Research article

Some Remarks on Contractarian Justification of the Principles of Justice by John Rawls

Article authors
  1. Paweł Polaczuk

Kilka uwag o kontraktowym uzasadnieniu zasad sprawiedliwości Johna Rawlsa

Archiwum Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Społecznej, nr 1(2)/2011, s. 46-54

English

Abstract

This paper addresses the issue of whether the justification concerning the principles of justice adopted by Rawls allows for modifying morally significant differentiations found in the basic social structure. The idea of basic social structure as understood by Rawls is explained, and the requirements for justification assumed by Rawls are characterized. Theses requirements are determined by intuitive beliefs concerning justice; whereas such beliefs stipulate certain factors as being morally significant. The analysis of Rawls’s argument indicates that his justification with respect to the principles of justice is based on the criterion of benefit. This leads to privileging these conditions which according to the intuitive beliefs concerning justice should not be privileged. The original position of social groups, however, is not included within the framework of the justification mechanism, and so it requires revaluation for the same reasons as the previously mentioned issue.

Keywords

  • John Rawls
  • theory of justice
  • basic social structure
  • requirements for justification (keywords supplied by the editors)
Full text PDF How to cite

References

8 reference entries

References

  1. Forst, R. (1994). Kontexte der Gerechtigkeit. Politische Philosophie jenseits von Liberalismus und Kommunitarismus. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

  2. Koller, P. (2003). Praktische Rationalität und empirisches Wissen in der ethisch -politischen Theoriebildung. In R. Geiger, J. -Ch. Merle, N. Scarano (Eds.), Modelle politischer Philosophie (pp. 163-178). Padeborn: Mentis.

  3. Meyer, L. (1996). John Rawls und die Kommunitaristen. Eine Einführung In Rawls’ Theorie der Gerechtigkeit und die kommunitaristi sche Kritik am Liberalismus. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann.

  4. Pogge, T. (2003). Hypothetische Gesellschaftsveträge: Drei Schwierigkeiten. In R. Geiger, J.-Ch. Merle, N. Scarano (Eds.), Modelle politischer Philosophie (pp. 117-137). Padeborn: Mentis.

  5. Polaczuk, P. (2012). Theorie der Gerechtigkeit von John Rawls. Grundriss der Kritik. Archiv für Rechts – und Sozialphilosophie-Beiheft 128, 121-132.

  6. Polaczuk, P. (2010). Sytuacja początkowa. In B. Kruszewska, P. Polaczuk & L. Świto (Eds.), Sprawiedliwość. Wybr ane koncepcje (pp. 87 –104). Olsztyn: Wydział Prawa i Administracji

  7. Polaczuk, P. (2010). O podstawowych problemach z umownym uzasadnianiem zasad sprawiedliwości w Teorii sprawiedliwości Johna Rawlsa. In B. Kruszewska, P. Polaczuk & L. Świto (Eds.), Sprawiedliwość. Wybrane koncepcje (pp. 105 –133). Olsztyn: Wydział Prawa i Administracji

  8. Rawls J. (2009), Teoria sprawiedliwości. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.

Publication information

Author and affiliation

Paweł Polaczuk

Uniwersytet Warmińsko-Mazurski w Olsztynie

Issue data

Issue nr 1(2)/2011

Pages
46-54
Published
AccessOtwarty LicenceCC BY 4.0 ↗

How to cite

Bibliographic description and verified export formats.

Format AFPiFS

P. Polaczuk, Some Remarks on Contractarian Justification of the Principles of Justice by John Rawls, „Archiwum Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Społecznej” nr 1(2)/2011, s. 46–54, DOI: 10.36280/afpifs.2011.1.46