Research article
Philosophical Roots of the Dialogical Concept of Law
Philosophical Roots of the Dialogical Concept of Law
Archiwum Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Społecznej, nr 2(13)/2016, s. 51-58
polski
Abstrakt
The main task which I pose for myself is to indicate the philosophical roots of the dialogical concept of law. First and foremost, I would like to present dialogue in the context of ancient Greek philosophy and in the context of the classicists of the philosophy of dialogue. Furthermore, I seek phenomenological bases for constructing the dialogical concept of law. The phenomenological method, starting with its classical Husserlian form, has undergone many changes. Thanks to the indication of new horizons of phenomenology by Emmanuel Levinas, discovering dialogical consciousness and the subject constituted in being with the Other are possible. The reference point of reflections on the concept of law is the relationship with the Other as an ethical relationship. Philosophy of dialogue is a certain possible prism of thinking about the social, public, and institutional space. It is thinking through the prism of dialogue (speaking), but also through the third who contributes discourse relevant to what is said. Law as the third, as the mediating element, is a co-constituting element of the entire legal world.
angielski
Abstract
The main task which I pose for myself is to indicate the philosophical roots of the dialogical concept of law. First and foremost, I would like to present dialogue in the context of ancient Greek philosophy and in the context of the classicists of the philosophy of dialogue. Furthermore, I seek phenomenological bases for constructing the dialogical concept of law. The phenomenological method, starting with its classical Husserlian form, has undergone many changes. Thanks to the indication of new horizons of phenomenology by Emmanuel Levinas, discovering dialogical consciousness and the subject constituted in being with the Other are possible. The reference point of reflections on the concept of law is the relationship with the Other as an ethical relationship. Philosophy of dialogue is a certain possible prism of thinking about the social, public, and institutional space. It is thinking through the prism of dialogue (speaking), but also through the third who contributes discourse relevant to what is said. Law as the third, as the mediating element, is a co-constituting element of the entire legal world.
Keywords
- dialogue
- philosophy of dialogue
- encounter
- phenomenology
- the Other
- existentialism
- subject
- ethical relationship
- difference
- logos
Bibliografia
13 pozycji bibliograficznych
Literatura
-
Buber, M. (1970). I and Thou. New York:
-
Chmura, M. (2007). Zanim umrze Iwan Iljicz. Perypetie podmiotu w filozofii Emmanuela Levinasa. Warszawa: Wydawnictwa Akademickie i Profesjonalne.
-
Filek, J. (2010). Życie, etyka, inni. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Homini.
-
Foucault, M. (2006). Słowa i rzeczy. Archeologia nauk humanistycznych. Gdańsk: Słowo/Obraz Terytoria.
-
Levinas, E. (2000). Inaczej niż być lub ponad istotą. Warszawa: Aletheia.
-
Luijpen, W.A. (1972). Fenomenologia egzystencjalna. Warszawa:
-
Migasiński, J. (2014). W stronę metafizyki. Nowe tendencje metafizyczne. Toruń: Wydawnictwo UMK.
-
Sartre, J.P. (2007). Byt i nicość. Zarys ontologii fenomenologicznej. Kraków: Martino Publishing.
-
Siemek, M. (2000). Logos jako dialogos. Greckie źródła intersubiektywnej racjonalności. Principia 27- 28, 75–98.
-
Szulakiewicz, M. (2006). Dialog i metafizyka. W poszukiwaniu nowej filozofii pierwszej. Toruń: Adam Marszałek.
-
Theunissen, M. (1977). Der Andere. Berlin–New York: De Gruyter.
-
Tischner, J. (1990). Kryzys myślenia. In K. Michalski (ed.), O kryzysie. Rozmowy w Castel Gandolfo. Warszawa: Res Publica.
-
Žižek, S., Santner, E.L., Reinhard, K. (2013). Bliźni. Warszawa: PWN.
Informacje o publikacji
Dane wydania
Numer nr 2(13)/2016
- Strony
- 51-58
- Opublikowano
Jak cytować
Opis bibliograficzny i zweryfikowane formaty eksportowe.
Format AFPiFS
A. Rossmanith, Philosophical Roots of the Dialogical Concept of Law, „Archiwum Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Społecznej” nr 2(13)/2016, s. 51–58, DOI: 10.36280/afpifs.2016.2.51
ACM
[1] Anna Rossmanith. 2016. Philosophical Roots of the Dialogical Concept of Law. AFPiFS 2(13) (2016), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.36280/afpifs.2016.2.51
ACS
(1) Rossmanith, A. Philosophical Roots of the Dialogical Concept of Law. AFPiFS 2016, No. 2(13), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.36280/afpifs.2016.2.51.
APA
Rossmanith, A. (2016). Philosophical Roots of the Dialogical Concept of Law. Archiwum Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Społecznej, 2(13), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.36280/afpifs.2016.2.51
ABNT
ROSSMANITH, Anna. Philosophical Roots of the Dialogical Concept of Law. Archiwum Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Społecznej, n. 2(13), p. 51–58, 2016.
Chicago
Rossmanith, Anna. “Philosophical Roots of the Dialogical Concept of Law.” Archiwum Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Społecznej, no. 2(13) (2016): 51–58. https://doi.org/10.36280/afpifs.2016.2.51.
Harvard
Rossmanith, A. (2016) “Philosophical Roots of the Dialogical Concept of Law,” Archiwum Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Społecznej, 2(13), pp. 51–58. Available at: https://doi.org/10.36280/afpifs.2016.2.51.
IEEE
[1] A. Rossmanith, “Philosophical Roots of the Dialogical Concept of Law,” AFPiFS, no. 2(13), pp. 51–58, 2016, doi: 10.36280/afpifs.2016.2.51.
MLA
Rossmanith, Anna. “Philosophical Roots of the Dialogical Concept of Law.” Archiwum Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Społecznej, no. 2(13), 2016, pp. 51–58, https://doi.org/10.36280/afpifs.2016.2.51.
Turabian
Rossmanith, Anna. “Philosophical Roots of the Dialogical Concept of Law.” Archiwum Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Społecznej, no. 2(13) (2016): 51–58. https://doi.org/10.36280/afpifs.2016.2.51.
Vancouver
1. Rossmanith A. Philosophical Roots of the Dialogical Concept of Law. AFPiFS. 2016;2(13):51–8. doi:10.36280/afpifs.2016.2.51
OSCOLA
Anna Rossmanith, ‘Philosophical Roots of the Dialogical Concept of Law’ (2016) 2(13) AFPiFS 51 <https://doi.org/10.36280/afpifs.2016.2.51>.