<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Archiwum Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Społecznej</title>
	<atom:link href="https://archiwum.ivr.org.pl/tag/weighing-the-rightness/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://archiwum.ivr.org.pl</link>
	<description>Journal of the Polish Section of IVR (ISSN:2082-3304)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2018 23:15:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-GB</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>The sorites paradox and vagueness phenomena in the language of law</title>
		<link>https://archiwum.ivr.org.pl/802/the-sorites-paradox-and-vagueness-phenomena-in-the-language-of-law/</link>
					<comments>https://archiwum.ivr.org.pl/802/the-sorites-paradox-and-vagueness-phenomena-in-the-language-of-law/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Redakcja]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jul 2017 19:43:06 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[language of law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sławomir Piekarczyk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sorites paradox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vagueness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[weighing the rightness]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://archiwum.ivr.org.pl/?p=802</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Mgr Sławomir Piekarczyk University of Silesia English abstract: In order to make a legal text more flexible, the lawmaker is enacting in its content the vague predicates. Provisions with such predicates are applied by the courts that are forming their content in every specific case depending on the case facts. This paper’s purpose is to [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3><strong>Mgr Sławomir Piekarczyk</strong></h3>
<h4><span style="color: #808080;">University of Silesia</span></h4>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong><br />
<span style="color: #333333;">English abstract:</span></strong><span style="color: #333333;"> In order to make a legal text more flexible, the lawmaker is enacting in its content the vague predicates. Provisions with such predicates are applied by the courts that are forming their content in every specific case depending on the case facts. This paper’s purpose is to explain an issue of the vagueness, point out and compare the varieties of vagueness in legal texts specified by A. Marmor and T. Gizbert-Studnicki and at last try to apply law’s vague predicates &#8211; anchored and not anchored in definite numbers – to the sorites paradox which is immanently associated with the vagueness phenomena.<br />
</span><br />
<span style="color: #333333;"><strong>Keywords:</strong> vagueness, language of law, sorites paradox, weighing the rightness</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #333333;"><strong>Language:</strong> Polish<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #333333;"><strong>Received:</strong>  10.05.2016<br />
<strong>Accepted:</strong> 23.12.2016<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #333333;"><strong>Published:</strong> Number 1(14)/2017, pp. 90-101.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #333333;"><strong>Download file:</strong> <a href="https://archiwum.ivr.org.pl/?ddownload=1456" title="Download" rel="nofollow" class="ddownload-link id-1456 ext-pdf">Download</a><br />
<strong><br />
Number of downloads: </strong>403</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://archiwum.ivr.org.pl/802/the-sorites-paradox-and-vagueness-phenomena-in-the-language-of-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
