Archiwum Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Społecznej

Journal of the Polish Section of IVR (ISSN:2082-3304)

IVRwww.ivr.org.pl
  • About us
  • Aim & scope
  • News
  • Issues
    • Current issue
    • Past Issues
    • Thematic Collections
  • Editorial board
    • Board Members
    • Reviewers
  • For authors
  • Ethics
  • Contact
  • Polski

‘The Lawyer Personality’. Personal traits of lawyers and the way they perform their professional roles

Dr Adam Zienkiewicz

University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn


English abstract:
The main aim of the paper is to present a catalogue of relevant categories of personal traits that constitute the so-called ‘Lawyer Personality’. Personal traits influence the choice and the individual way in which a lawyer performs professional roles. The article indicates the typical lawyer personality traits, such as the need for competition and dominance, pragmatism, pessimism, materialism, cynicism, Machiavellianism, a tendency to become aggressive under stress, an ambition-fuelled focus on ‘winning the case’ combined with low interpersonal sensitivity, and an emphasis on the economic aspects of cases. The author calls for strengthening self-reflection and self-awareness among law students and lawyers with regard to their personal traits, which form the individual lawyer personality, in order for each lawyer to find an effective and satisfactory way of practicing law.

Keywords: personal traits, lawyer personality, professional roles of lawyer

Language: Polish

Received: 06.06.2017
Accepted: 01.09.2017

Published: Number 1(16)/2018, pp. 94-102.

Download file: Download

Number of downloads:
498

Filed Under: Articles Tagged With: Adam Zienkiewicz, lawyer personality, personal traits, professional roles of lawyer

Formalism in the application of law and ethics on the example of environmental law regulations

Mgr inż. Adrian Zając

University of Wrocław


English abstract:
This paper discusses formalism, a multi-faceted and problematic research topic when applied to law. The most important point of reference in the presented point of view is ethics. That is why the author emphasizes the importance of asking whether formalism is an ethical behaviour in the context of applying the law. The application of law is presented using the following two conceptions: as a behavior of officials, acting as public administration authorities, and as a theoretical model of this phenomenon. This paper is mostly about the first conception: the behaviour of officials and authorities. The problem of formalism and the effects it can lead to are discussed on the basis of specific laws and regulations concerning environmental protection. Research shows that formalism is based on lack of care for the integrity of the legal text and lack of officials’ consistency in recreating the intention of the lawmaker. This kind of activity is presented as unethical, as it may cause unjustified, negative effects in the life of the individual who is a party to the proceedings.

Keywords: ethics, application of law, formalism, environmental protection law

Language: Polish

Received: 06.06.2017
Accepted: 08.09.2017

Published: Number 1(16)/2018, pp. 83-93.

Download file: Download

Number of downloads:
456

Filed Under: Articles Tagged With: Adrian Zając, application of law, environmental protection law, ethics, formalism

Statement of reasons for a dissenting opinion as a dialogical utterance on the example of selected rulings of the Polish Constitutional Tribunal

Dr Maciej Wojciechowski

University of Gdańsk


English abstract:
This paper claims that the statement of reasons for a dissenting opinion is a dialogical utterance. Due to the limitations imposed by the secrecy of judicial deliberations it is impossible to describe the direct exchange of arguments between the members of a judicial panel. To some extent, however, we can assume that the presented opinion of the court and a dissenting opinion represent the end result of such deliberations. It is not the same, however, to call both of them examples of dialogue. Real-time dialogue consists of a multitude of utterances of people taking part in a discussion. In the case of the final statement of reasons of the judgment and of the dissenting opinion, the number of utterances is in general limited to two separate large blocks of sentences, each block being one utterance. For this reason we can distinguish between the notion of ‘dialogue’ and that of ‘dialogical utterance’. Such a distinction was proposed in Polish theory of literature in the 1970s by J. Lalewicz. According to Lalewicz, a dialogical utterance depends on the preceding opinion, and its main feature is the ability to become a reference to that opinion. Apart from presenting forms of dialogicality, the article aims to explain these forms by presenting features other than the personal style of legal writing of a given judge. Three factors that might explain the higher or lower level of dialogicality in dissenting opinions are presented. The first factor is of an institutional nature, that is, the way work in the court is organised. The second factor is what I call a potential for an argument. Finally, the third one is the axiological importance of a given case.

Keywords: dissenting opinion, dialogical utterance, dialogue, judicial deliberations, statement of reasons for a court judgment, Constitutional Tribunal, legal disagreement

Language: Polish

Received: 06.06.2017
Accepted: 22.08.2017

Published: Number 1(16)/2018, pp. 69-82.

Download file: Download

Number of downloads:
435

Filed Under: Articles Tagged With: Constitutional Tribunal, dialogical utterance, dialogue, dissenting opinion, judicial deliberations, legal disagreement, Maciej Wojciechowski, statement of reasons for a court judgment

Self-government institutions of the legal professions of public trust in the light of assumptions of Paul Ricoeur’s ‘little ethics’

Dr Marcin Pieniążek

Andrzej Frycz Modrzewski Krakow University


English abstract:
In this article, the problems of institutional aspects of lawyers’ legal ethics are discussed. On the theoretical plane, the concept of lawyers’ self-government institutions is reinterpreted in the perspective of ‘little ethics’ outlined by Paul Ricoeur’s in his work Oneself as Another. This approach is cognitively justified because, in the light of the assumptions adopted by the philosopher, the ethical aspiration of an entity can be fully realised only in ‘just institutions’. In the first place, the text discusses the fundamental importance of the institution, taking into consideration the achievements of legal meta-ethics. The point of reference for the analyses undertaken by the author is the role played by the concept in question in the ethical and professional codifications of the self-governments of attorneys and legal advisors in Poland. In the key part of the discussion, Ricoeur’s concept of ethics is adopted as the basis for systematizing and reinterpreting the issues relating to institutions of self-government of the legal professions of public trust. Ultimately, the theory of professional ethics, referring to the philosopher’s work, enables characterising in a comprehensive way the ethical aspirations of a lawyer at the internal, interpersonal and institutional levels.

Keywords: institutions, lawyers’ professional self-government, legal ethics, ‘little ethics’, Paul Ricoeur

Language: Polish

Received: 06.06.2017
Accepted: 08.09.2017

Published: Number 1(16)/2018, pp. 54-68.

Download file: Download

Number of downloads:
410

Filed Under: Articles Tagged With: “little ethics”, institutions, lawyers’ professional self-government, legal ethics, Marcin Pieniążek, Paul Ricoeur

Legal ethics as an institution in the light of Neil MacCormick’s social ontology

Mgr Katarzyna Mikołajczyk-Graj

University of Warsaw


English abstract:
In Neil MacCormick’s social ontology, the most important concept is ‘institution’. It is characterised by the notion of the institution’s normative core, which distinguishes the given institution from other institutions of social life. The normative core of an institution consists of a collection of values realised by it and a set of social practices. An analysis of professional ethics according to Neil MacCormick’s social ontology allows us to distinguish the normative core of this institution, which may be cognitively promising for several reasons. First of all, the institutional perspective may be helpful in solving the problems with justifying a lawyer’s power, which is based on formalized ethical codes. Secondly, establishing a central set of professional values and practices will make it easier for participants of the given practice to choose the right course of action. Thirdly, identifying the normative core of legal professions will allow us to determine the extent of interference in the self-government of legal professions.

Keywords: legal ethics, Neil MacCormick, institutions

Language: Polish

Published: Number 1(16)/2018, pp. 46-53.

Download file: Download

Number of downloads:
385

Filed Under: Articles Tagged With: institutions, Katarzyna Mikołajczyk-Graj, legal ethics, Neil MacCormick

Subjectivity, responsibility, historicity of a profession and a professional on the example of the profession of a legal advisor

Dr Paweł Łabieniec

University of Łódź


English abstract:
Among the legal professions in Poland, the profession of a legal advisor is the most suitable to show how the responsibility of this job and those who perform it has been perceived over time, in the context of the social and economic changes in the legal environment. The transformation of the job, which in the pre-1989 communist period was performed mostly under an employment contract, into a profession of public trust in the strict sense, was underpinned by radical political, social and economic changes. This article presents how these changes turned the job of a legal advisor into a profession. The area of competencies of legal advisors gradually grew, making these professionals increasingly responsible for maintaining high standards of the rendered services and for setting ever higher ethical requirements. The changes in the methods of practising the profession required regular modifications of codes of professional ethics. This process provides ample evidence that professional conduct is a reflection of the social role which the professionals are expected to play.

