Research article

Around Selected Themes in the Moral Philosophy of Joseph Raz. Part II

Article authors
  1. Beata Polanowska-Sygulska

Wokół wybranych wątków filozofii moralnej Josepha Raza. Część II

Archiwum Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Społecznej, nr 2(43)/2025, s. 42-57

English

Abstract

Part II of this essay is devoted to a critique of Joseph Raz’s achievements in the field of political and moral philosophy. It begins by questioning the elaborate conception of personal auton- omy that underlies his perfectionist liberal doctrine. Confronted with contemporary alarmist diagnoses by Siva Vaidhyanathan and Shoshana Zuboff, who proclaim the twilight of the ideal of autonomy – in the wake of the destructive impact of social media and the birth of so-called surveillance capitalism – J. Raz’s sophisticated vision appears anachronistic. Secondly, the phi- losopher’s use of the category of group rights and the unconvincing line of defence in his po- lemic on the same topic with Susan Moller Okin and Yael Tamir are rejected. Thirdly, J. Raz’s con- tribution to the global debate on human rights in the form of the political conception of human rights that he formulated is criticised from many angles. Fourthly, and finally, a question mark is placed over his surprisingly positive assessment of Ronald Dworkin’s monist ethical conception, developed by the latter in his philosophical credo Justice for Hedgehogs. As interpreted in both parts of this essay, Dworkin’s vision runs completely counter to J. Raz’s moral philosophy. It is therefore difficult to understand the reverence that the Oxford philosopher seems to have for the monistic project presented by the author of Justice for Hedgehogs. The essay concludes by pointing out that, whatever reservations and doubts one may have about J. Raz’s political and moral philosophy, the importance of his contributions to both fields is beyond question.

Keywords

  • Joseph Raz
  • perfectionist liberalism
  • personal autonomy
  • group rights as a category
  • political conception of human rights
  • Ronald Dworkin
  • ethical monism
Full text PDF How to cite

References

24 reference entries

References

  1. Barry B., Culture & Equality: An Egalitarian Critique of Multiculturalism, Polity Press, Cambridge 2001.

  2. Berlin I., Jeż i lis. Esej o pojmowaniu historii u Tołstoja, tłum. A. Konarek, H. Krzeczkowski, K. Tarnow-ska, Aletheia Pavo, Warszawa 1993.

  3. Dworkin R., Justice for Hedgehogs, The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass. – London 2011.

  4. Miller D., Joseph Raz on Human Rights: A Critical Appraisal, w: Philosophical Foundations of Human Rights, eds. S. Cruft, M. Liao, M. Renzo, Oxford University Press, Oxford – New York 2015.

  5. Moller Okin S., Is Multiculturalism Bad for Women?, w: Is Multiculturalism Bad for Women?, eds. J. Cohen, M. Howard, M.C. Nussbaum, Princeton University Press, Princeton 1999.

  6. Polanowska-Sygulska B., Pluralizm wartości i jego implikacje w filozofii prawa, Księgarnia Akade -micka, Kraków 2008.

  7. Polanowska-Sygulska B., Harmonia i dysonans. Wokół rozmów z oksfordzkimi filozofami, Księgar -nia Akademicka, Kraków 2022.

  8. Polanowska-Sygulska B., Wokół wybranych wątków filozofii moralnej Josepha Raza. Część I, „Archi-wum Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Społecznej” 2025, nr 1(42), s. 60–76.

  9. Popper K., Conjectures and Refutations, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London 1923.

  10. Raz J., A Hedgehog Unity of Value, w: The Legacy of Ronald Dworkin, eds. W. Waluchow, S. Sciaraffa, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2016.

  11. Raz J., Comments and Responses, w: Rights, Culture and the Law: Themes from the Legal and Politi-cal Philosophy of Joseph Raz, eds. L.H. Meyer, S.L. Paulson, T.W. Pogge, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2003.

  12. Raz J., How Perfect Should One Be? And Whose Culture Is?, w: Is Multiculturalism Bad for Women?, eds. J. Cohen, M. Howard, M.C. Nussbaum, Princeton University Press, Princeton 1999.

  13. Raz J., Human Rights in the Emerging World Order, „Transnational Legal Theory” 2010, vol. 1, s. 31–47.

  14. Raz J., Human Rights Without Foundations, w: The Philosophy of International Law, eds. S. Besson, J. Tasioulas, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2010.

  15. Raz J., On Waldron’s Critique of Raz on Human Rights, w: Human Rights: Moral or Political?, ed. A. Etinson, Oxford University Press, Oxford – New York 2018.

  16. Raz J., The Morality of Freedom, Clarendon Press, Oxford 1986.

  17. Raz J., Value, Respect and Attachment, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2001.

  18. Raz J., Margalit A., The Right to National Self-Determination, w: J. Raz, Ethics in the Public Domain: Essays in the Morality of Law and Politics, Clarendon Press, Oxford 1994.

  19. Tamir Y., Against Collective Rights, w: Rights, Culture and the Law: Themes from the Legal and Politi-cal Philosophy of Joseph Raz, eds. L.H. Meyer, S.L. Paulson, T.W. Pogge, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2003.

  20. Tasioulas J., Saving Human Rights from Human Rights Law, „Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law” 2019, vol. 52, no. 4, s. 1167–1207.

  21. Vaidhyanayhan S., Antisocial media. Jak Facebook oddala nas od siebie i zagraża demokracji, tłum. W. Mincer, K. Sosnowska, Wydawnictwo W.A.B., Warszawa 2018.

  22. Waldron J., Human Rights: A Critique of the Raz/Rawls Approach, w: Human Rights: Moral or Politi-cal?, ed. A. Etinson, Oxford University Press, Oxford – New York 2018.

  23. Waluchow W., Sciarafffa S. (eds.), The Legacy of Ronald Dworkin, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2016.

  24. Zuboff S., Wiek kapitalizmu inwigilacji. Walka o przyszłość ludzkości na nowej granicy władzy, tłum. A. Underschuetz, Wydawnictwo Zysk i S-ka, Poznań 2020.

Publication information

Author and affiliation

Beata Polanowska-Sygulska

Uniwersytet Jagielloński w Krakowie

Issue data

Issue nr 2(43)/2025

Pages
42-57
Published
AccessOtwarty LicenceCC BY 4.0 ↗

How to cite

Bibliographic description and verified export formats.

Format AFPiFS

B. Polanowska-Sygulska, Around Selected Themes in the Moral Philosophy of Joseph Raz. Part II, „Archiwum Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Społecznej” nr 2(43)/2025, s. 42–57, DOI: 10.36280/afpifs.2025.2.42