Archiwum Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Społecznej

Journal of the Polish Section of IVR (ISSN:2082-3304)

IVRwww.ivr.org.pl

Search Results for: legal science

In Search of the Nomos of Law. Classical Interpretations and New Challenges to the Autonomy of Law

Dr hab. Maciej Pichlak, prof. UWr

The University of Wrocław

Dr Mateusz Wojtanowski

The University of Wrocław

English abstract: The aim of this article is to expose the concepts of the autonomy of law and, more primary, the nomos of law, together with the problems that these concepts imply. Contemporary challenges of legal practice and legal science, such as crises of the rule of law or the juridification of successive spheres of social life, call for a re-positioning and rethinking of the question of the autonomy of law. As the article points out, the discussions around these challenges can be read as disputes about the nomos of law – its possibility, nature and location. In this vein, the article analyses the concept of the nomos of law and then, with reference to Carl Schmitt’s interpretation of this notion, addresses the question of the possibility of the autonomy of law. The article also reconstructs the basic theoretical positions on the nature of the nomos of law and the autonomy of the legal order, with particular reference to the output of the Wrocław school of legal theory and philosophy of law in this area. Against this background, selected current challenges to the autonomy of law are considered.

Keywords: Autonomy of law, nomos of law, Wrocław school of legal theory and philosophy of law, Włodzimierz Gromski, crisis of autonomy of law, Carl Schmitt

Language: Polish

Published: nr 4(41)/2024, pp. 5-18.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.36280/AFPiFS.2024.4.5

Download: Download

Number of downloads: 333

This text is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

About the Pro-Constitutional Interpretative Directive In Dubio Pro Vita Humana

dr Wiktor Krzymowski

Koźmiński University in Warsaw

English abstract: The article discusses the interpretative directive in dubio pro vita humana (Latin: „when in doubt, favour human life”), as well as its popularization, including encouraging public administration bodies and courts to apply it more widely. The article aims to answer the following research problems: What are the main sources of the in dubio pro vita humana directive in the Polish legal system? What is its content and its key assumptions? What are the potential implications of its application in legal practice? What is the object-related scope of its application?
The formal-dogmatic method is used in the study.
The interpretative directive in dubio pro vita humana is rooted in the constitutional protection of human dignity, life and health. It is confirmed in the views expressed by legal scholars, as well as in the case law of the Constitutional Tribunal and administrative courts. However, in order to increase the scale of its application in practice, it should be regulated by law. The content of the directive is such that it requires any possible doubts about the protection of human life to be resolved in favour of this protection. Applying this directive is pivotal for ensuring institutional healthcare in Poland by choosing such a result of interpretation of provisions of law that maximizes the protection of human life and health. Its object-related scope of application is most strongly linked to healthcare law, but it is also applicable to the interpretation of provisions in other branches of law (for example, in criminal or welfare law), even if prima facie they do not seem directly related to the protection of human health and life. The results are important not only for Polish law, but also for the interpretation of foreign laws and EU law. It seems that this directive may also find its application outside the legal system – for solving ethical problems. An offshoot of this study is the possibility of referring at least part of the comments made to the legal protection of animals, which may contribute to its strengthening and to development of legal science in this area (in dubio pro vita animalium).

Keywords: interpretation of law, Constitution, health, life, reimbursement

Language: Polish

Published: nr 3(40)/2024, pp. 27-40.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.36280/AFPiFS.2024.3.27

Download: Download

Number of downloads: 269

This text is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Critical Analysis of the Hypothesis About the Usefulness of the Idea of Conceptual Metaphor in the Interpretation of Law

dr hab. Robert Piszko, prof. US

University of Szczecin

English abstract: Since George Lakoff and Mark Johnson published a book entitled Metaphors We Live By, metaphors and their role in everyday life have been recognised. Metaphor has henceforth ceased to be a means only of poetic imagination and rhetorical embellishment. It began to be seen also as a form of human thinking, a tool of cognition. Metaphor began to be seen in areas of life where it had hitherto been absent. These areas included law. However, the enthusiasm of authors who see the great role of metaphorical imagery in law is not justified. An analysis of the examples of metaphors in legal texts given in scientific studies indicates too much freedom in qualifying certain expressions as metaphors and seeing their role or usefulness where there is none – that is, also in legal texts and in the interpretation of law. Metaphors are mistaken for phraseological compounds and for previously metaphorical expressions that have permanently lost this character as a result of conventionalization or lexicalisation. The potential effect of adopting a cognitivist perspective has previously been otherwise achieved in the legal sciences at the expected level. The results indicated as possible with the tools of cognitive science are nothing new, and the possibility of achieving them is either debatable or impossible. The conceptual metaphor, on the other hand, can play an important role when it comes to the justification of judicial or administrative decisions, the content of law textbooks, statements of doctrinal representatives with regard to the law Using the language of cognitive science, the radial structures of legal and ethical concepts can more promisingly be made the subject of research, which can enable the coexistence of humans and artificial intelligence. The research material was mainly investigated using the method of linguistic analysis.

Keywords: metaphor, phraseological association, conceptual motivation, radial structures, legal reasoning, legal cognition, interpretation of law

Language: Polish

Published: nr 2(39) 2024, p. 19-33.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.36280/AFPiFS.2024.2.19

Download: Download

Number of downloads: 347

This text is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Law and Values Other Than Moral. On Searching for Tropes in Józef Nowacki’s Works

Prof. dr hab. Kamil ZEIDLER

University of Gdańsk

English abstract: In his article, the author asks the question to what extent considerations in the field of axiology regarding the relationship between law and morality can be useful for the development of the legal-philosophical trend known as legal aesthetics, where the subject of interest is, most generally, the relationship between law and beauty. The starting point for reflections is the issue of axiology in the context of the works left by Józef Nowacki, including, first of all, his article “Valuing in the science of law”. Thus, the subject of the article is axiology, but in a sense that covers both ethics and aesthetics. The author distinguishes four types of description used by legal science: normative description, empirical description, theoretical description and – distinguished by the author – axiological description, which can be justified within the framework of axiological subjectivism. It involves evaluating values and either adding or subtracting them, as well as valuing, that is, comparing and weighing values. The author considers what inspiration in this regard can be drawn from axiological inquiries in general, and Nowacki’s works in particular.

Keywords: axiology, values, valuing, law and morality, principles of law, aesthetics, aesthetics of law

Language: Polish

Published: Number 3(36)/2023, s. 44-50.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.36280/AFPiFS.2023.3.44

Download: Download
Number of downloads: 364

This text is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial – No Derivative Works 4.0 International License.

Separate and Dissenting Judicial Opinions and Their Significance for a Democratic Society. Reflections Against the Background of Polish Law

Joanna Misztal-Konecka

John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland

English abstract: In most legal systems, the administration of justice in complex and difficult cases is, entrusted to panels composed of multiple judges. In practice, rarely does it happen that this designated group of judges is required to reach a unanimous decision. The subject under scrutiny in the article is the issue of the possibility and significance of disclosing the fact that the judgment was not reached unanimously, along with the rationale that the judge(s) pursued in opposing the majority position. The analysis of this issue requires reaching not only for the legal dogmatic method, but also the legal comparative and axiological methods. The presented research leads to the conclusion that legislators (although not in all countries and not in all international organizations) are increasingly open to allow for the disclosure to the parties and the public of the fact that not all judges voted for a particular decision, along with the reasons for the dissenting position. Despite several objections to the institution of dissenting opinion (votum separatum) connected with undermining the authority of the court and the judgment issued, it turns out that democratic society, which values transparency and the power of substantive arguments, approves of this institution. Dissenting opinion safeguards the judge’s right to express their view, as well as the right of the parties and the public to know the reasons for an alternative solution, including their creative use for the benefit of the judiciary and legal science. Consequently, one can claim that dissenting opinions and the reasons for them constitute a crucial factor in shaping the perceptions of justice.

Keywords: dissenting opinion, democratic society, administration of justice, authority of judicial decisions, justification of the acts of applying the law

Language: English

Published: Number 2(35)/2023, pp. 43-52.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.36280//AFPiFS.2023.2.43

Download: Download
Number of downloads: 308

This text is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial – No Derivative Works 4.0 International License.

