Research article

Story of a footnote. Attempt to reconstruct the discussion of Hans Kelsen and Jerzy Wróblewski

Article authors
  1. Monika Zalewska

Historia pewnego przypisu. Próba rekonstrukcji dyskusji Hansa Kelsena z Jerzym Wróblewskim

Archiwum Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Społecznej, nr 1(2)/2011, s. 75-85

English

Abstract

Article is an attempt to provide reconstruction of the discourse between Hans Kelsen and Jerzy Wróblewski. The main motive of the article are three footnotes from Hans Kelsen’s General Theory of Norms where he considers such issues as the meaning of the legal norm, and legal interpretation. Reconstruction leads to conclusion that if one treats H. Kelsen’s argumentation as a critique of Jerzy Wróblewski’s theory, this critique doesn’t have sound basis, because it’s essence is not to point contradictions and weakness of the theory, but it is led from the point of view of pure theory of law which itself at some points suffers from the lack of coherency. Thus the other approach of the interpretation of footnotes is offered, to treat them as an some kind of scientific testimony, and as a tool which has on scope to make improvement in pure theory of law. Additionally it has been pointed out, that Hans Kelsen didn’t put the main interest on Marxist issues which occurred in Jerzy Wróblewski’s theory, but on those elements which have it’s importance and are discussed till present day.

Keywords

  • Hans Kelsen
  • Jerzy Wroblewski
  • legal interpretation
  • normativism
Full text PDF How to cite

References

16 reference entries

References

  1. Adomeit K. (1982). Der Begriff der Rechtsnorm. Schriftenreihe des Hans Kelsen -Institutes. Band 7. Wien.

  2. Ebenstein W. (1971). The Pure Theory of Law: Demythologizing Legal Thought. California Law Review, 59(3), 617-652.

  3. Fritzsche T. (2002). Die Reine Rechtslehre im Lichte des Kritischen Rationalismus. Schriftenreihe des Hans Kelsens – Instituts. Band 23. Wien.

  4. Kelsen H. (1960). Hauptprobleme der Staatsrechtslehre. Aalen: Scientia Verlag.

  5. Kelsen H. (1960). Reine Rechtslehre. Wien: Verlag Österreich.

  6. Kelsen H. (1979). Allgemeine Theorie der Normen. Wien: MANZ Verlag.

  7. Kucsko-Stadlmayer G. (1992). Rechtsnormbegriff und Arten der Rechtnormen. Schriften des Hans Kelsen – Instituts. Band 18. Wien.

  8. Opałek K. (1982). Norm. Wert. und Werturteil. Schriftreihe des Hans Kelsen – Institutes. Band 7. Wien.

  9. Paulson S.L. (1988). An Empowerment Theory of Legal Norm. Ratio Iuris 1(1), 58-72.

  10. Paulson S.L. & Litschewsky-Paulson B. (1998). Normativity and Norms. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  11. Paulson S.L. (2005). Zwei radykale Objektivirungsprogramme In der Rechtslehre Hans Kelsens. In S. L. Paulson, M. Stolleis (Eds.). Hans Kelsen Staatslehrer und Rechtstheoretiker des 20. Jahrhunderts. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.

  12. Raz J. (1981). The Purity of the Pure Theory. Revue Internationale de Philosophie 35(138), 441-459.

  13. Schreirer F. (1982). Rechtsnorm und Rechtssatz. Schriftenreihe des Hans Kelsen – Institutes. Band 7. Wien.

  14. Wróblewski J. (1963). Semantic Basis of the Theory of Legal Interpretaton. Logique at Analyse, 21–24, 397-415.

  15. Wróblewski J. (1964). The Problem of the Meaning of the Legal Norm. Österreiches Zeitschrift Für Öffentliches Recht, 3–4, 253-266.

  16. Wróblewski J. (1988). Cognition of Norms and Cognition Through Norms. In G. di Bernardo (Ed.). Normative Structures of the Social World. Amsterdam: Rodopi.

Publication information

Author and affiliation

Monika Zalewska

Uniwersytet Łódzki

Issue data

Issue nr 1(2)/2011

Pages
75-85
Published
AccessOtwarty LicenceCC BY 4.0 ↗

How to cite

Bibliographic description and verified export formats.

Format AFPiFS

M. Zalewska, Story of a footnote. Attempt to reconstruct the discussion of Hans Kelsen and Jerzy Wróblewski, „Archiwum Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Społecznej” nr 1(2)/2011, s. 75–85, DOI: 10.36280/afpifs.2011.1.75