<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Archiwum Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Społecznej</title>
	<atom:link href="https://archiwum.ivr.org.pl/tag/bioethics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://archiwum.ivr.org.pl</link>
	<description>Journal of the Polish Section of IVR (ISSN:2082-3304)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Jan 2025 15:57:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-GB</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Autonomy of Law in the Face of Bioethical Problems</title>
		<link>https://archiwum.ivr.org.pl/6879/autonomy-of-law-in-the-face-of-bioethical-problems/</link>
					<comments>https://archiwum.ivr.org.pl/6879/autonomy-of-law-in-the-face-of-bioethical-problems/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Patryk Kupis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Dec 2024 13:34:09 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Autonomy of law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bioethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neutrality of law.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[postulate of moral autonomy of law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[specificity of bioethics]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://archiwum.ivr.org.pl/?p=6879</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Dr hab. Martyna Łaszewska-Hellriegel, prof. UZ The University of Zielona Góra English abstract: The article deals with the issue of the autonomy of law in bioethics. The first part of the text briefly presents the concepts of the autonomy of law developed by the doctrine, which are then juxtaposed with the specifics of bioethics. In [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3>Dr hab. Martyna Łaszewska-Hellriegel, prof. UZ</h3>
<h4><span style="color: #808080;"><span style="font-size: 18.6667px;"><b>The University of Zielona Góra</b></span></span></h4>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: #000000; font-size: 12pt;"><strong>English abstract: <span style="font-weight: 400;">The article deals with the issue of the autonomy of law in bioethics. The first part of the text briefly presents the concepts of the autonomy of law developed by the doctrine, which are then juxtaposed with the specifics of bioethics. In epistemological terms, bioethics is a kind of hybrid, which will consist of both scientific claims and ethical arguments. The article asks whether we can speak at all about the concept of autonomy of law in bioethical issues? Or will legal arguments always depend on ethical principals? Finally, in which cases of bioethical argumentation can autonomy of law be seen? In this context, first of all, it draws the attention to the main task of bioethics, namely, the search for pragmatic solutions</span><span style="font-weight: 400;">.</span></strong></span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: #000000;"><strong>Keywords:</strong> <span style="font-weight: 400;">Autonomy of law, bioethics, specificity of bioethics, postulate of moral autonomy of law, neutrality of law.</span></span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;"><strong>Language: </strong>Polish<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;"><strong>Published:</strong> nr 4(41)/2024, pp. 81-90.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;"><strong>DOI: </strong>https://doi.org/10.36280/AFPiFS.2024.4.81<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;"><strong>Download: </strong><a href="https://archiwum.ivr.org.pl/?ddownload=6923" title="Download" rel="nofollow" class="ddownload-link id-6923 ext-pdf">Download</a></span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;"><strong>Number of downloads:</strong> 162<strong><br />
</strong></span></p>
<p align="JUSTIFY"><span style="color: #000000;"><span lang="en-US">This text is licensed under a <a href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</a></span><span lang="en-US">.</span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://archiwum.ivr.org.pl/6879/autonomy-of-law-in-the-face-of-bioethical-problems/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rights – Person – Death. Part 1: Around Daniel Sperling’s Theory</title>
		<link>https://archiwum.ivr.org.pl/2473/rights-person-death-part-1-around-daniel-sperlings-theory/</link>
					<comments>https://archiwum.ivr.org.pl/2473/rights-person-death-part-1-around-daniel-sperlings-theory/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Redakcja]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2019 18:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bioethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[death]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human being]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interests of the deceased]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maksymilian Hau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[person]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[protection of the memory of the deceased]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stanisław Jędrczak]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://archiwum.ivr.org.pl/?p=2473</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Maksymilian Hau, Stanisław Jędrczak University of Warsaw Abstract: This article is divided into two parts. In the first part, presented here, we present arguments for the concept of post-mortem interests. Post-mortem interests are understood as events that constitute a detriment or a benefit or to the deceased person, a person who no longer exists. A [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3><strong>Maksymilian Hau, Stanisław Jędrczak</strong></h3>
<h4><span style="color: #808080;">University of Warsaw</span></h4>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: #333333;"><strong>Abstract: </strong>This article is divided into two parts. In the first part, presented here, we present arguments for the concept of post-mortem interests. Post-mortem interests are understood as events that constitute a detriment or a benefit or to the deceased person, a person who no longer exists. A right is an interest of the person recognized and protected by law. In the second part, which will be published shortly, we examine the possibility of applying and the actual application of the theory of post-mortem interests in the Polish legal system. We address the following issues: medical confidentiality, protection of medical data after the patient’s death, author’s moral rights, protection of the memory of the deceased, the law on orders and decorations, and the legal status of human corpses. The theoretical background for this article was the book by Daniel Sperling Posthumous Interest, in which the author outlined the problem discussed in the perspective of the common law regime.<br />
</span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: #333333;"><strong>Keywords:</strong> death, person, interests of the deceased, human being, bioethics, protection of the memory of the deceased<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #333333;"><strong>Language:</strong> Polish</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #333333;"><strong>Received:</strong> 24.06.2017<br />
<strong>Accepted:</strong> 28.09.2017</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #333333;"><strong>Published:</strong> Number 2(17)/2018, pp. 75-89.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #333333;"><strong>Download file:</strong> <a href="https://archiwum.ivr.org.pl/?ddownload=2879" title="Download" rel="nofollow" class="ddownload-link id-2879 ext-pdf">Download</a></span><br />
<span style="color: #333333;"><strong>Number of downloads: </strong>341</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://archiwum.ivr.org.pl/2473/rights-person-death-part-1-around-daniel-sperlings-theory/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
