color: #ff6600;"><a style="color: #ff6600;" href="https://doi.org/10.36280/AFPiFS.2020.1.21ENG">https://doi.org/10.36280/AFPiFS.2020.1.21ENG</a></span><strong><br />
</strong></p>
<p><span style="color: #333333;"><strong>Download:</strong> <a href="https://archiwum.ivr.org.pl/?ddownload=4213" title="Download" rel="nofollow" class="ddownload-link id-4213 ext-pdf">Download</a></span><br />
<span style="color: #333333;"><strong>Number of downloads:</strong> 426</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://archiwum.ivr.org.pl/3258/identification-of-procedural-acts-performed-at-the-trial/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Intertextuality in trial</title>
		<link>https://archiwum.ivr.org.pl/788/intertextuality-in-trial/</link>
					<comments>https://archiwum.ivr.org.pl/788/intertextuality-in-trial/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Redakcja]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jul 2017 18:27:34 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[courtroom discource]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intertextuality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Karolina Gmerek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trial]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://archiwum.ivr.org.pl/?p=788</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Mgr Karolina Gmerek University of Szczecin English abstract: The aim of this article is to present a permanent part a of trial which is a phenomenon of intertextuality. The phenomenon co-creates the model of trial (seen as a complex communication event). The analysis of intertextuality is conducted on the basis of normative sources of the [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3><strong>Mgr Karolina Gmerek</strong></h3>
<h4><span style="color: #808080;">University of Szczecin</span></h4>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong><br />
<span style="color: #333333;">English abstract:</span></strong><span style="color: #333333;"> The aim of this article is to present a permanent part a of trial which is a phenomenon of intertextuality. The phenomenon co-creates the model of trial (seen as a complex communication event). The analysis of intertextuality is conducted on the basis of normative sources of the model of trial and the material recorded during field research in the courtroom. The examples of communication acts and events used in the article are: (1) components of the normative model of trial; (2) created due to communication practice; (3) examples of the normative model of trial contravening. The specific aim of this article is to describe structural and functional aspects of these communication acts and events, which are created due to communication practice.<br />
</span><br />
<span style="color: #333333;"><strong>Keywords:</strong> intertextuality, trial, courtroom discource</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #333333;"><strong>Received:</strong>  30.09.2016<br />
<strong>Accepted:</strong> 15.11.2016<br />
</span><br />
<span style="color: #333333;"><strong>Language:</strong> Polish<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #333333;"><strong>Published:</strong> Number 1(14)/2017, pp. 34-51.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #333333;"><strong>Download file:</strong> <a href="https://archiwum.ivr.org.pl/?ddownload=1453" title="Download" rel="nofollow" class="ddownload-link id-1453 ext-pdf">Download</a><br />
<strong><br />
Number of downloads: </strong>491</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://archiwum.ivr.org.pl/788/intertextuality-in-trial/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
