Artykuł naukowy
A few rare remarks on legal gaps
O lukach w prawie rzadko spotykanych słów kilka
Archiwum Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Społecznej, nr 1(6)/2013, s. 109-122
Polish
Translated abstract
The article addresses the issue of legal gaps (lacunas). Specifically, the author puts forward the general definition of legal gap which uses the concept of ‘automatically applicable’ legal rule as well as presupposes specific understanding of law – namely, that it is consisted solely of the rules of the mentioned type. Next, basing upon that definition, he defines three kinds of lacunas that are commonly distinguished in Polish and international scholarly literature, i.e. extra, intra and contra legem. As it is demonstrated, the merits of proffered definitions are manifold. First of all, they reduce the dependence of the notion of legal gap on value judgment. Secondly, they fairly well fit into the structure of contemporary legal orders. Thirdly, owing to them, the filling of legal gaps is not pointless. And lastly, the other kinds of lacunas one may encounter in academic literature are not at odds with the proffered theory, at least not by definition. At the end of the article, in the light of the main idea of the author’s conception, the Anglo -Saxon notion of the case of first impression is discussed, taking into account different models of (approaches to) the phenomenon of a binding judicial precedent.
Translated keywords
- luka w prawie
- luka extra legem
- luka intra legem
- luka contra legem
English
Abstract
The article addresses the issue of legal gaps (lacunas). Specifically, the author puts forward the general definition of legal gap which uses the concept of ‘automatically applicable’ legal rule as well as presupposes specific understanding of law – namely, that it is consisted solely of the rules of the mentioned type. Next, basing upon that definition, he defines three kinds of lacunas that are commonly distinguished in Polish and international scholarly literature, i.e. extra , intra and contra legem . As it is demonstrated, the merits of proffered definitions are manifold. First of all, they reduce the dependence of the notion of legal gap on value judgment. Secondly, they fairly well fit into the structure of contemporary legal orders. Thirdly, owing to them, the filling of legal gaps is not pointless. And lastly, the other kinds of lacunas one may encounter in academic literature are not at odds with the proffered theory, at least not by definition. At the end of the article, in the light of the main idea of the author’s conception, the Anglo -Saxon notion of the case of first impression is discussed, taking into account different models of (approaches to) the phenomenon of a binding judicial precedent.
Keywords
- legal gap
- extra legem gap
- intra legem gap
- contra legem gap
References
22 reference entries
References
-
Alexander, L., Sherwin, E. (2008). Demystifying Legal Reasoning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
-
Bankowski, Z., MacCormick, D.N., Marshall, G. (1997). Precedent in the United Kingdom. In D.N. MacCormick, R.S. Summers ( Eds.), Interpreting Statutes. A Comparative Study. Dartmouth: Dartmouth Applied Legal Philosophy Series.
-
Chauvin, T.,Stawecki, T., Winczorek, P. (2012). Wstęp do prawoznawstwa. Warszawa: C.H. Beck.
-
Jamróz, A. (2011). Wprowadzenie do prawoznawstwa. Warszawa: LexisNexis Polska.
-
Koszowski, M. (2009). Anglosaska doktryna precedensu. Porównanie z polską praktyką orzeczniczą. Warszawa: Warszawska Firma Wydawnicza.
-
MacCormick, D.N. (1978). Legal Reasoning and Legal Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
-
MacCormick, D.N. (2005). Rhetoric and the Rule of Law. A Theory of Legal Reasoning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
-
Mastalski, R. (2008). Stosowanie prawa podatkowego. Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer Polska.
-
Morawski, L. (2011). Wstęp do pr awoznawstwa. Toruń: Towarzystwo Naukowe Organizacji i Kierownictwa Dom Organizatora.
-
Morawski, L. (2002). Wykładnia w orzecznictwie sądów. Komentarz. Toruń: Towarzystwo Naukowe Organizacji i Kierownictwa Dom Organizatora.
