Research article

Does every culture deserves a defence? Few queries concerning cultural defence and criminal law in the age of multiculturalism

Article authors
  1. Michał Dudek

Czy każda kultura zasługuje na obronę? Kilka wątpliwości dotyczących cultural defence i prawa karnego w dobie multikulturalizmu

Archiwum Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Społecznej, nr 2(3)/2011, s. 47-60

English

Abstract

The aim of the article is to indicate some of the axiological problems faced by the legislator in the law-making process. They are clearly visible in those legal regulations that are introduced in response to crisis situations. The presented example – terrorist attack by hijacking a plane – is not only used to demonstrate dilemmas which in this situation must be settled by the legislator preparing relevant legal provisions, but it is also a pretext for enriching the discussion on the axiological aspect of the law. The article focuses on the so-called natural helplessness of law in axiological matters, law inflation and the problem of responsibility. The author concludes that issues indicated in the article cannot be solved in the light of current Constitutional Court’s judgements, which are treated as a reference point of the discussed issues.

Keywords

  • cultural defence
  • multiculturalism
  • ethnocentrism
  • militant ethnocentrism
  • criminal law
  • minority rights
Full text PDF How to cite

References

The source publication has no distinct reference list. Its citations are contained in the footnotes of the full-text PDF.

Open references in PDF — PDF

Publication information

Author and affiliation

Michał Dudek

Uniwersytet Jagielloński

Issue data

Issue nr 2(3)/2011

Pages
47-60
Published
AccessOtwarty LicenceCC BY 4.0 ↗

How to cite

Bibliographic description and verified export formats.

Format AFPiFS

M. Dudek, Does every culture deserves a defence? Few queries concerning cultural defence and criminal law in the age of multiculturalism, „Archiwum Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Społecznej” nr 2(3)/2011, s. 47–60, DOI: 10.36280/afpifs.2011.2.47