Archiwum Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Społecznej

Journal of the Polish Section of IVR (ISSN:2082-3304)

IVRwww.ivr.org.pl
  • About us
  • Aim & scope
  • News
  • Issues
    • Current issue
    • Past Issues
    • Thematic Collections
  • Editorial board
    • Board Members
    • Reviewers
  • For authors
  • Ethics
  • Contact
  • Polski

Search Results for: private property

Private Property and Its Social Dimension in the Views of Rudolf von Jhering and Otto von Gierke

Dr Paweł LESIŃSKI

Maria Curie-Skłodowska University in Lublin

English abstract: The article is an attempt to analyse the views of Rudolf von Jhering and Otto von Gierke views on the question of social dimension of private property. These two German lawyers formulated their ideas during the period of search for the solutions to socio-economic problems regarding private property and its scope. They both represented essentially identical views on the importance of private property in the context of its existence in the community. In order to fulfill the research task described above, the article firstly analyses the historical and ideological background for solutions to the problems of private property in Germany in 19th century. Secondly, the article examines the question of the individual’s position within the community in the thought of Jhering and Gierke. The third part of the article analyses the views of these scholars on the essence of the legal order in the context of private property. The last part of the article refers to their views on private property perceived as a  phenomenon which by definition includes limitations and results in both rights and obligations for the owner.

Keywords:  private property, Rudolf von Jhering, Otto von Gierke, community, social obligation

Language: Polish

Published: Number 1(34)/2023, pp.46-57

DOI: https://doi.org/10.36280//AFPiFS.2023.1.46

Download: Download
Number of downloads: 406

This text is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial – No Derivative Works 4.0 International License.

Filed Under: Articles Tagged With: community, Otto von Gierke, private property, Rudolf von Jhering, social obligation

Bruce Lee’s Case: Intellectual Property vs. Free Access to Culture and Protection of Public Interest

Dr Magdalena Łągiewska, prof. dr hab. Kamil Zeidler

University of Gdańsk

English abstract: This article provides a comprehensive analysis of Bruce Lee’s case by presenting the intellectual property rights mechanisms in the People’s Republic of China. The aim of this paper is to bring attention to the trademark law as well as to shed new light on infringements of personality rights, in particular portrait rights, in trademarks. This begs the question as to what kind of legal action should be undertaken by Bruce Lee’s heiress to protect her rights. Moreover, the article touches upon the conflict between the public interest and trademarks and tries to answer the question how to balance private holders’ rights with the public interest. In order to provide some hypothetical scenarios, the study focuses primarily on Bruce Lee’s case background and the new amendments to trademark law in China, bringing the authors to final deliberations on Bruce Lee as part of modern culture belonging to mankind as a whole. Therefore, our research aims to find a solution to the challenging problem of reconciling intellectual property rights protection mechanisms with the common cultural heritage.

Keywords: Bruce Lee’s case, intellectual property infringement, trademark law, Chinese law, public interest, cultural heritage

Language: English

Published: Number 3(24)/2020, pp. 79-92.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.36280/AFPiFS.2020.3.79

Download: Download
Number of downloads: 679

Filed Under: Articles Tagged With: Bruce Lee’s case, Chinese law, cultural heritage, intellectual property infringement, public interest, trademark law

Libertarianism, Jusnaturalist Skepticism, and the Argument from the Legitimate Use of Force

prof. UMK dr hab. Łukasz Dominiak

Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń

English abstract: The article analyses the argument from the justified use of force, put forward against jusnaturalist skepticism by Stephan Kinsella. This argument is intended to show that skepticism about natural rights has become entangled in a performative contradiction, because in order to prove that no natural rights exist, it must assume the existence of such rights. The defeat of jusnaturalist skepticism, in turn, is to prove apagogically the existence of natural rights, including the libertarian private property rights. The article shows, using Hohfeld’s analysis method, that the anti-skeptical argument from the justified use of force does not achieve its goals.

Keywords: libertarianism, jusnaturalism, skepticism, natural rights, Hohfeld, Kinsella

Language: Polish

Published: nr 3(40)/2024, pp. 5-15.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.36280/AFPiFS.2024.3.5

Download: Download

Number of downloads: 249

This text is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Filed Under: Articles

Issue 1(34)/2023 „Archiwum…” is available

We invite you to read the latest issue of „Archiwum Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Społecznej”. The issue includes the following texts: 

  • Prof. UMK dr hab. Marta BARANOWSKA: Liberty – Equality – Fraternity, or Rudolf Steiner’s Concept of Threefold Society
  • Mgr Bartosz BISKUP: Open texture of law and evolution of legal institutions. The case of marriage
  • Dr Karolina GMEREK: ‘Tacit’ Declarations of Intent: Considerations in the Context of the Normative Concept of Omission
  • Dr Paweł LESIŃSKI: Private Property and Its Social Dimension in the Views of Rudolf von Jhering and Otto von Gierke
  • Dr Marek SUSKA: Terminological Consistency in the Legal System. A View at the Problem of Interpretation from the Perspective of Law-making Practice
  • Mgr Jan TURLEJ: Contemporary Debate on John Rawls’s Political Concept of Human Rights. Selected Arguments and Positions
  • Dr Mariola ŻAK: Institutional Critique as a Research Perspective of Jurisprudence in the Context of Jacques Rancière’s Philosophy
  • Prof. KUL dr hab. Jadwiga POTRZESZCZ: Magdalena Najda, Aleksandra Rutkowska, Dariusz Rutkowski, Courtroom Psychology. How communication and emotions affect on the perception of justice, Bielsko-Biala 2021. A Review

The issue is available HERE.

Filed Under: News

Number 1(34)/2023 [POL]

Articles:

Prof. UMK dr hab. Marta BARANOWSKA
Liberty – Equality – Fraternity, or Rudolf Steiner’s Concept of Threefold Society

Mgr Bartosz BISKUP
Open texture of law and evolution of legal institutions. The case of marriage

Dr Karolina GMEREK
‘Tacit’ Declarations of Intent: Considerations in the Context of the Normative Concept of Omission

Dr Paweł LESIŃSKI
Private Property and Its Social Dimension in the Views of Rudolf von Jhering and Otto von Gierke

Dr Marek SUSKA
Terminological Consistency in the Legal System. A View at the Problem of Interpretation from the Perspective of Law-making Practice

Mgr Jan TURLEJ
Contemporary Debate on John Rawls’s Political Concept of Human Rights. Selected Arguments and Positions

Dr Mariola ŻAK
Institutional Critique as a Research Perspective of Jurisprudence in the Context of Jacques Rancière’s Philosophy

Reviews and discussions:

Prof. KUL dr hab. Jadwiga POTRZESZCZ
Magdalena Najda, Aleksandra Rutkowska, Dariusz Rutkowski, Courtroom Psychology. How communication and emotions affect on the perception of justice, Bielsko-Biala 2021. A Review

Szukaj

Categories

  • Articles
  • Bez kategorii
  • Editorial
  • In Memoriam
  • News
  • Reports
  • Reviews and discussions
Journal infrastructureISSN 2082-3304Open accessCC BY 4.0Crossref DOIDOAJ

Copyright © 2026 Polska Sekcja Międzynarodowego Stowarzyszenia Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Społecznej IVR | Administrator strony: Karolina Gmerek

Ta strona używa plików cookies. Zakładamy, że wyrażają Państwo na to zgodę, ale mogą Państwo także wyłączyć pliki cookies w Ustawieniach. //
This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. (Zob. więcej // Read more) Ustawienia // SettingsZGODA // ACCEPT

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT