Research article
Some remarks about the application of the cognitive linguistics’ tools for the differentiation between extensive interpretation and analogy
Kilka uwag o przydatności narzędzi lingwistyki kognitywnej do rozróżnienia wykładni rozszerzającej i wnioskowania przez analogię
Archiwum Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Społecznej, nr 1(14)/2017, s. 125-140
English
Abstract
The paper is the proposal of the discussion upon the utility of the cognitive linguistics’ tools for legal application, especially within the field of legal interpretation and legal reasoning. Cognitive linguistics is the school of linguistics and cognitive science, developing from 1970s of the XX century, researching on language and mind and their intersection. The analysis of the instances originating in the Polish law in force, made by the means of different concepts of cognitive linguistics (prototypes, radial categories, idealized cognitive models, conceptual metaphors) is here the basis to formulate some postulates concerning the way of understanding and differentiation between extensive interpretation and analogy. The instances and postulates simultaneously let one distinguish those linguistic changes, which inevitably occur in time, and which should be recognised as the domain of linguistic interpretation.
Keywords
- cognitive linguistics
- interpretation
- extensive interpretation
- legal reasoning
- analogy
References
15 reference entries
References
-
Elżanowski, A., Pietrzykowski, T. (2013). Zwierzęta jako nieosobowe podmioty prawa. Forum Prawnicze 1, 18-27.
-
Evans, V. (2009). Leksykon językoznawstwa kognitywnego. Kraków: Universitas.
-
Goettel, M. (2013). Sytuacja zwierzęcia w prawie cywilnym. Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer.
-
Lakoff, G., Johnson, M. (1988). Metafory w naszym życiu. Warszawa: Państwowy Instytut Wydawniczy.
-
Larsson, S. (2011). Metaphors and Norms. Understanding copyright law in a digital society. Lund: Lund University.
-
Nowacki, J. (1966). Analogia legis. Warszawa: PWN.
-
Pasieka, P. (2012). Kartezjańska koncepcja zwierzęcia – maszyny. Filo-Sofija 17, 51-64.
-
Peczenik, A. (1971). Analogia legis, analogy from statutes in continental law. Logique & Analyse 53- 54, 329-336.
-
Płeszka, K. (2010). Wykładnia rozszerzająca. Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer.
-
Ross, A. (2004). On Law and Justice. Clark, NJ: The Lawbook Exchange.
-
Spyra, T. (2006). Granice wykładni prawa. Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer.
-
Świderek, J. (2006). Starożytne koncepcje racjonalizmu a zagadnienie rozumności zwierząt. Wschodni rocznik humanistyczny 3, 225-245.
-
Szymczak M. (Ed.). (1999). Słownik języka polskiego PWN. Warszawa: PWN.
-
Wojtczak S. (2013). The Broadening of Legal Notions as a Tool in the Neutralization of Values in Law. In: K. Pałecki (red.), Neutralization of values in law (pp. 116-133). Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer.
-
Wróblewski, J. (1959). Zagadnienia teorii wykładni prawa ludowego. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Prawnicze.
Publication information
Issue data
Issue nr 1(14)/2017
- Pages
- 125-140
- Published
How to cite
Bibliographic description and verified export formats.
Format AFPiFS
S. Wojtczak, Some remarks about the application of the cognitive linguistics’ tools for the differentiation between extensive interpretation and analogy, „Archiwum Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Społecznej” nr 1(14)/2017, s. 125–140, DOI: 10.36280/afpifs.2017.1.125
ACM
[1] Sylwia Wojtczak. 2017. Some remarks about the application of the cognitive linguistics’ tools for the differentiation between extensive interpretation and analogy. AFPiFS 1(14) (2017), 125–140. https://doi.org/10.36280/afpifs.2017.1.125
ACS
(1) Wojtczak, S. Some Remarks about the Application of the Cognitive Linguistics’ Tools for the Differentiation between Extensive Interpretation and Analogy. AFPiFS 2017, No. 1(14), 125–140. https://doi.org/10.36280/afpifs.2017.1.125.
APA
Wojtczak, S. (2017). Some remarks about the application of the cognitive linguistics’ tools for the differentiation between extensive interpretation and analogy. Archiwum Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Społecznej, 1(14), 125–140. https://doi.org/10.36280/afpifs.2017.1.125
ABNT
WOJTCZAK, Sylwia. Some remarks about the application of the cognitive linguistics’ tools for the differentiation between extensive interpretation and analogy. Archiwum Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Społecznej, n. 1(14), p. 125–140, 2017.
Chicago
Wojtczak, Sylwia. “Some Remarks about the Application of the Cognitive Linguistics’ Tools for the Differentiation between Extensive Interpretation and Analogy.” Archiwum Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Społecznej, no. 1(14) (2017): 125–40. https://doi.org/10.36280/afpifs.2017.1.125.
Harvard
Wojtczak, S. (2017) “Some remarks about the application of the cognitive linguistics’ tools for the differentiation between extensive interpretation and analogy,” Archiwum Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Społecznej, 1(14), pp. 125–140. Available at: https://doi.org/10.36280/afpifs.2017.1.125.
IEEE
[1] S. Wojtczak, “Some remarks about the application of the cognitive linguistics’ tools for the differentiation between extensive interpretation and analogy,” AFPiFS, no. 1(14), pp. 125–140, 2017, doi: 10.36280/afpifs.2017.1.125.
MLA
Wojtczak, Sylwia. “Some Remarks about the Application of the Cognitive Linguistics’ Tools for the Differentiation between Extensive Interpretation and Analogy.” Archiwum Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Społecznej, no. 1(14), 2017, pp. 125–40, https://doi.org/10.36280/afpifs.2017.1.125.
Turabian
Wojtczak, Sylwia. “Some Remarks about the Application of the Cognitive Linguistics’ Tools for the Differentiation between Extensive Interpretation and Analogy.” Archiwum Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Społecznej, no. 1(14) (2017): 125–40. https://doi.org/10.36280/afpifs.2017.1.125.
Vancouver
1. Wojtczak S. Some remarks about the application of the cognitive linguistics’ tools for the differentiation between extensive interpretation and analogy. AFPiFS. 2017;1(14):125–40. doi:10.36280/afpifs.2017.1.125
OSCOLA
Sylwia Wojtczak, ‘Some remarks about the application of the cognitive linguistics’ tools for the differentiation between extensive interpretation and analogy’ (2017) 1(14) AFPiFS 125 <https://doi.org/10.36280/afpifs.2017.1.125>.