Research article

Hegel’s Critics on Legal Profession

Article authors
  1. Maksymilian Hau

Heglowska krytyka stanu prawniczego

Archiwum Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Społecznej, nr 3(28)/2021, s. 69-81

English

Abstract

The aim of the article is a question about the actuality of the Hegelian concept of law, presented in the Principles of the philosophy of law. For Hegel, the law is the most important element in the structure of a capitalist society, because it funds the mutual recognition of individuals, which gives social relationships a foundation not in the dialectic of rule and servitude, but in the submission of all authorities to general legal norms. The analysis of selected contemporary practices that allow for the choice of jurisdiction calls into question the Hegelian concept, since these practices show that the general principle is broken – abstract norms of law no longer have to apply to everyone. The second part of the article is devoted to the analysis of criticism of legal profession to which Hegel accused the responsibility for alienating the law from society and thus blurring the relationship between law and freedom. The question will be asked whether Hegel’s criticism can be applied to contemporary problems in the relationship between law and society. Whether the law continues to be, as Hegel wanted it to be, a rational means of meeting the needs of individuals, or whether, on the contrary, it is increasingly becoming a source of exploitation.

Keywords

  • Hegel
  • Principles of philosophy of law
  • recognition
  • exploitation
  • legal profession
Full text PDF How to cite

References

14 reference entries

References

  1. Avinieri S. (2009). Hegla teoria nowoczesnego państwa. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo

  2. Naukowe PWN.

  3. Benhabib S. (1984). Obligation, contract and exchange: On the significance of Hegel's abstract right. In Z. A. Pełczyński (ed.) The state and civil society: Studies in Hegel's Political Philosophy. London: Cambridge University Press.

  4. Halpérin J. L. (2011). Law in books and law in action: the problem of legal change. Maine Law Review 64(1), 45–76.

  5. Hegel G. W. F. (1969). Zasady filozofii prawa. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.

  6. Monteskiusz (2002). O duchu praw (T. Tadeusz Boy-Żeleński trans.). Warszawa: De Agostini Atlaya.

  7. Pełczyński Z. A. (1998). Wolność, państwo, społeczeństwo. Hegel a problemy współczesnej filozofii politycznej. Wrocław: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego.

  8. Platon (2017). Kriton. Kraków – Warszawa: Teologia Polityczna.

  9. Platon (2019). Protagoras. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Aletheia.

  10. Siemek M. J. (1995). Filozofia spełnionej nowoczesności – Hegel. Toruń: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Mikołaja Kopernika.

  11. Simmel G. (2012). Filozofia pieniądza. Warszawa: Aletheia.

  12. Stawrowski Z. (1994). Państwo i prawo w filozofii Hegla. Kraków: Wydawnictwo

  13. Naukowe PAT.

  14. Szymaniec P. (2008). Heglowski model nowoczesnego państwa. Wrocławskie Studia Erazmiańskie 2, 21–40.

Publication information

Author and affiliation

Maksymilian Hau

Uniwersytet Warszawski

Issue data

Issue nr 3(28)/2021

Pages
69-81
Published

How to cite

Bibliographic description and verified export formats.

Format AFPiFS

M. Hau, Hegel’s Critics on Legal Profession, „Archiwum Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Społecznej” nr 3(28)/2021, s. 69–81, DOI: 10.36280/afpifs.2021.3.69