Archiwum Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Społecznej

Journal of the Polish Section of IVR (ISSN:2082-3304)

IVRwww.ivr.org.pl

Search Results for: jurisprudence

Criminalization of communist propaganda in the jurisprudence of the Supreme Court of the Second Republic of Poland

Mgr Kamil Słomiński

University of Warsaw

English abstract: Combating totalitarian propaganda is a topic that continues to challenge the law, including criminal law dogmatics. The criminalization of totalitarian propaganda plays a special role in countries which have been affected by these regimes. Polish law currently criminalizes the propagation of communist ideology. It is worth presenting how this concept was shaped against the historical background of the regulations in force in the Second Republic of Poland. The article addresses the issue of criminalization of communist propaganda in the Second Republic of Poland. It analyses the rulings of the Supreme Court and scholars’ views concerning this issue from the period 1918–1939.

Keywords: criminalization, communism, propaganda, jurisprudence, Supreme Court

Language: English

Published: Number 3(44)/2025, pp. 107-118.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.36280/AFPiFS.2025.3.107

Download: Download

Number of downloads: 172

This text is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Gustav Klimt’s Jurisprudence and the Problem of the Scale of Claims on the Law

Natalia Regina Skoczylas

University of Wrocław

Dr Mateusz Wojtanowski

University of Wrocław

Abstrakt w języku polskim: The subject of this article is Gustav Klimt’s Jurisprudenz, a work intended as part of a larger exhibition of paintings depicting specific fields of knowledge. In contrast to the prevailing interpretation of the work in question as an expression of the artist’s personal sense of having been wronged, the authors of this article propose an alternative perspective, suggesting that the image carries a valuable message for legal discourse. As they argue, the image in question makes it possible to identify a potential way of improving the practice of law by reducing claims on it. In terms of the axiological perspective of the considerations, the article is located within the liberal democratic tradition. The article has an interdisciplinary character as Jurisprudence is interpreted from the perspective of art history and legal philosophy.

Słowa kluczowe: Gustav Klimt, Jurisprudenz, art history, philosophy of law, claims to law, aesthetics of law

Język artykułu: polski

Opublikowano: Numer 2(43)/2025, s. 58-79.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.36280/AFPiFS.2025.2.58

Ściągnij plik: Download

Liczba ściągnięć: 241

Tekst jest dostępny na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa 4.0 Międzynarodowe.

Bartosz Wojciechowski, Tożsamość narracyjna jako warunek autentycznej podmiotowości prawnej [Narrative Identity as a Condition for True Legal Subjectivity], series: Jurysprudencja [Jurisprudence], t. 21, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, Łódź 2023, pp. 180

Dr Joanna M. Dutka

Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań

Keywords: Identity, philosophical narrativism, legal personhood, philosophy of law, minority rights, LGBTQ+ rights.

Language: Polish.

Published: No. 1(42)/2025, pp. 112-118.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.36280/AFPiFS.2025.1.112

Download: Download

Number of downloads: 268

This text is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Political Agonism and Thinking About Law and Jurisprudence

prof. UŁ dr hab. Jerzy Leszczyński

Lodz University

English abstract: The article contains a polemic with the thesis that populism and the unveiling of the hitherto hidden political nature of law have resulted in a crisis of legal discourses. In addition, it argues against recognizing democratic/liberal hegemony as the main cause of these phenomena. Criticism of democratic liberalism from a political point of view provides little basis for announcing that jurisprudence has lost its credibility and its reconstruction should mean the overt politicization of legal discourses. Such a position is not an element of Ch. Mouffe’s agonistic theory. On the contrary, the project of agonistic democracy assumes maintaining legal democratic institutions that require political neutrality. The rule of law and the law meeting the requirements of the normative idea of law should be considered as political demands. Only then can law as normativity be contrasted with the factuality of law as the sovereign’s decision. This duality is visible in the concept of the state of emergency (C. Schmitt). To a large extent, the article is a polemic with the works of A. Sulikowski.

Keywords: agonism, Mouffe, politicalness, law, rule of law, Sulikowski

Language: Polish

Published: nr 3(40)/2024, pp. 41-53.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.36280/AFPiFS.2024.3.41

Download: Download

Number of downloads: 250

This text is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

An Ideal of Scientific Jurisprudence. Józef Nowacki Against Ideological Influences on Jurisprudential Claims

Prof. dr hab. Tomasz PIETRZYKOWSKI

University of Silesia in Katowice

English abstract: Methodological assumptions underpinning Józef Nowacki’s research were one of the most original and intriguing aspects of his approach to legal theory. An extremely rigorous conception of what kind of legal claims may be regarded as scientific can be reconstructed based on his various writings about legal norms, general clauses, dispositive provisions of law, legal principles or the practical application of the constitutional notion of the rule of law. His relentless efforts to uncover and eliminate from scientific discourse any evaluative judgments served to defend legal theory against ideological influences and subjective wishful thinking disguised as scientific claims. In these respects, it not only was an unquestionably valuable position then, but it remains so nowadays. At the same time, it begs numerous questions and doubts that still permeate central methodological debates in jurisprudence.

Keywords: law, methodology, valuing, legal theory, science

Language: Polish

Published: Number 3(36)/2023, s. 22-33.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.36280/AFPiFS.2023.3.22

Download: Download
Number of downloads: 373

This text is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial – No Derivative Works 4.0 International License.

Should Judges Be Empathic? The Place of Judges’ Empathy in Therapeutic Jurisprudence

Katarzyna Rużyczka

Jagiellonian University in Kraków, Poland

English abstract: Therapeutic jurisprudence (TJ) has had a influence on the judiciary and legal practice given the emergence of special courts, the so-called problem-solving courts. As understood by David B. Wexler, TJ is an approach that combines experience from many scientific fields, constituting an interdisciplinary field of research that focuses on the therapeutic and antitherapeutic consequences of laws, legal procedures, and the roles and behaviours of legal actors such as lawyers and judges. The role that they play during a trial is particularly emphasized
in this theory in the context of causing both positive and negative consequences for those participating in the trial. The first purpose of this paper is to reconstruct the understanding of empathy and its role in the therapeutic jurisprudence, and to show how the concept of empathy is understood in the context of a judge’s work, particularly in relation to main TJ authors, David B. Wexler and Bruce J. Winick.

Keywords: judicial empathy, therapeutic jurisprudence, judges, empathy

Language: English

Published: Number 3(35)/2023, pp. 53-64.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.36280//AFPiFS.2023.2.53

Download: Download
Number of downloads: 425

This text is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial – No Derivative Works 4.0 International License.

Institutional Critique as a Research Perspective of Jurisprudence in the Context of Jacques Rancière’s Philosophy

Dr Mariola ŻAK

University of Warsaw

English abstract: The article reflects on the condition of contemporary critique of law in the light of institutional critique derived from the theory of art. This study aims to verify the thesis that institutional critique is a research perspective formed against the background of various trends of critical legal thought. This critique is affirmative and constructive in character. It focuses on the analysis of the performance of reflexive institutions and it also problematizes cognitive tensions that are inherent in legal institutions. The institutions are analysed in the light of the metaphor of aesthetic play. The article presents the theoretical grounding of the relationship between institutional critique and critical legal thinking in the light of the philosophy of law inspired by Jacques Rancière’s thought. Furthermore, selected examples of this critique and directions for its potential application are shown in the context of modelling patterns of dialogic legal culture as understood by the law and humanities movement.

Keywords: institutional critique, critical legal thinking, aesthetics of law, law and humanities, Jacques Rancière

Language: Polish

Published: Number 1(34)/2023, pp.87-101

DOI: https://doi.org/10.36280//AFPiFS.2023.1.87

Download: Download
Number of downloads: 388

This text is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial – No Derivative Works 4.0 International License.

Jurisprudence Popularized: Between Law, Literature, and Film

Mgr Marta Dubowska

Jagiellonian University in Kraków

Abstract: In this paper I discuss the apparent similarities between the “literate approach” and the aspiring “visual media approach”. Then, I scrutinize arguments for utility of the second approach. It seems that even though both approaches are founded on similar humanistic considerations, they are nonetheless separate positions; thus the need to justify the application of the second approach independently of the first. As an important task in due course I consider debunking the arguments in support of accusations of the “law and film” movement of being a threat to law and its legitimacy (as related to the “law going pop” argument by Richard K. Sherwin).

Keywords: law and literature, law and film, law and popular culture, narrative, jurisprudence

Language: English

Published: Number 1(26)/2021, s. 21-32.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.36280/AFPiFS.2021.1.21

Download: Download
Number of downloads: 630

Limits of Interpretive Disagreements in Jurisprudence

Dr hab. Adam Dyrda, prof. dr hab. Tomasz Gizbert-Studnicki

Jagiellonian University

English abstract: Does legal interpretation have borders? Are these borders conventionally established? What makes the given ‘legal reasons’, set forth by certain normative theories of legal interpretation, acceptable in legal discourse (even if the reasons are wrong)? In the present paper, we argue that the notion of the borders of legal interpretation is linked to the general notion of the borders of law. We indicate the scope of ‘interpretive theoretical disagreements’ in law, as discussed by certain new, ‘institutional’ versions of legal positivism. Interpretive borders are not fully determined by the given ‘institutional’ framework. In our view, these borders are also more generally determined inter alia by certain truistic (platitudinous) beliefs related to law and interpretation.

Keywords: interpretive methodology, limits of legal interpretation, legal positivism, second-order rules of legal interpretation, normative theories of legal interpretation

Language: Polish

Published: Number 2(23)/2020, pp. 19-34.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.36280/AFPiFS.2020.2.19

Download: Download
Number of downloads: 922

Journal infrastructureISSN 2082-3304Open accessCC BY 4.0Crossref DOIDOAJ