Archiwum Filozofii Prawai Filozofii Społecznej

Journal of the Polish Section of IVR (ISSN:2082-3304)

IVRwww.ivr.org.pl
  • About us
  • Aim & scope
  • News
  • Issues
    • Current issue
    • Past Issues
  • Editorial board
    • Board Members
    • Reviewers
  • For authors
  • Ethics
  • Contact
  • Polski

From Tischner’s Critique of the Understanding of Work in Marxism to the Apotheosis of Work as Dialogue

Opublikowano: 2021-11-30
Issues>Number 4(29)/2021>Research article
Michał StachurskiDOI: 10.36280/AFPiFS.2021.4.71

Article tools

Full-text PDFNumber 4(29)/2021Polish version
Language: EnglishPublished: Number 4(29)/2021, pp. 71-81.Number of downloads: 602

In this issue

Back to issue table of contents
← Previous textA Wisdom of Chinese Aphorisms. A Few Remarks on the Philosophy of Criminal Law between Chinese and European RudimentalsTomasz SnarskiNext text →On Gustav Radbruch’s Notion of Antinomies of the Idea of LawBartosz Szyler

Mgr Michał Stachurski

University of Opole

Keywords: work, Tischner, dialogue, existentialism, social ethics

English abstract: Philosophy, being a field that looks for answers to various questions, does not overlook topics related to human work and technology. Usually, reflection is arranged along two axes: the economic and ethical one. These questions are a tool to attempt to define the value of human work as precisely as possible, also within the framework of axiology. The topic of work and its importance in human life was also taken up by Józef Tischner. He is counted as a representative of such trends as the philosophy of meeting or personalism. The aim of this article is to show what work is in Józef Tischner’s thought, what its goals are, and how Józef Tischner characterized the ‘man of work’ within the philosophy of dialogue, as well as a certain interpretation of Tischner’s thought in the context of contemporary existential philosophy and social ethics.

This text is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial – No Derivative Works 4.0 International License.

Cite this articleAPA, Chicago, OSCOLA, BibTeX, RIS

M. Stachurski (2021) From Tischner’s Critique of the Understanding of Work in Marxism to the Apotheosis of Work as Dialogue. Archiwum Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Społecznej, 2021, no. 4(29), 71-81. https://doi.org/10.36280/AFPiFS.2021.4.71.

License: CC BY 4.0DOIHTMLPDFIssueBibTeXRISJATS XMLMichał StachurskiworkTischnerdialogueexistentialismsocial ethics Language: Polish

Filed Under: Articles Tagged With: dialogue, existentialism, social ethics, Tischner, work

Submit article

Contact

archiwum@ivr.org.pl

Editorial secretary: dr Karolina Gmerek (karolina.gmerek@usz.edu.pl)

See guidelines for authors

fFacebook

Current issue

Cover of AFPiFS issue 2(47)/2026
Issue 2(47)/2026

Indexing

  • 100 pts.on the Polish ministerial journal list
  • ScopusScopus
  • ERIH PLUSERIH PLUS
  • DOAJDOAJ
  • Crossref DOICrossref DOI

ISSN: 2082-3304

Journal metadata and indexing services.

Standards and presence
Journal developmentJournal developmentOpen AccessCC BY 4.0CC BY 4.0

Most searched articles

  1. Agonizm polityczny a myślenie o prawie i prawoznawstwieAuthors: Jerzy Leszczyński
  2. Zasada nullum crimen sine lege jako źródło poszukiwania językowej granicy wykładni prawa karnego?Authors: Sławomir Tkacz
  3. Superfluum and surpluses of meaning as examples of redundancy of the text of lawAuthors: Maciej Kłodawski
  4. Pewność prawa a zasada interpretatio retro non agitAuthors: Agnieszka Bielska-Brodziak; Marek Suska
  5. Hans Kelsen as Outliner: The Defence of a Radical Norm TheoryAuthors: Stanley L. Paulson
  6. Cztery zagadki o rządach prawa:Dlaczego? Co? Gdzie? I kogo to obchodzi? Część IIAuthors: Martin Krygier
  7. Kant, Korsgaard i podmiotowość moralna zwierzątAuthors: Tomasz Pietrzykowski
  8. Robert Alexy’s Theory of Legal PrinciplesAuthors: Milena Korycka
  9. Why Legal Conventionalism FailsAuthors: Adam Dyrda
  10. Paweł Włodkowic i jego zapomniana koncepcja wojny sprawiedliwejAuthors: Tomasz Tulejski

Based on Google Search Console data.

Szukaj

Categories

  • Articles
  • Bez kategorii
  • Editorial
  • In Memoriam
  • News
  • Reports
  • Reviews and discussions
Journal infrastructureISSN 2082-3304Open accessCC BY 4.0Crossref DOIDOAJ

Copyright © 2026 Polska Sekcja Międzynarodowego Stowarzyszenia Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Społecznej IVR | Administrator strony: Karolina Gmerek

Ta strona używa plików cookies. Zakładamy, że wyrażają Państwo na to zgodę, ale mogą Państwo także wyłączyć pliki cookies w Ustawieniach. //
This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. (Zob. więcej // Read more) Ustawienia // SettingsZGODA // ACCEPT

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT