Archiwum Filozofii Prawai Filozofii Społecznej

Journal of the Polish Section of IVR (ISSN:2082-3304)

IVRwww.ivr.org.pl

Rehabilitacja namiętności? Emocje a postulat bezstronności

Dr Maciej Wojciechowski

Uniwersytet Gdański

Abstrakt w języku angielskim: Traditional philosophical tension between a reason and emotions has been a subject of increasing objections. As a result emotions are defended by pointing their connections with beliefs, value judgments to name just a few strategies. This paper also takes up an attempt of this sort showing that traditional definition of emotions with features of the process of application of law makes a threat from the emotions for the impartiality of a judge much less warranted than it might seem. What is more, an attempt is taken up to argue that feeling can be a chance for impartiality conceived as argumentative openness.

Słowa kluczowe: rozum, emocje, bezstronność, decyzja sędziowska

Język artykułu: polski

Opublikowano: Numer 2(7)/2013, s. 71-77

Ściągnij plik: Download

Liczba ściągnięć: 367

Prawo jako dyskurs o życiu – antropologia dogmatyczna Pierre’a Legendre’a

Dr Tatiana Chauvin

Uniwersytet Warszawski

Abstrakt w języku angielskim: In the present text the author introduces the concept of dogmatic anthropology – the original idea of French philosopher, lawyer and psychoanalyst Pierre Legendre. In this conception the positive order of law should be completed by „another scene”, i.e. human unconscious. The law and namely the justification of normativity is profoundly dependent of Freudian constructions of Totem and Taboo and Lacanian conception of mirror and the role of the father as big Other. Psychoanalytic categories serve to explain the sense of legitimacy of the normative order. Our time must acknowledge his uncertain and terrifying condition and recognize that the basic reflection focuses on question: why have the law? The role of the law refers to the establishment of a zone of Prohibition and principle of filiation. This allows a subject might be born in the institutional order and be protected by it. In this sense, the subject is captured by the institution and the law become the creator of life. P. Legendre stresses the importance of the Legal Text as a source of normativity establishing identity through words.

Słowa kluczowe: Pierre Legendre, antropologia dogmatyczna, psychoanaliza

Język artykułu: polski

Opublikowano: Numer 2(7)/2013, s. 5-24

Ściągnij plik: Download

Liczba ściągnięć: 423

Jednolitość orzecznictwa a paradygmat interpretacyjny (ze szczególnym uwzględnieniem reguły clara non sunt interpretanda)

Dr Tomasz Grzybowski

Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny

Abstrakt w języku angielskim: A subject of the article is uniformity of judicial interpretation in the context of two rules of interpretation, namely a clara non sunt interpretanda rule and an omnia sunt interpretanda rule challenging first mentioned method. The author points out that taking into consideration omnia sunt interpretanda rule, i.e. order to perform interpretation in every case, may lead to disintegration of judicial interpretation and as a consequence destabilization of judicature in general. Main thesis of the article is that institutional conceptualization of the clara non sunt interpretanda rule is an answer to this threat, because application of this rule enhances the argument from precedent in judicature. According to abovementioned version of clara non sunt interpretanda rule, legal text is considered as obvious and needs no interpretation if its meaning is certain in previous judicial interpretation, e.g. there is line of precedents or preliminary ruling. However it must be underlined that clara non sunt interpretanda rule is not unquestionable. It is a defeasible argument in judicial discourse; it only changes an argumentation burden which does not rest on the one who refers to this rule, but on the one who challenges the rule (wants to perform interpretation).

Słowa kluczowe: wykładnia operatywna, clara non sunt interpretanda, omnia sunt interpretanda

Język artykułu: polski

Opublikowano: Numer 2(7)/2013, s. 25-37

Ściągnij plik: Download

Liczba ściągnięć: 364

Dlaczego rozważa się stosowanie tortur – o kolizji fundamentalnych zasad porządku prawnego

Mgr Paweł Przygucki

Uniwersytet Łódzki

Abstrakt w języku angielskim: The article focuses on the dispute about the possibility of legalizing tortures in certain circumstances, that is so-called ‘ticking bomb scenario’ and ‘innocent hostage scenario’. Those cases occurred in reality, thus they triggered a discussion about moral and legal aspects of tortures. The aim of this publication is to reveal that in fact the aforesaid issue is a question of a collision of fundamental principles of the legal system – on the one hand there are dignity and rights of the defendant, but on the other should be mentioned such worths as public security or protecting innocent people’ lives. This publication also describes methods of solving a collision of law’s principles (on the basis of R. Dworkin and R. Alexy recommendations) as well as attempts to propose a specific penal law reaction to a crime of torture committed by a police officer or any other public investigator.

Słowa kluczowe: stosowanie tortur, kolizja zasad, ticking-bomb scenario, innocent hostage scenario

Język artykułu: polski

Opublikowano: Numer 2(7)/2013, s. 63-70

Ściągnij plik: Download

Liczba ściągnięć: 384

„Are we all feminists now”? Wyzwania ze strony Feministycznej Jurysprudencji wobec tradycyjnej teorii prawa

Dr Lidia Rodak

Uniwersytet Śląski w Katowicach

Abstrakt w języku angielskim: The potential of Feminist Jurisprudence is mainly built on its criticism of Traditional Jurisprudence. Through the deconstruction of the latter’s main categories such as objectivity,justice, equality, and rationality, Feminist Jurisprudence aims to demonstrate that Traditional Jurisprudence tends to mask inequality, exclusion and lack of recognition rather than beingable to bring about change or provide the values under research. What is more, FJ indicates a wide range of topics that are not explored by Traditional Jurisprudence and thus have nochance to be dealt with using traditional tools. As a result, Feminist Jurisprudence provides a separate language, a different epistemology and methodological tools that can broadenaccess to justice including all subjects by giving them recognition. What follows from thesetwo approaches to jurisprudence and two distinct sets of epistemological assumptions isa different understanding of the subject and a different vision of social relations. As Feminist Jurisprudence convincingly shows, traditional law, with its inclination for objectivity defendslegal norms as part of the legal and social order rather than an individual autonomy andintegrity of subjects. In this paper I would like to suggest a middle-way solution going beyondthe dualistic categories of objectivity and subjectivity. The proposal calls for a deep structuralchange of the legal discourse as the only one that really matters from the feminist point of view.

Słowa kluczowe: jurysprudencja feministyczna, tradycyjna teoria prawa, obiektywizm, subiektywizm

Język artykułu: polski

Opublikowano: Numer 1(8)/2014, s. 67-76

Ściągnij plik: Download

Liczba ściągnięć: 440

Infrastruktura czasopismaISSN 2082-3304Otwarty dostępCC BY 4.0Crossref DOIDOAJ