Archiwum Filozofii Prawai Filozofii Społecznej

Journal of the Polish Section of IVR (ISSN:2082-3304)

IVRwww.ivr.org.pl
  • About us
  • Aim & scope
  • News
  • Issues
    • Current issue
    • Past Issues
  • Editorial board
    • Board Members
    • Reviewers
  • For authors
  • Ethics
  • Contact
  • Polski

Private Property and Its Social Dimension in the Views of Rudolf von Jhering and Otto von Gierke

Opublikowano: 2023-06-06
Issues>Number 1(34)/2023>Research article
Paweł LesińskiDOI: 10.36280//AFPiFS.2023.1.46

Article tools

Full-text PDFNumber 1(34)/2023Polish version
Language: EnglishPublished: Number 1(34)/2023, pp. 46-57.Number of downloads: 359

In this issue

Back to issue table of contents
← Previous text‘Tacit’ Declarations of Intent: Considerations in the Context of the Normative Concept of OmissionKarolina GmerekNext text →Terminological Consistency in the Legal System. A View at the Problem of Interpretation from the Perspective of Law-making PracticeMarek Suska

Dr Paweł LESIŃSKI

Maria Curie-Skłodowska University in Lublin

Keywords: private property, Rudolf von Jhering, Otto von Gierke, community, social obligation

English abstract: The article is an attempt to analyse the views of Rudolf von Jhering and Otto von Gierke views on the question of social dimension of private property. These two German lawyers formulated their ideas during the period of search for the solutions to socio-economic problems regarding private property and its scope. They both represented essentially identical views on the importance of private property in the context of its existence in the community. In order to fulfill the research task described above, the article firstly analyses the historical and ideological background for solutions to the problems of private property in Germany in 19th century. Secondly, the article examines the question of the individual’s position within the community in the thought of Jhering and Gierke. The third part of the article analyses the views of these scholars on the essence of the legal order in the context of private property. The last part of the article refers to their views on private property perceived as a  phenomenon which by definition includes limitations and results in both rights and obligations for the owner.

This text is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial – No Derivative Works 4.0 International License.

Cite this articleAPA, Chicago, OSCOLA, BibTeX, RIS

P. Lesiński (2023) Private Property and Its Social Dimension in the Views of Rudolf von Jhering and Otto von Gierke. Archiwum Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Społecznej, 2023, no. 1(34), 46-57. https://doi.org/10.36280//AFPiFS.2023.1.46.

License: CC BY 4.0DOIHTMLPDFIssueBibTeXRISJATS XMLPaweł Lesińskiprivate propertyRudolf von JheringOtto von Gierkecommunitysocial obligation Language: Polish

Filed Under: Articles Tagged With: community, Otto von Gierke, private property, Rudolf von Jhering, social obligation

Submit article

Contact

archiwum@ivr.org.pl

Editorial secretary: dr Karolina Gmerek (karolina.gmerek@usz.edu.pl)

See guidelines for authors

fFacebook

Current issue

Cover of AFPiFS issue 2(47)/2026
Issue 2(47)/2026

Indexing

  • 100 pts.on the Polish ministerial journal list
  • ScopusScopus
  • ERIH PLUSERIH PLUS
  • DOAJDOAJ
  • Crossref DOICrossref DOI

ISSN: 2082-3304

Journal metadata and indexing services.

Standards and presence
Journal developmentJournal developmentOpen AccessCC BY 4.0CC BY 4.0

Most searched articles

  1. Agonizm polityczny a myślenie o prawie i prawoznawstwieAuthors: Jerzy Leszczyński
  2. Zasada nullum crimen sine lege jako źródło poszukiwania językowej granicy wykładni prawa karnego?Authors: Sławomir Tkacz
  3. Superfluum and surpluses of meaning as examples of redundancy of the text of lawAuthors: Maciej Kłodawski
  4. Pewność prawa a zasada interpretatio retro non agitAuthors: Agnieszka Bielska-Brodziak; Marek Suska
  5. Hans Kelsen as Outliner: The Defence of a Radical Norm TheoryAuthors: Stanley L. Paulson
  6. Cztery zagadki o rządach prawa:Dlaczego? Co? Gdzie? I kogo to obchodzi? Część IIAuthors: Martin Krygier
  7. Kant, Korsgaard i podmiotowość moralna zwierzątAuthors: Tomasz Pietrzykowski
  8. Robert Alexy’s Theory of Legal PrinciplesAuthors: Milena Korycka
  9. Why Legal Conventionalism FailsAuthors: Adam Dyrda
  10. Paweł Włodkowic i jego zapomniana koncepcja wojny sprawiedliwejAuthors: Tomasz Tulejski

Based on Google Search Console data.

Szukaj

Categories

  • Articles
  • Bez kategorii
  • Editorial
  • In Memoriam
  • News
  • Reports
  • Reviews and discussions
Journal infrastructureISSN 2082-3304Open accessCC BY 4.0Crossref DOIDOAJ

Copyright © 2026 Polska Sekcja Międzynarodowego Stowarzyszenia Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Społecznej IVR | Administrator strony: Karolina Gmerek

Ta strona używa plików cookies. Zakładamy, że wyrażają Państwo na to zgodę, ale mogą Państwo także wyłączyć pliki cookies w Ustawieniach. //
This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. (Zob. więcej // Read more) Ustawienia // SettingsZGODA // ACCEPT

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT