Research article

The justification system of John Rawls’s theory of justice

Article authors
  1. Wojciech Ciszewski

System uzasadnienia teorii sprawiedliwości Johna Rawlsa

Archiwum Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Społecznej, nr 1(6)/2013, s. 34-53

English

Abstract

The paper considers a fundamental issue set against the backcloth of John Rawls’s theory of justice, namely the structure of its justification system. The issue is so significant, because justification fulfills a key role in the Rawlsian conception. J. Rawls offers a sophisticated system consisting of different arguments aimed at reaching full justification. In the author’s opinion, there are five elements that relate to each other: 1) original position with the idea of the veil of ignorance, 2) reflective equilibrium, 3) public reason, 4) overlapping consensus, and 5) fundamental constructivist ideas. The five above mentioned arguments seem to be based on four different argumentative strategies: 1) a coherentist strategy – referring to the general and internal coherence of the system; 2) a contractualist strategy – based on the notion of social contract; 3) a pragmatic strategy – referring to the connection with effective social practices; and 4) a constructivist strategy which is founded in the particular view of reasonableness. The justification system evolves from A Theory of Justice to Political Liberalism. However, though the system develops, it is always aimed at the same goal – to gather our considered beliefs and facts about a modern society into a coherent set of judgments which may claim to be valid.

Keywords

  • John Rawls
  • justice as fairness
  • veil of ignorance
  • original position
Full text PDF How to cite

References

26 reference entries

References

  1. Barry, B.M. (1989). Theories of Justice. Berkeley: University of California Press.

  2. Chisholm, R.M. (1994). Teoria poznania. Lublin: Daimonion.

  3. Daniels, N. (1996 ). Justice and Justification. Reflective Equilibrium in Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  4. Freeman, S. (2006). Justice and the Social Contract. New York: Oxford University Press.

  5. Freeman, S. (2007). Rawls. New York: Routledge.

  6. Galewicz, W. (2007). Studia z etyki przekonań. Kraków: Towarzystwo Autorów i Wydawców Prac Naukowych Universitas.

  7. Habermas, J. (2009). Uwzględniając Innego. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.

  8. Hart, H.L.A. (2001). Eseje z filozofii prawa. Warszawa: Dom Wydawniczy ABC.

  9. Kant, I. (2005). Rozprawy z filozofii historii. Kęty: Wydawnictwo Antyk.

  10. Larmore, C. (2003). Public Reason. In S. Freeman ( Ed.), Cambridge Companion to Rawls. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  11. Nowakowski, A. (2011). Uzasadnienie epistemiczne. Lublin: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej.

  12. O’Neill, O. (2003a). Constructivism in Rawls and Kant. In S. Freeman (Ed.), Cambridge Companion to Rawls. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  13. O’Neill, O. (2003b). Costructivism vs. Contractualism. Ratio. An International Journal of Analytic Philosophy 16/4, 319–331.

  14. Pogge, T. (2007). John Rawls. His Life and Theory of Justice. New York: Oxford University Press.

  15. Porębski, C. (2004). Umowa społeczna. In B. Szlachta ( Ed.), Słownik społeczny. Kraków: Wydawnictwo WAM.

  16. Rawls, J. (2001). Justice as Fairness: a Restatement. Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard University Press.

  17. Rawls, J. (1999a). Kantian Constructivism in Moral Theory. In J. Rawls, S. Freeman (Eds.), Collected Papers. Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard University Press.

  18. Rawls, J. (1998). Liberalizm polityczny. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.

  19. Rawls, J. (1999b). Outline of a Decision Procedure for Ethics. In J. Rawls, S. Freeman ( Eds.), Collected Papers. Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard University Press.

  20. Rawls, J. (2001). Prawo Ludów. Warszawa: Fundacja Aletheia.

  21. Rawls, J. (2009). Teoria sprawiedliwości. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.

  22. Rawls, J. (1999 c). The Idea of Overlapping Consensu s. In J. Rawls, S. Freeman ( Eds.), Collected Papers. Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard University Press.

  23. Rawls, J. (1999 d). Themes in Kants Moral Philosophy. In J. Rawls, S. Freeman ( Eds.), Collected Papers. Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard University Press.

  24. Rorty, R. (1999). Obiektywność, relatywizm i prawda. Warszawa: Fundacja Aletheia.

  25. Sandel, M. (2009). Liberalizm a granice sprawiedliwości. Warszawa: Wydawnictwa Akademickie i Profesjonalne.

  26. Scanlon, T.M. (2003). Rawls on Justification. In S. Freeman (Ed.), Cambridge Companion to Rawls. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Publication information

Author and affiliation

Wojciech Ciszewski

Uniwersytet Jagielloński

Issue data

Issue nr 1(6)/2013

Pages
34-53
Published
AccessOtwarty LicenceCC BY 4.0 ↗

How to cite

Bibliographic description and verified export formats.

Format AFPiFS

W. Ciszewski, The justification system of John Rawls’s theory of justice, „Archiwum Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Społecznej” nr 1(6)/2013, s. 34–53, DOI: 10.36280/afpifs.2013.1.34