Issue 3(32)/2022 “Archiwum” is available

We invite you to read the latest issue of “Archiwum Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Społecznej”, the Journal of the Polish Section of IVR. The issue includes the following papers: 

  • Prof. KUL dr hab. Tomasz BARANKIEWICZ, Prof. UJD dr hab. Bogusław PRZYWORA: On Methodological Unity and Diversity of Legal Sciences: A Contribution to Basic Methodological Research
  • Prof. US dr hab. Agnieszka CHODUŃ: Argument from Precedent in Legal Interpretation of Texts of Legal Acts from the Perspective of a Derivative Concept of Legal Interpretation
  • Dr hab. Adam DYRDA: Reflective Legal Positivism
  • Mgr Marta Zuzanna HUK: Equality of Narrative Inclusion in Decision‑Making Processes: A Deliberative Approach
  • Mgr Łukasz ŁYŻWA: Ethics of Strategic Voting in Popular Elections
  • dr hab. Beata POLANOWSKA‑SYGULSKA: John Gray’s Tree‑Part Philosophical Creed
  • Mgr Cezary WĘGLIŃSKI: Maurice Hauriou’s Theory of the Institution: Legal Institutionalism and the Science of the State
  • dr hab. Jerzy ZAJADŁO: Judicial Disobedience, Justice Lemuel Shaw and Commonwealth v. Aves

and the review:

  • Dr Dawid KOSTECKI: How Much Beauty in Law? How Much Law in Beauty? A Review of Kamil Zeidler’s Aesthetics of Law (Gdańsk–Warszawa 2020, pp. 309)

The issue is available HERE.

Number 3(32)/2022 [ENG]

Articles:

Prof. KUL dr hab. Tomasz BARANKIEWICZ, Prof. UJD dr hab. Bogusław PRZYWORA
On Methodological Unity and Diversity of Legal Sciences: A Contribution to Basic Methodological Research

Prof. US dr hab. Agnieszka CHODUŃ
Argument from Precedent in Legal Interpretation of Texts of Legal Acts from the Perspective of a Derivative Concept of Legal Interpretation

Dr hab. Adam DYRDA
Reflective Legal Positivism

Mgr Marta Zuzanna HUK
Equality of Narrative Inclusion in Decision‑Making Processes: A Deliberative Approach

Mgr Łukasz ŁYŻWA
Ethics of Strategic Voting in Popular Elections

Prof. dr hab. Beata POLANOWSKA‑SYGULSKA
John Gray’s Tree‑Part Philosophical Creed

Mgr Cezary WĘGLIŃSKI
Maurice Hauriou’s Theory of the Institution: Legal Institutionalism and the Science of the State

Prof. dr hab. Jerzy ZAJADŁO
Judicial Disobedience, Justice Lemuel Shaw and Commonwealth v. Aves

Reviews and discussions:

Dr Dawid KOSTECKI
How Much Beauty in Law? How Much Law in Beauty? A Review of Kamil Zeidler’s Aesthetics of Law (Gdańsk–Warszawa 2020, pp. 309)

A Wisdom of Chinese Aphorisms. A Few Remarks on the Philosophy of Criminal Law between Chinese and European Rudimentals

Dr Tomasz Snarski

University of Gdańsk

English abstract: The article is a study of the philosophy of law, devoted to the concept and significance of aphorisms in legal science as well as in legal education. The author introduces the concept of Chinese aphorisms (wisdoms, maxims, thoughts), confronting it with the role played by Latin maxims in law and legal culture. He also reviews selected Chinese aphorisms, comparing them with some contemporary basic ideas, concepts and principles of Polish criminal law. The author also advocates a wider use of Chinese aphorisms in discussions on contemporary views on the fundamental institutions of criminal law, treating them also a tool for broader reflection on the contents of paradigms, which perhaps even enables their reinterpretation.

Keywords: legal sentences, legal aphorisms, Chinese aphorisms, philosophy of criminal law, concepts of criminal law, ideas of criminal law, principles of criminal law

Language: Polish

Published: Number 4(29)/2021, pp.58-70

DOI: https://doi.org/10.36280/AFPiFS.2021.4.58

Download: Download
Number of downloads: 745

This text is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial – No Derivative Works 4.0 International License.

Publication Ethics


THE AIM AND THE CHARACTER OF PUBLICATION ETHICS STANDARDS

  1. The aim of the principles of publication ethics adopted by the “Archiwum Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Społecznej”, the journal of the Polish section of IVR, is to ensure that published papers represent the highest standards of scientific integrity and to foster an honest and open scientific discussion which respects the diversity of views and research paradigms.
  1. The principles of publication ethics adopted by our journal are in line with the guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). Regarding the conflict of interests, they are also in line with the recommendations of the Committee on Legal Sciences of the Polish Academy of Sciences (Komitet Nauk Prawnych PAN) concerning the disclosure of conflict of interest in scientific legal publications.
  1. The principles of publication ethics are applied by the Editorial Board and the Editorial Committee. The editors ensure that the standards are also obeyed by authors, reviewers and other people involved in publication process.
  1. With respect to matters not covered by these principles, the Editorial Board and the Editorial Committee adhere to the COPE standards. Doubts are resolved in regards to the aim and the character of the principles of publication ethics.
  1. All questions or information regarding the application of these standards can be sent to the Editorial Board at: archiwum@ivr.org.pl.

DUTIES OF THE MEMBERS OF THE EDITORIAL BOARD
AND THE EDITORIAL COMMITTEE

  1. Members of the Editorial Board (editors) and the Editorial Committee are determined to apply the highest standards of publication ethics and require other people, especially authors and reviewers, to respect them. Each case of scientific misconduct is documented, and information about it is reported to relevant entities in accordance with these principles and legal requirements.
  1. All decisions on the submitted papers are made through procedures which are transparent to authors, reviewers, and other interested parties.
  1. Editors treat all authors equally, regardless of their academic degree or title, age, gender, affiliation and any other characteristics, including their race, nationality, citizenship, ethnicity, worldview, or disabilities.
  1. Editors base their decisions on the substantive value of the text, including originality of the research and presented argumentation, as well as on its relevance from the perspective of the journal’s scope. These criteria are evaluated according to the result of the review process conducted in line with the procedures referred to in point 7.
  1. Members of the Editorial Board refrain from using the submitted materials in any way that was not agreed upon with the author. The results of the research presented in a submitted paper can only be used after the paper has been published.
  1. All information about the author is classified and is subject to disclosure only to the extent and in the manner necessary for publication purposes, in accordance with the procedures referred to in point 7 and regulations on the protection of personal data.
  1. Members of the Editorial Board and of the Editorial Committee are required to know and obey the current legal framework regarding copyright, data protection, and the protection of personal rights.
  1. Members of the Editorial Board and of the Editorial Committee are particularly determined to eliminate all cases of plagiarism, ghost authorship and guest authorship, in accordance with points 26-32 of these standards.
  1. If the Editorial Boards receives a complaint about the infringement of the principles of publication ethics, which consist specific and probable allegations, the editors ask the author to provide an explanation. If the author fails to respond or their response raises reasonable doubts, the complaint is reported to the institution employing or affiliating the author.

DUTIES OF AUTHORS

  1. The authors are required to act honestly and to observe other principles of publication ethics, both during the preparation of the submitted text and cooperation with the editors during the procedures referred to in point 7.
  1. Authors are required to submit only those papers which are original and scientifically reliable. It is unacceptable to make false statements knowingly, to falsify the results or to manipulate the data.
  1. It is considered dishonest by the journal to submit texts which have been published or submitted in another journal, monograph or collective work. It is also considered dishonest to submit the text elsewhere after the text has been submitted to our journal.
  1. It is considered dishonest to submit the text which has been rejected from publication in another journal, monograph or collective work without informing the Editorial Board about this fact. The author is required to provide information on the reasons for the rejection.
  1. Points 17 and 18 also apply to the submission of texts in languages other than the one in which the paper was originally submitted to and published or rejected in another journal, monograph or collective work.However, the author can offer the editors a submission of a new language version of the previously published text. The paper can be submitted if the Editorial Board expresses its interest in the text. In this regard, the Editorial Board takes into account mainly the perspectives of disseminating the results abroad.
  1. The author is required to honestly and reliably quote and attribute the sources.The literature should represent the current state of knowledge in the field of research conducted by the author. It is considered dishonest both to deliberately omit certain sources and to provide notes to sources which the author did not use.
  1. If the paper contains the results of the research which involve the use of personal data, the author is either required to ensure the proper anonymization of the data in line with the used methodology or obtain the consent of the people whose data has been used.
  1. The author is required to reveal all the sources of funding for their research and/or other support received while preparing the text, in line with the standards regarding the conflict of interest, ghost authorship and guest authorship referred to in points 23-28.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

  1. If a text is submitted by a member of the Editorial Board or a person who is in such a relationship with a member of the Editorial Board that a conflict of interest might emerge (e.g. a family member or other person with close personal ties to the author), the activities preceding the review process and the review process itself are carried out by a member of the Editorial Board who is not the author of the text and who is not in the conflict of interest. The names of the reviewers are not revealed to the member of the Editorial Board excluded from the review process.
  1. A conflict of interest may arise in case of a relationship between the author of the text and a public or private entity that is directly interested in a specific interpretation of the law or benefits from it. The Editorial Board should be informed about the relationship. The Editorial Board assesses whether the relationship could affect the author’s compliance with the principles of publication ethics.
  1. The relationship referred to in point 24 may include: a) performing a work for a given entity (based on contracts of various types), paid representation of the entity as a proxy, or acting on behalf of the entity as an expert – in the course of work on the submitted text or in the last 3 years, especially when the text is a repetition or a modified version of a pleading or an opinion prepared for a given entity; b) participating in issuing a decision of a court or other authority, which is afterwards analyzed in the submitted text; c) using the funds of a given entity to conduct research reported in the submitted text or other research (which has been carried out in the last 3 years or an ongoing one), particularly to cover the costs of publishing the results of the research.

GHOST AUTHORSHIP AND GUEST AUTHORSHIP

  1. The following actions are considered to be dishonest and are unacceptable: a) ghost authorship, i.e. an omission in the list of authors of a person who participated in the creation of the text; b) guest authorship, i.e. including a person who had no influence on the creation of the text in the list of authors.
  1. To prevent ghost authorship, the authors submitting the text are required to reveal all people and institutions which supported them while preparing the paper. In particular, it is unacceptable to omit the authorship of people who contributed to the creation of the text.
  1. To prevent guest authorship, the authors submitting the text are required to include among the authors only the people who significantly contributed to the concept, assumptions, methodology, research, and writing of the paper. If the text was prepared by several authors, each of them is required to provide a statement on their contribution.
  1. In case of a suspected ghost authorship and/or guest authorship, the Editorial Board is required to verify the case and the author is expected to provide explanation. If a ghost authorship and/or guest authorship is proven, the text is rejected and the Editorial Board informs the institution employing or affiliating the author.

PLAGIARISM AND SELF-PLAGIARISM

  1. Plagiarism of any kind is considered to be a particularly blatant manifestation of dishonesty. This includes any appropriation of the authorship of a text, statements, research results, or data.
  1. In the event of a suspected plagiarism, the Editorial Board is required to verify the case and the author is expected to provide an explanation. If plagiarism is proven, the text is rejected and the Editorial Board informs the institution employing or affiliating the author.
  1. It is also unacceptable to reuse fragments of author’s previous works in the submitted text unless an explicit attribution is provided and such a reuse is not significant enough to deem the text unoriginal and self-plagiarised.

DUTIES OF REVIEWERS

  1. The reviewers are obliged to remain impartial and assess only the substantive value of the text. The consistency with the journal’s aim and scope, language proficiency, and compliance with editorial standards can also be evaluated.
  1. If a reviewed paper falls outside the reviewer’s area of expertise, they are obliged to inform the Editorial Board about this fact immediately.
  1. The reviewers cannot be affiliated with the same institution as the author and cannot be in a conflict of interest. In case of a detected conflict of interest – involving the discovery of the author`s identity – the reviewer is obliged to inform the Editorial Board immediately.
  1. The reviewers are required to inform the Editorial Board about any suspected scientific dishonesty to which these principles refer and about any other violation of principles of publication ethics.
  1. The reviewers are required to treat the reviewed paper as confidential and should refrain from using the text in their own research until it is published. It is also forbidden to grant other people access to the reviewed text.
  1. The reviewers are obliged to prepare the reviews within the deadline and in line with the procedures referred to in point 7. If the review cannot be prepared in time, the reviewer should immediately inform the Editorial Board.

POST-PUBLICATION PROCEDURES

  1. If the Editorial Board learns after the text has been published that during the procedures referred to in point 7 serious violations of the principles of publication ethics occurred, it notifies the scientific institution employing or affiliating the author about the situation, retracts the text from open access and publishes information on the discovered infringement inits place.
  1. If the author discovers a fundamental error in an already published text, they should inform the Editorial Board. The Editorial Board verifies the case and considers possible actions.

External Funding

Our issues were so far financed or co-financed by:

Number Institution providing external funding
1/2010 University of Warsaw Foundation
1/2011 Faculty of Law and Administration, University of Łódź
1/2012 Faculty of Law and Administration, University of Łódź
1/2013 Faculty of Law, Administration and Economics, University of Wrocław
2/2013 Faculty of Law and Administration, University of Szczecin
1/2014 Faculty of Law and Administration, Maria Curie-Sklodowska University
2/2014 Faculty of Law and Administration, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań
1/2015 Faculty of Law, Canon Law and Administration, The John Paul II Catholic
University of Lublin
2/2015 Faculty of Law and Administration, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn
1/2017 Faculty of Law and Administration, Jagiellonian University in Kraków
2/2017 Faculty of Law and Administration, University of Warsaw
1/2018 Faculty of Law and Administration, University of Gdańsk
and Institute for Legal Ethics Foundation
2/2018 Faculty of Law, Administration and Economics, University of Wrocław
3/2018 National Science Centre, Project no. 2016/21/B/HS5/00164
1/2019 Ministry of Science and Higher Education (“Support for scientific journals” programme) and Faculty of Law and Administration, University of Łódź
2/2019 Ministry of Science and Higher Education (“Support for scientific journals” programme) and University of Rzeszów
3/2019 National Science Centre, Project no. 2015/17/B/HS5/00768.
1/2020 Ministry of Science and Higher Education (“Support for scientific journals” programme)
2/2020 Ministry of Science and Higher Education (“Support for scientific journals” programme) and University of Silesia
3/2020 Ministry of Science and Higher Education (“Support for scientific journals” programme) and Faculty of Law and Administration, University of Zielona Góra
4/2020 Ministry of Science and Higher Education (“Support for scientific journals” programme)
1/2021 Faculty of Law, Administration and Economics, University of Wrocław
Institute of Legal Sciences, University of Zielona Góra
2/2021 Institute of Legal Sciences, Maria Curie-Skłodowska University in Lublin
Department of Theory and Philosophy of the State and Law of the Faculty of Law and Administration, University of Gdańsk
Faculty of Law, University of Białystok
3/2021 the center of the theory of law of the Jagiellonian University
Faculty of Law and Administration, University of Szczecin
Faculty of Law and Administration, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn
4/2021 Department of Law Policy, University of Lodz
Institute of Legal Sciences, John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin
Institute of Legal Sciences, College of Social Sciences, University of Rzeszów
1/2022 Faculty of Law and Administration, University of Warsaw
2/2022 Faculty of Law and Administration, University of Łódź
3/2022 the center of the theory of law of the Jagiellonian University
Faculty of Law and Administration of the University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn
Institute of Legal Sciences of the University of Zielona Góra
Faculty of Law and Economics of Jan Długosz University of Humanities and Natural Sciences  in Częstochowa
4/2022 Ministry of Education and Science (“Development of scientific journals” program)
Faculty of Philosophy of Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań
1/2023 Ministry of Education and Science (“Development of scientific journals” program)
Department of Theory and Philosophy of State and Law, Faculty of Law and Administration, University of Gdańsk
2/2023 Ministry of Education and Science (“Development of scientific journals” program)
3/2023 Ministry of Education and Science (“Development of scientific journals” program)
4/2023 Ministry of Education and Science (“Development of scientific journals” program)
1/2024 Ministry of Education and Science (“Development of scientific journals” program)
2/2024 Ministry of Education and Science (“Development of scientific journals” program)
3/2024 Ministry of Education and Science (“Development of scientific journals” program)
4/2024 Ministry of Education and Science (“Development of scientific journals” program)
Faculty of Law, Administration and Economics of the University of Wrocław
3/2025 Faculty of Law and Administration University of Zielona Góra
4/2025 Faculty of Law, Administration and Economics of the University of Wrocław
Journal infrastructureISSN 2082-3304Open accessCC BY 4.0Crossref DOIDOAJ