Pamięci zbiorowe, instytucje i prawo

Adam Czarnota; Justyna Jezierska; Michał Stambulski

doi:10.36280/afpifs.2019.3.6

Research article

Pamięci zbiorowe, instytucje i prawo

Adam Czarnota
Justyna Jezierska
Michał Stambulski

Collective Memories, Institutions and Law

Archiwum Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Społecznej, nr 3(21)/2019, s. 6-21

DOI 10.36280/afpifs.2019.3.6 ↗

Numer: nr 3(21)/2019
Strony: 6-21
Opublikowano: 2019
Język tekstu: polski

polski

Abstrakt

Artykuł ma na celu wyjaśnienie wzajemnych powiązań między koncepcjami pamięci zbiorowej, instytucji, polityki oraz prawa. Poprzez ukazanie sieci wzajemnych powiązań między tymi pojęciami chcemy pokazać, jak prawo i pamięć zbiorowa oddziałują na siebie. Jednocześnie widzimy trzy ujęcia relacji między pamięcią zbiorową a prawem, które możemy odpowiednio określić jako: 1) przeszłość przed prawem, 2) prawa pamięci 3) prawo jako pamięć zbiorowa. Pierwsze ujęcie polega na ocenie przeszłości w ramach procesu sądowego. Drugie polega na tworzeniu przepisów prawnych, które promują lub wymagają upamiętnienia określonego wydarzenia z przeszłości. Trzecie ujęcia polega na postrzeganiu samego prawa jako zinstytucjonalizowanej pamięci zbiorowej.

Słowa kluczowe

pamięć zbiorowa
instytucje
prawa pamięci
polityka pamięci

angielski

Abstract

This paper aims at explaining the concepts of collective memory, institutions, politics, law, as well as relations between them. By means of a short explanation of a network of mutual relations between these notions, we want to show how law and collective memories interact and how the relation between them is formed. At the same time, we see three modes of relations between collective memories and law: 1) past before the law, 2) memory laws and 3) law as collective memory. The first view consists in evaluating the past under a court trial. The second one in creating legal rules which promote or demand commemoration of a specific vision of the past. The third approach perceives law itself as institutionalized collective memory.

