Archiwum Filozofii Prawai Filozofii Społecznej

Journal of the Polish Section of IVR (ISSN:2082-3304)

IVRwww.ivr.org.pl
  • About us
  • Aim & scope
  • News
  • Issues
    • Current issue
    • Past Issues
    • Thematic Collections
  • Editorial board
    • Board Members
    • Reviewers
  • For authors
  • Ethics
  • Contact
  • Polski

Freedom of Academic Debate: For All or for the Chosen Ones? Students’ Attitudes Towards Freedom of Speech Limits for Academics

Opublikowano: 2025-11-25
Issues>Number 4(2025)>Research article
Ewa IlczukAndrzej PorębskiDOI: 10.36280/AFPiFS.2025.4.21

Article tools

Full-text PDFNumber 4(2025)Polish version
Language: EnglishPublished: Number 4(2025), pp. 21-45.

In this issue

Back to issue table of contents
← Previous textFreedom of Speech of an Academic Teacher: Some Conceptual Clarifications and a Landscape of ChallengesPaweł Jabłoński; Przemysław Kaczmarek; Mateusz WojtanowskiNext text →Between Protection and Restriction: Academic Freedom in the Case Law of Turkish Administrative Courts Through the Lens of Frederick SchauerMuhammet Koçakgöl; Olcay Karacan

Mgr Ewa Ilczuk, Mgr Andrzej Porębski

Jagiellonian University

Keywords: academic debate, freedom of speech, academic freedom, cancel culture, punitiveness, worldview

English abstract: The results show that students relatively commonly demand that such persons be dismissed from the university or banned from academic activities: application of the harshest consequences was proposed at least once by 38% of respondents. The survey also showed that the respondents’ worldview had a key influence on their decisions: when it was in line with the worldview described in the story, respondents were much more accepting. Meanwhile, neither gender, age, nor the declared value attributed to freedom of speech were significant predictors of acceptance. The obtained results significantly contribute to the discussion about contemporary trends in freedom of speech restriction in academia. They should be taken into account when planning actions aiming at safeguarding academic freedoms. They can also help better understand the sources of academic punitiveness and draw attention to the risks associated with its subjective nature.

Language: polish

Published: Number 4(2025), pp. 21–45.

Download file

Number of downloads: Invalid download ID.

This text is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Cite this articleAPA, Chicago, OSCOLA, BibTeX, RIS

E. Ilczuk, A. Porębski (2025) Freedom of Academic Debate: For All or for the Chosen Ones? Students’ Attitudes Towards Freedom of Speech Limits for Academics. Archiwum Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Społecznej, 2025, Number 4(2025), 21-45. https://doi.org/10.36280/AFPiFS.2025.4.21.

License: CC BY 4.0DOIHTMLPDFIssueBibTeXRISJATS XMLEwa IlczukAndrzej Porębskiacademic debatefreedom of speechacademic freedomcancel culturepunitivenessworldview Language: polish

Filed Under: Articles Tagged With: academic debate, academic freedom, cancel culture, freedom of speech, punitiveness, worldview

Submit article

Contact

archiwum@ivr.org.pl

Editorial secretary: dr Karolina Gmerek (karolina.gmerek@usz.edu.pl)

See guidelines for authors

fFacebook

Current issue

Cover of AFPiFS issue 2(47)/2026
Issue 2(47)/2026

Indexing

  • 100 pts.on the Polish ministerial journal list
  • ScopusScopus
  • ERIH PLUSERIH PLUS
  • DOAJDOAJ
  • Crossref DOICrossref DOI

ISSN: 2082-3304

Journal metadata and indexing services.

Standards and presence
Journal developmentJournal developmentOpen AccessCC BY 4.0CC BY 4.0

Most searched articles

  1. Agonizm polityczny a myślenie o prawie i prawoznawstwieAuthors: Jerzy Leszczyński
  2. Zasada nullum crimen sine lege jako źródło poszukiwania językowej granicy wykładni prawa karnego?Authors: Sławomir Tkacz
  3. Superfluum and surpluses of meaning as examples of redundancy of the text of lawAuthors: Maciej Kłodawski
  4. Pewność prawa a zasada interpretatio retro non agitAuthors: Agnieszka Bielska-Brodziak; Marek Suska
  5. Hans Kelsen as Outliner: The Defence of a Radical Norm TheoryAuthors: Stanley L. Paulson
  6. Cztery zagadki o rządach prawa:Dlaczego? Co? Gdzie? I kogo to obchodzi? Część IIAuthors: Martin Krygier
  7. Kant, Korsgaard i podmiotowość moralna zwierzątAuthors: Tomasz Pietrzykowski
  8. Robert Alexy’s Theory of Legal PrinciplesAuthors: Milena Korycka
  9. Why Legal Conventionalism FailsAuthors: Adam Dyrda
  10. Paweł Włodkowic i jego zapomniana koncepcja wojny sprawiedliwejAuthors: Tomasz Tulejski

Based on Google Search Console data.

Szukaj

Categories

  • Articles
  • Bez kategorii
  • Editorial
  • In Memoriam
  • News
  • Reports
  • Reviews and discussions
Journal infrastructureISSN 2082-3304Open accessCC BY 4.0Crossref DOIDOAJ

Copyright © 2026 Polska Sekcja Międzynarodowego Stowarzyszenia Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Społecznej IVR | Administrator strony: Karolina Gmerek

Ta strona używa plików cookies. Zakładamy, że wyrażają Państwo na to zgodę, ale mogą Państwo także wyłączyć pliki cookies w Ustawieniach. //
This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. (Zob. więcej // Read more) Ustawienia // SettingsZGODA // ACCEPT

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT