Archiwum Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Społecznej
Journal of the Polish Section of IVR (ISSN:2082-3304)
Language: polish
Published: Number 1(46)/2026, pp. 112–117.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36280/AFPiFS.2026.1.112
DownloadNumber of downloads: 109
This text is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Language: Polish
Published: Number 2(43)/2025, pp. 161-167.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36280/AFPiFS.2025.2.161
Download: Download
Number of downloads: 125
This text is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Language: Polish
Published: Number 2(43)/2025, pp. 154-160.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36280/AFPiFS.2025.2.154
Download: Download
Number of downloads: 115
This text is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Keywords: Identity, philosophical narrativism, legal personhood, philosophy of law, minority rights, LGBTQ+ rights.
Language: Polish.
Published: No. 1(42)/2025, pp. 112-118.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36280/AFPiFS.2025.1.112
Download: Download
Number of downloads: 185
This text is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Keywords: review, Emmanuel Jeuland, Marzena Kordela.
Language: English
Published: 2(39)/2024, pp. 101-108.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36280/AFPiFS.2024.2.101
Download: Download
Number of downloads: 171
This text is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Language: polski
Published: Number 1(34)/2023, pp. 102-107
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36280//AFPiFS.2023.1.102
Download: Download
Number of downloads: 322
This text is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial – No Derivative Works 4.0 International License.
Keywords: law, aesthetics, aesthetics of law, philosophy of law, axiology, jursiprudence
Language: English
Published: Number 3(32)/2022, pp. 114-118
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36280/AFPiFS.2022.3.114
Download: Download
Number of downloads: 357
This text is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial – No Derivative Works 4.0 International License.
English abstract: Against Beata Polanowksa-Sygulska (BP-S), I insist on the incompatibility between the pluralism of comprehensive world-views and belief in the monist, universalist tenets of the principal world religions, noting that God the Father and God the Son were both monists. I argue that my position is entailed by Isaiah Berlin’s rejection of the unique truth of any one comprehensive outlook, and that both Berlin and BP-S confuse toleration with acceptance. I reject the charges that my position is monistic, and that I give insufficient attention to conflict within individual values, which can in any case be treated as conflict between values.
Keywords: God, monism, pluralism, religion, Isaiah Berlin
Language: English
Published: Number 3(24)/2020, pp. 130-132.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36280/AFPiFS.2020.3.130
Download: Download
Number of downloads: 496
English abstract: The article constitutes a continuation of the discussion between Henry Hardy and myself, which was initiated in AFPiFS in 2019 as a result of my publishing a review of Hardy’s book: In Search of Isaiah Berlin: A Literary Adventure (2018). In the present commentary I address again the nub of our disagreement, that is the relationship between Berlin’s pluralism and universalist religions, like Christianity and Islam. According to Hardy pluralism undermines universalist religions. I distance myself from his standpoint and argue that it is possible to reconcile adherence to pluralist perspective in ethics with religious belief. Besides, I return to the objection raised in my review of Hardy’s book and take up the thread of conflicts within values. I sustain my charge that Hardy does not take seriously enough the implications of conflicts within single values.
Keywords: value pluralism, universalist religions, religious pluralism, conflicts within values
Language: English
Published: Number 3(24)/2020, pp. 127-129.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36280/AFPiFS.2020.3.127
Download: Download
Number of downloads: 605
English abstract: The subject of the review is a monograph by Karol Dobrzeniecki “Law on emergency situations. Between legalism and necessity” (Toruń 2018). According to the reviewer, the nature of the work determines the distinction between an emergency situation, that is, a factual state requiring action not provided for by law and a state of emergency, i.e. a legal institution. The main purpose of the work is to analyze the relationship between the recognition of an exceptional situation only in legal terms, and its approach as a political and moral issue. The work has interdisciplinary character. Karol Dobrzeniecki, analyzing jurisprudence, political philosophical, doctrine of constitutional law, as well as constitutional, international and supranational legal regulations, points out the danger of legal “normalization” of a state of emergency, that is, the penetration of its specific solutions into the law intended for the ordinary situation, and hence blurring of the distinction between ordinary and exceptional situations. The author of the reviewed monograph believes that the exceptional situation should be assessed primarily in moral and political categories, being aware of the tragic nature of the choices made at the time.
Keywords: emergency situation, state of emergency
Language: Polish
Published: Number 1(22)/2020, pp. 121-125.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36280/AFPiFS.2020.1.121
Download: Download
Number of downloads: 626