Keywords

collective memories
institutions
memory laws
politics of memory

Pełny tekst PDF Jak cytować

Bibliografia

32 pozycji bibliograficznych

Literatura

Arendt, H. (2006). Eichmann in Jerusalem. London: Penguin Press.
Bauman, Z. (2017). Retrotopia. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Beiser, F.C. (2012). The German Historicist Tradition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Belavusau, U., Gliszczynska -Grabias, A. (2017). Memory Laws: Mapping a New Subject in Comparative Law and Transitional Justice. In U. Belavusau, A. Gliszczyńska-Grabias (Eds.), Law and Memory: Towards Legal Governance of History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bucholc, M. (2019). Commemorative Lawmaking: Memory Frames of the Democratic Backsliding in Poland After 2015. Hague Journal on the Rule of Law 11, 85–110.
Connerton, P. (2003). How Societies Remember. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Connerton, P. (2009). How Modernity Forgets. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Czarnota, A. (2005). Between Nemesis and Justitia. Dealing with the past as a constitutional process. In A. Czarnota, M. Krygier, W. Sadu rski (Eds.), Rethinking the Rule of Law after Communism. Budapest: Central European University.
Cyuńczyk, F. (2019). Public Memory Sphere and its Legal Petrification. Few Remarks on the Legal Framework of the Institutes for National Remambrence Functioning in Poland. Visnyk of the Lviv University. Series Law 69, 3–11.
DiMaggio, P. (1997). Culture and Cognition. Annual Review of Sociology 23, 263–287.
Douglas, M. (1986). How Institutions Think. New York: Syracuse University Press.
Fraser, G. (2016 ). Why Adolf Eichmann’s final message remains so profoundly unsettling. The Guardian, https://www.theguardian.com/ [last access: 10.05.2020].
Fukuyama, F. (2018). Identity: The Demand for Dignity and the Politics of Resentment. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Giza, A. (2014). Czy społeczeństwu można przypisać podmiotowość. Zarządzanie Publiczne 3, 72–85.
Gready, P. (2010). The Era of Transitional Justice: The Aftermath of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission in South Africa and Beyond. New York: Routledge.
Halbwachs, M. (1992). On Collective Memory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Huyssen, A. (1995). Twilight Memories: Marking Time in a Culture of Amnesia. London: Routledge.
Shklar, J.D. (1989). The Liberalism of Fear. In N.L. Rosenblum (Ed.), Liberalism and the Moral Life. Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard University Press.
Johnson, D. P. (2008). Contemporary Sociological Theory: An Integrated Multi -Level Approach. Lubbock: Springer.
Loytomaki, S. (2014). Law and the Politics of Memory. Confronting the Past. New York: Routledge.
Maier, C.S. (1993). A Surfeit of Memory? Reflections on History, Melancholy and Denial. History and Memory 5/2, 136–152.
Margalit, A. (2004). The Ethics of Memory. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Maurantonio, N. (2014). The Politics of Memory. In K. Kenski, K. H. Jamieson ( Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Communication. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mink, G., Neumayer, L. (Eds.). (2013). History, Memory and Politics in Central and Eastern Europe. Memory Games. London: Springer.
Nonet, P., Selznick, P., Kagan, R.A. (2017). Law and Society in Transition. Toward Responsive Law. New York: Routledge.
Paździora, M. (2019). Constitutionalism in a Post-Conventional Society. The Critique of Law 11/1, 21– 22.
Savelsberg, J.J., King, R.D. (2007). Law and Collective Memory. Annual Review of Law and Social Science 3, 189–211.
Shklar, J. (1989). The Liberalism of Fear. In N.L. Rosenblum (Ed.), Liberalism and the Moral Life. Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard University Press.
Teubner, G. (1987). Juridification. Concepts, Aspects, Limits, Solutions. In G. Teubner ( Ed.), Juridification of Social Spheres. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Wagner, W.J. (1952). Codification of Law in Europe and the Codification Movement in the Middle of the Nineteenth Century in the United States. Saint Louis University Law Journal 1953, 335–359.
Zajadło, J. (2008). Po co prawnikom filozofia prawa. Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer Polska.
Zieliński, T. (1994). Ombudsman: możliwości i granice działania. Państwo i Prawo 1994/9, 3–15.

Informacje o publikacji

Autor i afiliacja

Justyna Jezierska

ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9153-8583

Autor i afiliacja

Michał Stambulski

ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4493-1272

Dane wydania

Numer nr 3(21)/2019

Strony: 6-21
Opublikowano: 2019
DOI: 10.36280/afpifs.2019.3.6
PDF: Pełny tekst PDF

DostępOpen LicencjaCC BY 4.0 ↗

Jak cytować

Opis bibliograficzny i zweryfikowane formaty eksportowe.

Format AFPiFS

A. Czarnota, J. Jezierska, M. Stambulski, Pamięci zbiorowe, instytucje i prawo, „Archiwum Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Społecznej” nr 3(21)/2019, s. 6–21, DOI: 10.36280/afpifs.2019.3.6

Eksportuj dane cytowania

[ref-001] Arendt, H. (2006). Eichmann in Jerusalem. London: Penguin Press.

[ref-002] Bauman, Z. (2017). Retrotopia. Cambridge: Polity Press.

[ref-003] Beiser, F.C. (2012). The German Historicist Tradition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

[ref-004] Belavusau, U., Gliszczynska -Grabias, A. (2017). Memory Laws: Mapping a New Subject in Comparative Law and Transitional Justice. In U. Belavusau, A. Gliszczyńska-Grabias (Eds.), Law and Memory: Towards Legal Governance of History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

[ref-005] Bucholc, M. (2019). Commemorative Lawmaking: Memory Frames of the Democratic Backsliding in Poland After 2015. Hague Journal on the Rule of Law 11, 85–110.

[ref-006] Connerton, P. (2003). How Societies Remember. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

[ref-007] Connerton, P. (2009). How Modernity Forgets. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

[ref-008] Czarnota, A. (2005). Between Nemesis and Justitia. Dealing with the past as a constitutional process. In A. Czarnota, M. Krygier, W. Sadu rski (Eds.), Rethinking the Rule of Law after Communism. Budapest: Central European University.

[ref-009] Cyuńczyk, F. (2019). Public Memory Sphere and its Legal Petrification. Few Remarks on the Legal Framework of the Institutes for National Remambrence Functioning in Poland. Visnyk of the Lviv University. Series Law 69, 3–11.

[ref-010] DiMaggio, P. (1997). Culture and Cognition. Annual Review of Sociology 23, 263–287.

[ref-011] Douglas, M. (1986). How Institutions Think. New York: Syracuse University Press.

[ref-012] Fraser, G. (2016 ). Why Adolf Eichmann’s final message remains so profoundly unsettling. The Guardian, https://www.theguardian.com/ [last access: 10.05.2020].

[ref-013] Fukuyama, F. (2018). Identity: The Demand for Dignity and the Politics of Resentment. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

[ref-014] Giza, A. (2014). Czy społeczeństwu można przypisać podmiotowość. Zarządzanie Publiczne 3, 72–85.

[ref-015] Gready, P. (2010). The Era of Transitional Justice: The Aftermath of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission in South Africa and Beyond. New York: Routledge.

[ref-016] Halbwachs, M. (1992). On Collective Memory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

[ref-017] Huyssen, A. (1995). Twilight Memories: Marking Time in a Culture of Amnesia. London: Routledge.

[ref-018] Shklar, J.D. (1989). The Liberalism of Fear. In N.L. Rosenblum (Ed.), Liberalism and the Moral Life. Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard University Press.

[ref-019] Johnson, D. P. (2008). Contemporary Sociological Theory: An Integrated Multi -Level Approach. Lubbock: Springer.

[ref-020] Loytomaki, S. (2014). Law and the Politics of Memory. Confronting the Past. New York: Routledge.

[ref-021] Maier, C.S. (1993). A Surfeit of Memory? Reflections on History, Melancholy and Denial. History and Memory 5/2, 136–152.

[ref-022] Margalit, A. (2004). The Ethics of Memory. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

[ref-023] Maurantonio, N. (2014). The Politics of Memory. In K. Kenski, K. H. Jamieson ( Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Communication. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

[ref-024] Mink, G., Neumayer, L. (Eds.). (2013). History, Memory and Politics in Central and Eastern Europe. Memory Games. London: Springer.

[ref-025] Nonet, P., Selznick, P., Kagan, R.A. (2017). Law and Society in Transition. Toward Responsive Law. New York: Routledge.

[ref-026] Paździora, M. (2019). Constitutionalism in a Post-Conventional Society. The Critique of Law 11/1, 21– 22.

[ref-027] Savelsberg, J.J., King, R.D. (2007). Law and Collective Memory. Annual Review of Law and Social Science 3, 189–211.

[ref-028] Shklar, J. (1989). The Liberalism of Fear. In N.L. Rosenblum (Ed.), Liberalism and the Moral Life. Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard University Press.

[ref-029] Teubner, G. (1987). Juridification. Concepts, Aspects, Limits, Solutions. In G. Teubner ( Ed.), Juridification of Social Spheres. Berlin: De Gruyter.

[ref-030] Wagner, W.J. (1952). Codification of Law in Europe and the Codification Movement in the Middle of the Nineteenth Century in the United States. Saint Louis University Law Journal 1953, 335–359.

[ref-031] Zajadło, J. (2008). Po co prawnikom filozofia prawa. Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer Polska.

[ref-032] Zieliński, T. (1994). Ombudsman: możliwości i granice działania. Państwo i Prawo 1994/9, 3–15.

Pamięci zbiorowe, instytucje i prawo

Abstrakt

Słowa kluczowe

Abstract

Keywords

Bibliografia

Literatura

Informacje o publikacji

Justyna Jezierska

Michał Stambulski

Numer nr 3(21)/2019

Jak cytować

Format AFPiFS

ACM

ACS

APA

ABNT

Chicago

Harvard

IEEE

MLA

Turabian

Vancouver

OSCOLA

Eksportuj dane cytowania