Keywords: God, monism, pluralism, religion, Isaiah Berlin
English abstract: Against Beata Polanowksa-Sygulska (BP-S), I insist on the incompatibility between the pluralism of comprehensive world-views and belief in the monist, universalist tenets of the principal world religions, noting that God the Father and God the Son were both monists. I argue that my position is entailed by Isaiah Berlin’s rejection of the unique truth of any one comprehensive outlook, and that both Berlin and BP-S confuse toleration with acceptance. I reject the charges that my position is monistic, and that I give insufficient attention to conflict within individual values, which can in any case be treated as conflict between values.
Cite this articleAPA, Chicago, OSCOLA, BibTeX, RIS
H. Hardy (2020) God’s Monism: A Further Reply to Beata Polanowska-Sygulska. Archiwum Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Społecznej, 2020, no. 3(24), 130-132. https://doi.org/10.36280/AFPiFS.2020.3.130.