Keywords: legal advisors, history of the profession of legal advisor, professional ethics of legal advisors, responsibility of a professional

Language: Polish

Received: 06.06.2017
Accepted: 01.09.2017

Published: Number 1(16)/2018, pp. 34-45.

Download file: Download

Number of downloads:
509

Filed Under: Articles Tagged With: history of the profession of legal advisor, legal advisors, Paweł Łabieniec, professional ethics of legal advisors, responsibility of a professional

David J. Luban’s legal ethics: moral evaluations of acts, subjectivity, responsibility

Dr hab. Przemysław Kaczmarek

University of Wrocław


English abstract:
The purpose of this paper is to present the theory of legal ethics by David J. Luban. The reading of this American philosopher’s project I would like to propose focuses around the three pillars mentioned in the title: the moral evaluation of acts, subjectivity, and moral responsibility. Luban’s theory postulates maintaining the autonomy of an individual performing a lawyer’s role in relation to the institutional structure. Therefore, a lawyer’s activity should be characterised by anxiety and questions ‘what should I do?’ The main axis of Luban’s project is criticism of the standard view supporting the principle that institutional morality is independent of social or individual morality. The principle of neutrality assumes that the morality of a professional role should be limited to the institutional dimension. Such an approach is supposed to prevent (especially in case of an attorney) any individual assessments of the client’s behaviour, or – in a broader sense – performing the professional role at one’s own discretion.

Keywords: legal culture, legal ethics, professional role, subjectivity/structure, moral responsibility

Language: Polish

Received: 06.06.2017
Accepted: 16.08.2017

Published: Number 1(16)/2018, pp. 21-33.

Download file: Download

Number of downloads:
541

Filed Under: Articles Tagged With: legal culture, legal ethics, moral responsibility, professional role, Przemysław Kaczmarek, subjectivity/structure

Traditional and modern conceptions of ethical and professional responsibility

Prof. KUL dr hab. Tomasz Barankiewicz

The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin


English abstract:
The main aim of this paper is to emphasize the changes that took place in late 20th century in the thinking about professional responsibility. Today, mainly under the influence of social sciences, the importance of systemic approaches, such as building the so-called ethical infrastructure, is emphasized. This phenomenon should be seen in the perspective of the growing importance of social responsibility, openness, and transparency in public life. The author argues that in the thinking about professional responsibility there has been a shift from individual, internal, and negative responsibility towards social responsibility, usually expressed in the form of ethical infrastructure. The whole discussion is conducted on three planes: 1) the philosophical one, 2) the sociological one, and 3) that of legal sciences.

Kaywords: professional ethics, social responsibility, professional responsibility of lawyers

Language: Polish

Received: 06.06.2017
Accepted: 06.08.2017

Published: Number 1(16)/2018, pp. 8-20.

Download file: Download

Number of downloads:
498

Filed Under: Articles Tagged With: professional ethics, professional responsibility of lawyers, social responsibility, Tomasz Barankiewicz

Does every culture deserves a defence? Few queries concerning cultural defence and criminal law in the age of multiculturalism

Mgr Michał Dudek

Jagiellonian University


English abstract:
The aim of the article is to indicate some of the axiological problems faced by the legislator in the law-making process. They are clearly visible in those legal regulations that are introduced in response to crisis situations. The presented example – terrorist attack by hijacking a plane – is not only used to demonstrate dilemmas which in this situation must be settled by the legislator preparing relevant legal provisions, but it is also a pretext for enriching the discussion on the axiological aspect of the law. The article focuses on the so-called natural helplessness of law in axiological matters, law inflation and the problem of responsibility. The author concludes that issues indicated in the article cannot be solved in the light of current Constitutional Court’s judgements, which are treated as a reference point of the discussed issues.