-
Morawski, L. (2006). Zasady wykładni prawa. Toruń: Towarzystwo Naukowe Organizacji i Kierownictwa Dom Organizatora.
-
Municzewski, A. (2004). Reguły interpretacyjne w działalności orzeczniczej Sądu Najwyższego. Szczecin: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego.
-
Nowacki, J. (2003). Studia z teorii prawa. Kraków: Kantor Wydawniczy Zakamycze.
-
Opałek, K., Wróblewski, J. (1969). Zagadnienia teorii prawa. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.
-
Peczenik, A. (2008). On Law and Reason. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
-
Pulka, Z. (2008). Podstawy prawa. Podstawowe pojęcia prawa i prawoznawstwa. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Forum Naukowe.
-
Raz, J. (1979). The Authority of Law. Essays on Law and Morality. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
-
Redelbach, A., Wronkowska, S., Ziembiński, Z. (1992). Zarys teorii państwa i prawa. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
-
Smoktunowicz, E. (1970). Analogia w prawie administracyj nym. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.
-
Wróblewski, J. (1991). Statutory Interpretation in Poland. In D.N. MacCormick, R.S. Summers (Eds.), Interpreting Statutes. A Comparative Study. Dartmouth: Dartmouth Applied Legal Philosophy Series.
-
Wróblewski, J. (1992). The Judicial Application of Law. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
-
Ziembiński, Z. (1980). Problemy podstawowe prawoznawstwa. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.
Publication information
Issue data
Issue nr 1(6)/2013
- Pages
- 109-122
- Published
How to cite
Bibliographic description and verified export formats.
Format AFPiFS
M. Koszowski, A few rare remarks on legal gaps, „Archiwum Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Społecznej” nr 1(6)/2013, s. 109–122, DOI: 10.36280/afpifs.2013.1.109
ACM
[1] Maciej Koszowski. 2013. A few rare remarks on legal gaps. AFPiFS 1(6) (2013), 109–122. https://doi.org/10.36280/afpifs.2013.1.109
ACS
(1) Koszowski, M. A Few Rare Remarks on Legal Gaps. AFPiFS 2013, No. 1(6), 109–122. https://doi.org/10.36280/afpifs.2013.1.109.
APA
Koszowski, M. (2013). A few rare remarks on legal gaps. Archiwum Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Społecznej, 1(6), 109–122. https://doi.org/10.36280/afpifs.2013.1.109
ABNT
KOSZOWSKI, Maciej. A few rare remarks on legal gaps. Archiwum Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Społecznej, n. 1(6), p. 109–122, 2013.
Chicago
Koszowski, Maciej. “A Few Rare Remarks on Legal Gaps.” Archiwum Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Społecznej, no. 1(6) (2013): 109–22. https://doi.org/10.36280/afpifs.2013.1.109.
Harvard
Koszowski, M. (2013) “A few rare remarks on legal gaps,” Archiwum Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Społecznej, 1(6), pp. 109–122. Available at: https://doi.org/10.36280/afpifs.2013.1.109.
IEEE
[1] M. Koszowski, “A few rare remarks on legal gaps,” AFPiFS, no. 1(6), pp. 109–122, 2013, doi: 10.36280/afpifs.2013.1.109.
MLA
Koszowski, Maciej. “A Few Rare Remarks on Legal Gaps.” Archiwum Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Społecznej, no. 1(6), 2013, pp. 109–22, https://doi.org/10.36280/afpifs.2013.1.109.
Turabian
Koszowski, Maciej. “A Few Rare Remarks on Legal Gaps.” Archiwum Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Społecznej, no. 1(6) (2013): 109–22. https://doi.org/10.36280/afpifs.2013.1.109.
Vancouver
1. Koszowski M. A few rare remarks on legal gaps. AFPiFS. 2013;1(6):109–22. doi:10.36280/afpifs.2013.1.109
OSCOLA
Maciej Koszowski, ‘A few rare remarks on legal gaps’ (2013) 1(6) AFPiFS 109 <https://doi.org/10.36280/afpifs.2013.1.109>.