Keywords: cultural defence, multiculturalism, ethnocentrism, militant ethnocentrism, criminal law, minority rights

Language: Polish

Published: Number 2(3)/2011, pp. 47-60.

Download file: Download

Number of downloads:
659

References:

  1. Appadurai A., Strach przed mniejszościami. Esej o geografii gniewu, tłum. M. Bucholc, Warszawa 2009 
  2. Arjona C., Truffin B.,  The Cultural Defence in Spain, w: Foblets M.-C., Renteln A.D.  (red.), Multicultural Jurisprudence. Comparative Perspectives on the Cultural Defense, Portland 2009 
  3. Bronitt S., Visions of a Multicultural Criminal Law: an Australian Perspective, w: Foblets M.-C., Renteln A.D.  (red.), Multicultural Jurisprudence. Comparative Perspectives on the Cultural Defense, Portland 2009 
  4. Carstens P.A., The Cultural Defence in Criminal Law: South African Perspectives, w: Foblets M.-C., Renteln A.D.  (red.), Multicultural Jurisprudence. Comparative Perspectives on the Cultural Defense, Portland 2009 
  5. Chiu E.M., Culture as Justification, not Excuse, St. John’s Legal Studies Research Paper No. 06-0043 
  6. Coleman D.L., Individualizing Justice through Multiculturalism: the Liberal’s Dilemma, “Columbia Law Review” 1996, t. 96, nr 5 
  7. Deckha M., The Paradox of the Cultural Defence: Gender and Cultural Othering in Canada, w: Foblets M.-C., Renteln A.D.  (red.), Multicultural Jurisprudence. Comparative Perspectives on the Cultural Defense, Portland 2009 
  8. Donovan M., Garth J.S., Delimiting the Culture Defense, “Quinnipiac Law Review” 2007 
  9. Eisenberg A., Spinner-Halev J., Introduction, w: Eisenberg A., Spinner-Halev J.  (red.), Minorities within Minorities. Equality, Rights and Diversity, Cambridge 2005 
  10. Fish S., Boutique Multiculturalism, or Why Liberals Are Incapable of Thinking about Hate Speech, “Critical Inquiry” 1997, t. 23 
  11. Fontaine R.G., Held E.M., On the Boundaries of Culture as an Affirmative Defense, “Arizona Law Review” 2009 
  12. Gierszewski Z., Kultura – moralność – względność. Doktryna relatywizmu kulturowego M.J. Herskovitsa, Poznań 2000 
  13. Gryniuk A., Prawo jako forma techniki społecznej i jego funkcje, w: Polkowska G. (red.), Prawo i ład społeczny. Księga pamiątkowa dedykowana Profesor Annie Turskiej, Warszawa 2000 
  14. Kaczmarek P., Pytanie o użyteczność perspektywy (etno)centrycznej dla rozważań nad prawem, Błachut M. (red.), Z zagadnień teorii i filozofii prawa. Ponowoczesność, Wrocław 2007 
  15. Kojder A., Godność i siła prawa, Warszawa 2001 
  16. Maier S., Honor Killings and the Cultural Defense in Germany, w: Foblets M.-C., Renteln A.D. (red.), Multicultural Jurisprudence. Comparative Perspectives on the Cultural Defense, Portland 2009 
  17. Merle J.-Ch., Cultural Defence, Hate Crimes and Equality Before the Law, “Ethic@” 2006, t. 5, nr 1 
  18. Morawski L., Główne problemy współczesnej filozofii prawa. Prawo w toku przemian, Warszawa 2005
  19. Oude Breuil B.C., Dealing with Ethnic Order in Criminal Law in Practice: a Case Study from the Netherlands, w: Foblets M.-C., Renteln A.D. (red.), Multicultural Jurisprudence. Comparative Perspectives on the Cultural Defense, Portland 2009 
  20. Paleczny T., Stosunki międzykulturowe: modele pluralizmu w społeczeństwach „ponowoczesnych”, w: Golemo K., Paleczny T., Wiącek E. (red.), Wzory wielokulturowości we współczesnym świecie, Kraków 2006 
  21. Phillips A., Multiculturalism without Culture, Princeton 2009 
  22. Renteln A.D., The Cultural Defense, Nowy Jork 2004 
  23. Renteln A.D., The cultural defense: Challenging the monocultural paradigm, w: Foblets M.-C., Gaudreault-Desbiens J.-F., Renteln A.D. (red.), Cultural Diversity and the Law: State Responses from Around the World, Bruksela 2010 
  24. Rokicki J., O realności i złudzeniu „globalizacji”, „wielokulturowości” i „ponowoczesności”, w: Golemo K., Paleczny T., Wiącek E.  (red.), Wzory wielokulturowości we współczesnym świecie, Kraków 2006 
  25. Shachar A., Multicultural Jurisdictions. Cultural Differences and Women’s Rights, Cambridge 2001 
  26. Siesling M., Ten Voorde J., The Paradox of Cultural Differences in Dutch Criminal Law, w: Foblets M.-C., Renteln A.D. (red.), Multicultural Jurisprudence. Comparative Perspectives on the Cultural Defense, Portland 2009 
  27. Sitarz O., Culture defence a polskie prawo karne, „Archiwum Kryminologii” 2007–2008/ t. XXIX–XXX 
  28. Sulikowski A., Współczesny paradygmat sądownictwa konstytucyjnego wobec kryzysu nowoczesności, Wrocław 2008 
  29. Szahaj A., E pluribus unum? Dylematy wielokulturowości i politycznej poprawności, Kraków 2010 
  30. Warmińska K., Pamięć społeczna w walce o uznanie w społeczeństwie wielokulturowym, w: Golemo K., Paleczny T., Wiącek E. (red.), Wzory wielokulturowości we współczesnym świecie, Kraków 2006 
  31. Wojciechowski B., Interkulturowe prawo karne. Filozoficzne podstawy karania w wielokulturowych społeczeństwach demokratycznych, Toruń 2009 
  32. Woodman G.R., The Culture Defence in English Common Law: the Potential for Development, w: Foblets M.-C., Renteln A.D.  (red.), Multicultural Jurisprudence. Comparative Perspectives on the Cultural Defense, Portland 2009 
  33. Zajadło J., Kontrowersje wokół tzw. obrony przez kulturę – okoliczność wyłączająca winę, okoliczność łagodząca czy nadużycie prawa do obrony, „Przegląd Sądowy” 2007/6 
  34. Zajadło J., Moua zniewala Xeng Xiong, w: J. Zajadło (red.), Fascynujące ścieżki filozofii prawa, Warszawa 2008 
  35. Zajadło J., Po co prawnikom filozofia prawa?, Warszawa 2008 
  36. Zajadło J., Uniwersalizm praw człowieka w konstytucji – bezpieczne i niebezpieczne relatywizacje, „Przegląd Sejmowy” 2007/4 

Filed Under: Articles Tagged With: criminal law, cultural defence, ethnocentrism, Michał Dudek, militant ethnocentrism, minority rights, multiculturalism

Maintaining social order and conflict resolution in non human primates

Dr Mateusz Stępień

Jagiellonian University


English abstract:
In this article author presents a synthesis of previous primatological studies concerning problem of sociality, social order and conflict resolution in non human primates. First part contains discussion about the advantages and disadvantages of sociality – treated as a one of the many possible form of living together – from an evolutionary perspective. The question is: what are fitness consequences of sociality? An inherent sources of conflicts (which reduce fitness) associated with the social living are discussed in next part. This is a necessary background for an analyze of an existing mechanisms for maintaining social order (including preventing and solving conflicts) in various non human primates societies. This are very nuanced and not easy to notice at the first glance natural mechanisms which enable to benefit from sociality despite the fact of the huge evolutionary cost of it. As author argues, the social sciences can gain many benefits from reflective and critical interest of the wider problem of sociality and social order discussed in primatology. This is clearly not a comprehensive study on these issues, but rather an attempt to draw attention to the basic topics and try to start interdisciplinary discussion over them.

Keywords: sociality, social order, conflict management, primatology, evolution

Language: Polish

Published: Number 2(3)/2011, pp. 76-91.

Download file: Download

Numeber of downloads:
432

References:

  1. Aureli F., Post-conflict behavior among wild longtailed macaques (Macaca fascicularis), „Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology” 2002/31 
  2. Aureli F., Post-conflict anxiety in nonhuman primates: the mediating role of emotion in conflict resolution, „Aggressive Behavior” 1997/23 
  3. Aureli F., van Schaik C., Post-conflict behavior in long-tailed macaques (Macaca fasicularis): Coping with uncertainty, „Ethology” 2001/89 
  4. Aureli F., Fraser O.N., Stahl D., Stress reduction through consolation in chimpanzees, „PNAS” 2008/105/25 
  5. Aureli F., Fraser O. N., Stahl D., The Function and Determinants of Reconciliation in Pan troglodytes, „International Journal of Primatology” 2010/31 
  6. Aureli F., Smucny D., The role of emotion in conflict and conflict resolution, w: Natural conflict resolution, (red.) Aureli F., de Waal F., University of California Press, Berkeley 2000 
  7. Aureli F., Schino G., di Sorrentino E.P., Visalberghi E., What time is it? Coping with expected feeding time in capuchin monkeys, „Animal Behaviour” 2010/80/1 
  8. Aureli F., de Waal F.B.M., Why natural conflict resolution?, w: Natural Conflict Resolution 
  9. Bernstein I., Ehardt C., Modification and aggression and the special case of adult and adolescent male rhesus monkey (Macaca mulatta), „American Journal of Primatology” 1986/10 
  10. Boesch Ch., Wittig R.W., The choice of post-conflict interactions in wild chimpanzees (pan troglodytes), „Behavior” 2003/140 
  11. Boyd R., Richerson P., Gene-Culture Coevolution and the Evolution of Social Institutions, w: Better than Conscious? Decision Making, the Human Mind, and Implications for Institutions, (red.) Engel C., Singer W., Cambridge 2008 
  12. Burkart J.M., von Rohr C.R., van Schaik C.P., Evolutionary precursors of social norms in chimpanzees: A new approach, „Biology and Philosophy” 2011/26/2 
  13. Castellanos M., Romero T., de Waal F.B.M., Consolation as possible expression of sympathetic concern among chimpanzees, „PNAS” 2010/107/27 
  14. Castles D., Kutsukake N., Reconciliation and variation in post-conflict stress in Japanese macaques (Macaca fuscata fuscata): testing the integrated hypothesis, „Animal Cognition” 2001/4 
  15. Cheverud J.M., Garber P.A., Sussman R.W., Importance of cooperation and affiliation in the evolution of primate sociality, „American Journal of Physical Anthropology” 2005/128 
  16. Cords M., On Operationally Defining Reconciliation, „American Journal of Primatology” 1993/29 
  17. Dunabr R., Pchły, plotki a ewolucja języka, Warszawa 2009 
  18. Duntley J.D., Shackelford T.K., Darwinian foundations of crime and law, „Aggression and Violent Behavior” 2008/13 
  19. Flack J., Girvan M., Krakauer D., de Waal F.B.M., Policing stabilizes construction of social niches in primates, „Nature” 2006/439/26 
  20. Fujisawa K., Kutsukake N., Hasegawa T., Peacemaking and Consolation in Japanese Preschoolers Witnessing Peer Aggression, „Journal of Comparative Psychology” 2006/120/1 
  21. Goodall J., Order without law, w: Law, Biology and Culture: The Evolution of Law, (red.) Gruter M., Bohannan P., Santa Barbara 1983 
  22. Hayek F., Law, Legislation and Liberty. A new statement of the liberal principles of justice and political economy. Volume I. Rules and Order, London 1979 
  23. Heijer D., Kempes M., Korteweg L., Louwerse A.L., Sterck E.H.M., Socially deprived rhesus macaques fail toreconcile: do they not attempt or not accept reconciliation?, „Animal Behavior” 2009/78/1 
  24. James R., Morrella L.J., Mechanisms for aggregation in animals: rule success depends on ecological variables, „Behavioral Ecology” 2008/19 
  25. Johanowicz D., de Waal F.B.M., Modification of reconciliation behavior through social experience: an experiment with two macaque species, „Child Development” 1993/64 
  26. Jones G.T., Yarn D.H., A biological approach to understanding resistance to apology, forgiveness, and reconciliation in group conflict, „Law & Contemporary Problems” 2009/72 
  27. Judge P., Conflict resolution, w: Primate psychology, (red.) Maestripieri D., Cambridge 2003 
  28. Judge P., de Waal F.B.M., Rhesus monkey behavior under diverse population densities: Coping with long-term crowding, „Animal Behavior” 1997/54 
  29. Koyama N., The long-term effects of reconciliation in Japanese macaques (Macaca fuscata), „Ethology” 2001/107 
  30. Koyama N., Conflict-reduction mechanisms before feeding, w: Natural conflict resolution 
  31. Kroeber A., Parsons T., The concept of culture and social system, „American Sociological Review” 1958/23 
  32. Kummer H., Primate societies: Group techniques of ecological adaptation, New Jersey 2007 
  33. Kutsukake N., Complexity, dynamics and diversity of sociality in group-living mammals, „Ecological Resources” 2009/24 
  34. Machalek R., The evolution of macrosociety: Why are large societies rare?, „Advances in Human Ecology” 2002/1 
  35. Mościskier A., Natura ludzka i problem przestępczości, Warszawa 2001 
  36. Mościskier A., Spór o naturę człowieka. Socjologia czy socjobiologia?, Warszawa 1998 
  37. Nettle D., Beyond nature versus culture: cultural variation as an evolved characteristic, „Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute” 2009/15 
  38. Perry S., What Cultural Primatology Can Tell Anthropologists About the Evolution of Culture, „Annual Review of Anthropology” 2006/35 
  39. Preuschoft S., Are primates behaviorists? Dominance, cognition, and freefloating rationales, „Journal of Comparative Psychology” 1999/113 
  40. van Roosmalen A., de Waal F. N. M., Reconciliation and consolation among chimpanzees, „Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology” 1979/5 
  41. Silk J.B., The adaptive value of sociality in mammalian groups, „Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B” 2007/362 
  42. Simmel G., The Sociology of Conflict. „American Journal of Sociology” 1903/9 
  43. Stępień M., Kultura,prymatów innych niż człowiek jako wyzwanie dla nauk społecznych, „Studia Socjologiczne” 2008/4/191 
  44. Stępień M., The question of non human primates morality, „Studies in the Philosophy of Law” 2010/4 
  45. Stone B.L., The evolution of culture and sociology, „American Sociologists” 2008/39 
  46. Strier K.B., Primate behavioral Ecology: From Ethnography to Ethology and Back, „American Anthropologist” 2003/105/1 
  47. Strum S.C., Almost Human. A Journey into the World of Baboons, Chicago 2001 
  48. de Waal F.B.M., Chimpanzee politics-power and sex among apes, London 1982 
  49. de Waal F.B. M., Good natured: The origins of right and wrong in humans and other animals, Cambridge 2006 
  50. de Waal F.B.M., Peacemaking among primates, Cambridge 1989 
  51. de Waal F.B.M., Primates – A natural heritage of conflict resolution, „Science” 2000/289 
  52. Wilson E.O., Konsiliencja, Warszawa 2002 
  53. Załuski W., Ewolucyjna filozofia prawa, Warszawa 2009 

Filed Under: Articles Tagged With: conflict management, evolution, Mateusz Stępień, primatology, social order, sociality

« Previous Page
Next Page »

Szukaj

Categories

  • Articles
  • Bez kategorii
  • Editorial
  • In Memoriam
  • News
  • Reports
  • Reviews and discussions
Journal infrastructureISSN 2082-3304Open accessCC BY 4.0Crossref DOIDOAJ

Copyright © 2026 Polska Sekcja Międzynarodowego Stowarzyszenia Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Społecznej IVR | Administrator strony: Karolina Gmerek

Ta strona używa plików cookies. Zakładamy, że wyrażają Państwo na to zgodę, ale mogą Państwo także wyłączyć pliki cookies w Ustawieniach. //
This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. (Zob. więcej // Read more) Ustawienia // SettingsZGODA // ACCEPT

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT